Hi,
I've just been bitten by sys-apps/net-tools-1.60_p20120127084908.
After reboot, the network doesn't come up:
localhost /etc/init.d/net.lo[3463]: ERROR: interface lo does not exist
localhost /etc/init.d/net.lo[3464]: Ensure that you have loaded the
correct kernel module for your hardware
l
I've just got an email from Samuli Suominen that this is a bug
in openrc-0.9.9.2 which has just been fixed by openrc-0.9.9.3
Helmut.
On 03/12/2012 09:32:00 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
I've just been bitten by sys-apps/net-tools-1.60_p20120127084908.
After reboot, the network doesn't come
Hi,
even the most recent portage 2.2.0_alpha90 has difficulties handling
@preserved-rebuild especially after many binary emerge operations.
It tries to re-emerge the same packages again and again.
As a last resort I have to remove
/var/lib/portage/preserved_libs_registry.
But after that the
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 07:36:07PM +0100, YoYo Siska wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 03:35:05PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:30:15 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
> >
> > > Any tips on this? Does it make sense to use a special file system just
> > > for the portage tree? Wha
José Romildo Malaquias writes:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 07:36:07PM +0100, YoYo Siska wrote:
> > mke2fs -f -b1024 -i2048 /usr/img_portage
>
> The -f option from mke2fs is to specify a fragment size and expects an
> argument. Do you -F (which forces mke2fs to create a filesystem, even if
> the sp
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 05:09:12AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> This revision makes 2 changes...
> A) The removal of udev is now standard instead of optional. udev-181
> and higher will be pulling in kmod, and anything else that kmod depends
> on. Removing udev will avoid unnecessary cruft on y
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:53:29 +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Is there an elegant way to find these old libraries? (Removing them
> would alert revdep-rebuild afterwards).
man qfile and look at the section on finding orphan files.
Emerge portage-utils if you don't have qfile.
--
Neil Bothwic
I only recently emerged the gnome tracker and try to index my
thunderbird emails.
tracker-control -l shows that the "email"-miner is/seems disabled.
I used USE=thunderbird for app-misc/tracker and I see the addon
"Trackerbird" within thunderbird. But I saw the addon indexing mails
(status bar in
Hi there!
Recently, my sister could not log in to KDE after I had done some
updates. X crashed when loggin into KDE. It turned out that
x11-libs/qt-gui-4.7.4-r1 was the problem when compiled with explict
CFLAGS, instead of just using -march=native.
Her CPU is an AMD A6-3500 with three cores. As I
On 03/12/2012 12:32:01 PM, Alex Schuster wrote:
Hi there!
Recently, my sister could not log in to KDE after I had done some
updates. X crashed when loggin into KDE. It turned out that
x11-libs/qt-gui-4.7.4-r1 was the problem when compiled with explict
CFLAGS, instead of just using -march=native.
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 22:34:27 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> My mother swears blind I watched England win the World Cup but I don't
> remember (being only 1 year old at the time).
I fell asleep during it. To be fair I was nine and had just had an
overnight car journey returning from holiday.
--
> man qfile and look at the section on finding orphan files.
>
> Emerge portage-utils if you don't have qfile.
I just ran
# find /usr/lib* -type f -print0 | xargs -0 qfile -o | more
an was suprised how much orphans there are, already excluding the python
and perl stuff.
Here's some suprising st
On 12/03/12 10:32, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
I've just been bitten by sys-apps/net-tools-1.60_p20120127084908.
After reboot, the network doesn't come up:
localhost /etc/init.d/net.lo[3463]: ERROR: interface lo does not exist
localhost /etc/init.d/net.lo[3464]: Ensure that you have loaded the
c
Hi Alan!
I thought more or less that I have to unmask packages, or making any
configurations to unlock the update to gnome3.
If I run now:
tamer@office ~ $ emerge -pav gnome
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild R] gnome-base/gnom
On March 12, 2012 at 8:56 AM Tamer Higazi wrote:
> Hi Alan!
> I thought more or less that I have to unmask packages, or making any
> configurations to unlock the update to gnome3.
>
> If I run now:
>
> tamer@office ~ $ emerge -pav gnome
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order
and it still didn't bring me the desired result :(
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild R] gnome-base/gnome-2.32.1-r1 USE="cdr cups dvdr ldap
policykit -accessibility -mono" 0 kB
Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 0 kB
!!! The following update has been skipped due to
On March 12, 2012 at 10:04 AM Tamer Higazi wrote:
> and it still didn't bring me the desired result :(
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [ebuild R] gnome-base/gnome-2.32.1-r1 USE="cdr cups dvdr ldap
> policykit -accessibility -mono" 0 kB
>
> Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 02:22:34PM +0100, Andr??s Cs??nyi wrote:
> On 11 March 2012 13:49, Stroller wrote:
> >
> > On 10 March 2012, at 20:56, Andr??s Cs??nyi wrote:
> >> ??? I would like to ask some help! I would like to use gmail smtp to send
> >> my email from my domain which is sayusi.hu, and
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Bruce Hill, Jr.
wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On March 12, 2012 at 10:04 AM Tamer Higazi wrote:
>
>> and it still didn't bring me the desired result :(
>>
>> Calculating dependencies... done!
>> [ebuild R ] gnome-base/gnome-2.32.1-r1 USE="cdr cups dvdr ldap
>> policyk
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:06:23 -0400, David Abbott wrote:
> Each one you get you will need to add to your package.keywords file.
> This is what I would have to do;
> echo "x11-wm/mutter" >> /etc/portage/package.keywords/gnome3
emerge autounmask and use it to write all the packages you need to your
On 12 March 2012, at 14:59, fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 02:22:34PM +0100, Andr??s Cs??nyi wrote:
>> On 11 March 2012 13:49, Stroller wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10 March 2012, at 20:56, Andr??s Cs??nyi wrote:
??? I would like to ask some help! I would like to use gmail smtp to
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Helmut Jarausch
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> even the most recent portage 2.2.0_alpha90 has difficulties handling
> @preserved-rebuild especially after many binary emerge operations.
> It tries to re-emerge the same packages again and again.
> As a last resort I have to remov
These virtual apps are irritating me, and the fanboi answers in #gentoo
are worse.
What is the purpose of virtual/shadow and why would I want it?
Today's update output:
server ~ # emerge -aDjNquv world
[ebuild N] virtual/shadow-0
Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] No
Quitti
Hello!
2012/3/11 Canek Peláez Valdés :
>> The next step was to remove /usr from /etc/fstab to prevent /usr from
>> being mounted twice (the boot process does not like it).
>
> Mmmh. Could you try to use LABEL= in /etc/fstab (not /etc/fstab), and
> see if that way it gets mounted, and only once? T
Hi!
2012/3/11 walt :
> On 03/11/2012 05:16 AM, Jorge Martínez López wrote:
>> Hi!
>
> Hi Jorge.
>
>> I had some struggle with a separate /usr on top of LVM
>
> I'm just curious why you use a separate /usr, and why you are
> willing to struggle to keep it that way. Several people have
> posted opi
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Jorge Martínez López wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 2012/3/11 walt :
>> On 03/11/2012 05:16 AM, Jorge Martínez López wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>
>> Hi Jorge.
>>
>>> I had some struggle with a separate /usr on top of LVM
>>
>> I'm just curious why you use a separate /usr, and why you are
>
On 2012-03-12, Stroller wrote:
>
> On 12 March 2012, at 14:59, fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 02:22:34PM +0100, Andr??s Cs??nyi wrote:
>>> On 11 March 2012 13:49, Stroller wrote:
On 10 March 2012, at 20:56, Andr??s Cs??nyi wrote:
> ??? I would like to ask som
Helmut Jarausch writes:
> On 03/12/2012 12:32:01 PM, Alex Schuster wrote:
> > The command above does not tell about SSE stuff, so I used this one to
> > find out about that:
> >
> > leela # echo | gcc -dME - -march=native | grep -Ei 'SSE|3DNOW|MMX' |
Typo: The -E must be separate: gcc -dM -E
On March 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM Michael Mol wrote:
> Don't forget you're using Gentoo; you're implicitly not very far
> removed from the skill levels of the developers themselves.
>
>
> --
> :wq
>
Maybe you're not, but it only takes me a few minutes being around chithead
and NeddySeagoon for me
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Bruce Hill, Jr.
wrote:
> These virtual apps are irritating me, and the fanboi answers in #gentoo
> are worse.
>
> What is the purpose of virtual/shadow and why would I want it?
Virtual packages are kind of an abstraction layer for compatible
alternative packages.
On 03/12/2012 01:23:21 PM, Michael Hampicke wrote:
> man qfile and look at the section on finding orphan files.
>
> Emerge portage-utils if you don't have qfile.
I just ran
# find /usr/lib* -type f -print0 | xargs -0 qfile -o | more
an was suprised how much orphans there are, already excluding
On 2012-03-11 20:28, Walter Dnes wrote:
> which blob to load. But, if I leave only the correct blob for my GPU in
> the library folder (move/delete all the others), it loads properly
> without any help from udev.
Why not compile the firmware into the kernel?
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Radeo
On 12/03/12 20:05, Bruce Hill, Jr. wrote:
These virtual apps are irritating me, and the fanboi answers in #gentoo
are worse.
What is the purpose of virtual/shadow and why would I want it?
Paul's answers covers it, but I'll give an explanation that is the
reverse of a fanboi answer.
The re
On March 12, 2012 at 2:50 PM Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Bruce Hill, Jr.
> wrote:
> > These virtual apps are irritating me, and the fanboi answers in
#gentoo
> > are worse.
> >
> > What is the purpose of virtual/shadow and why would I want it?
>
> Virtual packages
On 2012-03-11 15:17, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> As such, mdev is a good fit and we can add Walter to the long list of
> people before him who selflessly worked to make our software work
> better.
Very well put, Alan! +1
Thanks Walter!
Best regards
Peter K
On March 12, 2012 at 3:19 PM Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 12/03/12 20:05, Bruce Hill, Jr. wrote:
> > These virtual apps are irritating me, and the fanboi answers in
#gentoo
> > are worse.
> >
> > What is the purpose of virtual/shadow and why would I want it?
>
> Paul's answers covers it, bu
On 2012-03-12 10:24, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> #!/bin/busybox ash
>> mount -t proc proc /proc
>> mount -t sysfs sysfs /sys
>> exec /sbin/init
> How do I know whether my /sbin/linuxrc actually ran? Maybe, I mean how
> can I be sure my "append = "init=/sbin/linuxrc"" actually worked?
Well, you can
> Here /usr/lib is a symlink to /usr/lib64
Now that you mention it: /usr/lib is supposed to be a symlink to
/usr/lib64 on my workstation too (like it is on all my other machines).
But it's not. Seems like something went wrong during installation. Maybe
a bad stage3 image. I created the symlink man
On Monday 12 Mar 2012 18:39:26 Bruce Hill, Jr. wrote:
> On March 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM Michael Mol wrote:
> > Don't forget you're using Gentoo; you're implicitly not very far
> > removed from the skill levels of the developers themselves.
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > :wq
>
> Maybe you're not, but it o
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:19:12 +0200
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 12/03/12 20:05, Bruce Hill, Jr. wrote:
> > These virtual apps are irritating me, and the fanboi answers in
> > #gentoo are worse.
> >
> > What is the purpose of virtual/shadow and why would I want it?
>
> Paul's answers covers it
On your system "emerge gnome" wants to install gnome-2
So either your tree is outdated (you must re-sync) or gnome-3 is still
masked. The second option is more likely and there are two
possibilities for that:
You run a stable system (gnome-3 is still unstable), or
you masked it for some reason.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Bruce Hill, Jr.
wrote:
>
>
>
> On March 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM Michael Mol wrote:
>
>> Don't forget you're using Gentoo; you're implicitly not very far
>> removed from the skill levels of the developers themselves.
>>
>>
>> --
>> :wq
>>
>
> Maybe you're not, but it o
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:39:26 -0400 (EDT)
"Bruce Hill, Jr." wrote:
>
>
>
> On March 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM Michael Mol wrote:
>
> > Don't forget you're using Gentoo; you're implicitly not very far
> > removed from the skill levels of the developers themselves.
> >
> >
> > --
> > :wq
> >
>
> May
Am Montag, 12. März 2012, 12:32:01 schrieb Alex Schuster:
> Hi there!
>
> Recently, my sister could not log in to KDE after I had done some
> updates. X crashed when loggin into KDE. It turned out that
> x11-libs/qt-gui-4.7.4-r1 was the problem when compiled with explict
> CFLAGS, instead of just
I'm using "slim" on both computers and it seems to me they both have the same configuration but on one of them "ck-list-sessions" is showing that tty7 is started twice.
and it is using the sessiont with "active = FALSE" so my logout buttons are grayed out.
ck-list-sessions
Session4:
unix-user
I feel really stupid asking this, but I want to use an HDMI component to
output one of my PCs to the TV set. I've followed all of the wiki entry
at http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/DisplayLink, but there's something else I
need to know. I get the green screen on the TV that it mentions when
the kernel
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:29:10 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Anyone care to offer an opinion on what it will take to get PROVIDES
> support in portage?
IMO, it would take virtuals causing so many headachy breakages that
some devs started keeping up a steady drumbeat on irc and mailing
lists. When
Bruce Hill, Jr. wrote:
>
>
>
> On March 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM Michael Mol wrote:
>
>> Don't forget you're using Gentoo; you're implicitly not very far
>> removed from the skill levels of the developers themselves.
>>
>>
>> --
>> :wq
>>
>
> Maybe you're not, but it only takes me a few minutes be
On 03/12/12 16:24, Joseph wrote:
I'm using "slim" on both computers and it seems to me they both have the same
configuration but on one of them "ck-list-sessions" is showing that tty7 is started twice.
and it is using the sessiont with "active = FALSE" so my logout buttons are
grayed out.
ck-l
Volker Armin Hemmann writes:
> and of course we all just use our crystal balls because it is so easy
> without the error message.
Hmm, something about X shutting down in kdm.log. Can't check now because
the system is down. But anyway, I don't think it matters, the problem is
that the crash happen
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Dale wrote:
> Bruce Hill, Jr. wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On March 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM Michael Mol wrote:
>>
>>> Don't forget you're using Gentoo; you're implicitly not very far
>>> removed from the skill levels of the developers themselves.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> :wq
>>>
>>
>
On 13/03/12 00:34, »Q« wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:29:10 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Anyone care to offer an opinion on what it will take to get PROVIDES
support in portage?
IMO, it would take virtuals causing so many headachy breakages that
some devs started keeping up a steady drumbeat on
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:54:30 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >> Anyone care to offer an opinion on what it will take to get PROVIDES
> >> support in portage?
> >
> > IMO, it would take virtuals causing so many headachy breakages that
> > some devs started keeping up a steady drumbeat on irc an
From: Dale [mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 7:23 PM
> I like that quote. I may not be dev material but I know this /usr mess
> is not right. The only reason it is happening is because of one or two
> distros that push it to make it easier for themselves.
If that's ho
At first , my /etc/slim.conf is the default config . then i change to yours
, it didn't work ... Can i find some log to figure out something ?
在 2012年3月12日 下午1:46，Willie Matthews 写道：
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:26:40 +0800
> 赵佳晖 wrote:
>
> > Hello , everyone . I have install the xfce-meta foll
On Monday 12 March 2012 12:21:17 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 22:34:27 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > My mother swears blind I watched England win the World Cup but I
> > don't remember (being only 1 year old at the time).
>
> I fell asleep during it. To be fair I was nine and had j
On 13/03/12 02:23, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:54:30 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Anyone care to offer an opinion on what it will take to get PROVIDES
support in portage?
IMO, it would take virtuals causing so many headachy breakages that
some devs started keeping up a stea
i find “/usr/bin.xauth: file /var/run/slim.auth does not exist” in my
/var/log/slim.log , did this has some connection to my problem?
在 2012年3月13日 上午10:26，赵佳晖 写道：
> At first , my /etc/slim.conf is the default config . then i change to
> yours , it didn't work ... Can i find some log to figure o
On Mar 13, 2012 9:05 AM, "Mike Edenfield" wrote:
>
> From: Dale [mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 7:23 PM
>
> > I like that quote. I may not be dev material but I know this /usr mess
> > is not right. The only reason it is happening is because of one or two
> > distr
I am seriously thinking of splitting the storage of directories under /usr,
e.g., /usr/portage and /usr/source actually living somewhere else, on
different partition and different filesystem. Let's say something mounted
on /mnt/Persistent.
My question: should I use bindmount or symlinks to do that
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> I am seriously thinking of splitting the storage of directories under /usr,
> e.g., /usr/portage and /usr/source actually living somewhere else, on
> different partition and different filesystem. Let's say something mounted on
> /mnt/Persiste
Try to run XFCE without having slim running. So lets stop xdm from starting
by running /etc/init.d/xdm stop then you can try to run xfce by issuing the
command startxfce4 or run startx.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:52 PM, 赵佳晖 wrote:
> i find “/usr/bin.xauth: file /var/run/slim.auth does not exist”
I recently decided to update my AMD64 box from 2.38 to the new 3.2 kernel.
I used genkernel all to compile the upgraded kernel but when I go to boot
I get the following error.
>>Loading modules
>>Determining root device
!!Block device /dev/sdb2 is not a valid root device
!!Could not find the root
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:11, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> I am seriously thinking of splitting the storage of directories under /usr,
>> e.g., /usr/portage and /usr/source actually living somewhere else, on
>> different partition and diff
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:11, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>> I am seriously thinking of splitting the storage of directories under /usr,
>>> e.g., /usr/portage and /usr/source actual
65 matches
Mail list logo
