I have read through all replies, but I still did not find
answers to my original questions:
Q1: Can I somehow reduce the size of /run? I know it is tmpfs
and I know this is upper limit normally never achieved, but
I want to reduce this upper limit. Is it possible, or is it
hard-coded to half of p
On Sun, 27 May 2012 09:05:46 +0200
Jarry wrote:
> I have read through all replies, but I still did not find
> answers to my original questions:
>
> Q1: Can I somehow reduce the size of /run? I know it is tmpfs
> and I know this is upper limit normally never achieved, but
> I want to reduce this
On Sun, 27 May 2012 04:29:17 +, Joshua Murphy wrote:
> Well, given that it's there, it cleans up after itself, and it avoids
> issues in the instance where /var isn't available early on, is there
> much reason _not_ to link /var/run and /var/lock over to their
> respective equivalents on /run?
On Sun, 27 May 2012 09:05:46 +0200, Jarry wrote:
> I have read through all replies, but I still did not find
> answers to my original questions:
>
> Q1: Can I somehow reduce the size of /run? I know it is tmpfs
> and I know this is upper limit normally never achieved, but
> I want to reduce this
On Sat, 26 May 2012 23:22:22 -0700
Grant wrote:
> > Extensive testing, on the other hand, is something a team should do.
> > Sure, the lone programmer can write you some unit tests and conduct
> > a system test, but testing itself is a profession of its own and
> > should be done by a second pers
Am 27.05.2012 08:22, schrieb Grant:
>>> I'm debating whether I should hire an expert programmer for $X/hour,
>>> or a company of expert programmers for $2X/hour. It makes sense from
>>> a financial perspective to hire programmers directly, but I wonder if
>>> there are benefits to hiring a really
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 09:59 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2012 09:05:46 +0200
> Jarry wrote:
>
> > I have read through all replies, but I still did not find
> > answers to my original questions:
> >
> > Q1: Can I somehow reduce the size of /run? I know it is tmpfs
> > and I know t
I'm debating whether I should hire an expert programmer for $X/hour,
or a company of expert programmers for $2X/hour. It makes sense from
a financial perspective to hire programmers directly, but I wonder if
there are benefits to hiring a really good company.
[snip]
Thank you
Am Sonntag, 27. Mai 2012, 09:09:26 schrieb Grant:
> I'll be getting my feet wet with this shortly. Any other tips
> regarding the management of one or more programmers working on various
> small web projects? Maybe workflow or any key procedures a newbie
> manager should follow?
seriously? ask
>> I'll be getting my feet wet with this shortly. Any other tips
>> regarding the management of one or more programmers working on various
>> small web projects? Maybe workflow or any key procedures a newbie
>> manager should follow?
>
> seriously? asking those questions? Get a company. Make it t
On 05/26/2012 12:16 AM, Colleen Beamer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ever since the last time Thunderbird was updated when I synced, the
> process does not die when I shut down Thunderbird. I have to kill it
> before I can start up Thunderbird again. Is anyone else experiencing
> this problem.
Yes, same her
On Sun, 27 May 2012 09:53:22 -0700
Grant wrote:
> >> I'll be getting my feet wet with this shortly. Any other tips
> >> regarding the management of one or more programmers working on
> >> various small web projects? Maybe workflow or any key procedures
> >> a newbie manager should follow?
> >
>
On Sun, 27 May 2012 09:09:26 -0700
Grant wrote:
> I'm debating whether I should hire an expert programmer for
> $X/hour, or a company of expert programmers for $2X/hour. It
> makes sense from a financial perspective to hire programmers
> directly, but I wonder if there are be
Hi,
I can't emerge any gcc. I tried emerging 4.7, 4.5.3-r2 with no luck.
Should I file a bug?
Thanks,
Ezequiel.
---
Checking multilib configuration for libgomp...
Configuring stage 1 in i686-pc-linux-gnu/libgomp
configure: loading site script /usr/share/config.site
configure: loading site scrip
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Colleen Beamer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ever since the last time Thunderbird was updated when I synced, the
> process does not die when I shut down Thunderbird. I have to kill it
> before I can start up Thunderbird again. Is anyone else experiencing
> this problem. Thou
probably not, you will need some more info as its a bit vague:
What does "gcc -v" say?
and "gcc-config -l"
Can you compile anything, either through emerge or manually (i.e., even
a small "hello world")
Need to narrow it down.
BillK
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 20:33 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 8:48 PM, William Kenworthy wrote:
> probably not, you will need some more info as its a bit vague:
>
> What does "gcc -v" say?
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with:
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.4.5/work/gcc-4.4.5/configure
--prefix=/usr
Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't emerge any gcc. I tried emerging 4.7, 4.5.3-r2 with no luck.
>
> Should I file a bug?
>
> Thanks,
> Ezequiel.
I ran into this a while back and I had to do a emerge -e system then a
emerge -e world. I'm not saying to do this yet but if no one posts a
fi
>
> Well, what do you expect out of the PRC, anyway? Good luck.
>
> Terry
>
>
>
This is resulted by company's security policy. I can login in newsgroup at home.
It's OK, at lease mailist was not blocked.
Thank you.
--
Best regards
Wenpin Cui (崔文频）
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, PRC
Tel: +86-0571-867
On May 28, 2012 6:39 AM, "Ezequiel Garcia" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I can't emerge any gcc. I tried emerging 4.7, 4.5.3-r2 with no luck.
>
> Should I file a bug?
>
> Thanks,
> Ezequiel.
> ---
>
> Checking multilib configuration for libgomp...
> Configuring stage 1 in i686-pc-linux-gnu/libgomp
> configur
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 05:17:54PM -0500, Dale wrote
> I guess the devs are getting ready for the ultimate screwup udev
> and friends is putting in place. Oh well. This is life.
I guess that explains why I have /var/run but no /run on my mdev-based
system.
--
Walter Dnes
On May 28, 2012 9:11 AM, "Walter Dnes" wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 05:17:54PM -0500, Dale wrote
>
> > I guess the devs are getting ready for the ultimate screwup udev
> > and friends is putting in place. Oh well. This is life.
>
> I guess that explains why I have /var/run but no /run on
22 matches
Mail list logo
