In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
> On 12/05/11 13:37, Gregory Shearman wrote:
>>In linux.gentoo.user, Joseph wrote:
>>> I'm upgrading form posgresql 9.0 to 9.1, it seem to the upgrade went OK but
>>> when try to transfer the data
>>> base:
>>> pg_upgrade91 -v --old-datadir=/var/lib/postgresql/9.0/
Alan McKinnon writes:
> Yes, I see the latest screenshot now. Must have missed that one.
>
> Harry, that error almost always indicates you do not have the drivers
> for PIIX compiled into the kernel. I assume you are not using an
> initramfs so that driver must be compiled in, not a module.
>
> I
$ cat /etc/asound.conf
pcm.pulse {
type pulse
}
ctl.pulse {
type pulse
}
pcm.!default {
type pulse
}
ctl.!default {
type pulse
}
Do you have this?
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 03:40:01PM +0100, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> > For the OP, a few posters have mentioned that under gentoo, every
> > thing is compiled from scratch, but it was not made clear that it
> > happens again and again at most upda
On , Claudio Roberto França Pereira wrote:
$ cat /etc/asound.conf
pcm.pulse {
type pulse
}
ctl.pulse {
type pulse
}
pcm.!default {
type pulse
}
ctl.!default {
type pulse
}
Do you have this?
Yes, and also /etc/firefox/firefoxrc containing FIREFOX_DSP="padsp"
Thanks
Francisco
Michael Mol gmail.com> writes:
> Let's start with that dual-xeon box I was using to benchmark "emerge
> -e @world", figure I'm looking for how better to tune my MAKEOPTS and
> EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS variables, and assume I'd like to get more
> information about the following factors:
Complex and n
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Indi wrote:
> In fact, I like gentoo and FreeBSD best for low-spoec hardware.
What does low-spec hardware mean?
On 12/4/2011 10:29 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
I haven't yet needed to do this kind of system monitoring, so I'm very
much a newbie here.
Let's start with that dual-xeon box I was using to benchmark "emerge
-e @world", figure I'm looking for how better to tune my MAKEOPTS and
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS vari
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:01 PM, James wrote:
> Michael Mol gmail.com> writes:
>> Let's start with that dual-xeon box I was using to benchmark "emerge
>> -e @world", figure I'm looking for how better to tune my MAKEOPTS and
>> EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS variables, and assume I'd like to get more
>> info
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:10 PM, LinuxIsOne wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Indi wrote:
>
>> In fact, I like gentoo and FreeBSD best for low-spoec hardware.
>
> What does low-spec hardware mean?
Whatever the default setup of the latest release of Ubuntu runs
sluggish on. (Or what a pre
> Yes, and also /etc/firefox/firefoxrc containing FIREFOX_DSP="padsp"
>
> Thanks
> Francisco
I can't reproduce this. I'm using ~amd64, firefox 8, pulseaudio 1.1.
Do you have multiple sound cards or sound output devices? Maybe the
sound is going to another sink that the one you expected? I'm under
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Albert W. Hopkins
wrote:
> IIRC, libreoffice was released with *experimental* support for gtk3, and
> have acknowledged that there are issues with the gtk3 port. However
> Gentoo decided to enable gtk3 support by default. However it *should*
> work as expected whe
>From the first post, you've ran, under grub, setup (hd0,0). This
installs grub on the first partition boot loader, you want to install
it on the DISK boot loader, on the MBR. Maybe gparted fixed that for
you. The correct way would be to run:
root (hd0,0) //indicate where grub stage 1.5 and 2 are.
On 12/05/11 21:56, Gregory Shearman wrote:
hmmm...
Which directory are you running the command from? I ran mine from
/var/lib/postgresql which has the properties:
drwxr-xr-x 4 postgres root
I don't recall using the command "pg_upgrade91", but I see that it is a
symlink to /usr/lib/postgresql-9
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> What does low-spec hardware mean?
>
> Whatever the default setup of the latest release of Ubuntu runs
> sluggish on. (Or what a previous version of Ubuntu ran on, but current
> versions won't)
>
> While somewhat flippant, that seems a pretty r
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 12:10:52 -0500
LinuxIsOne wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Indi
> wrote:
>
> > In fact, I like gentoo and FreeBSD best for low-spoec hardware.
>
> What does low-spec hardware mean?
Anything that isn't for sale in shops anymore.
--
Alan McKinnnon
alan.mckin...@g
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 06:40:03PM +0100, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:10 PM, LinuxIsOne wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Indi wrote:
> >
> >> In fact, I like gentoo and FreeBSD best for low-spoec hardware.
> >
> > What does low-spec hardware mean?
>
> Whatever the d
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Indi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 06:40:03PM +0100, Michael Mol wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:10 PM, LinuxIsOne wrote:
>> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Indi
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> In fact, I like gentoo and FreeBSD best for low-spoec hardware.
>> >
I'm giving Gentoo another try, having been using Ubuntu for quite a while,
and more recently Mint. I would like to be able to access Mint until the
Gentoo system is working as I'd like it.
I have gotten through the install, for the most part, up to grub. I can
see how to edit the grub.conf file
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 12:23:28 -0800
"Alan E. Davis" wrote:
> I'm giving Gentoo another try, having been using Ubuntu for quite a
> while, and more recently Mint. I would like to be able to access
> Mint until the Gentoo system is working as I'd like it.
>
> I have gotten through the install, for
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Dual boot scenarios get tricky, it is vital to assume nothing. You left
> out a lot of info, so I have to make some reasonable assumptions. Reply
> with corrections if we're going to wrong route.
>
> You can only have one primary bootloader,
On 2011-12-05, Michael Mol wrote:
>
>> You can only have one primary bootloader, either grub from Gentoo or
>> grub2 from Mint, it cannot be both. But it looks like that's what you
>> do have. Seeing as you intend to drop Mint eventually, you must
>> uninstall grub2 and all it's files from Mint.
>
In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
> On 12/05/11 21:56, Gregory Shearman wrote:
>>hmmm...
>>
>>Which directory are you running the command from? I ran mine from
>>/var/lib/postgresql which has the properties:
>>
>>drwxr-xr-x 4 postgres root
>>
>>I don't recall using the command "pg_upgrade91", but I
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 16:49:21 -0500
Michael Mol wrote:
> > You can only have one primary bootloader, either grub from Gentoo or
> > grub2 from Mint, it cannot be both. But it looks like that's what
> > you do have. Seeing as you intend to drop Mint eventually, you must
> > uninstall grub2 and all i
On Monday 05 Dec 2011 21:58:44 Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2011-12-05, Michael Mol wrote:
> >> You can only have one primary bootloader, either grub from Gentoo or
> >> grub2 from Mint, it cannot be both. But it looks like that's what you
> >> do have. Seeing as you intend to drop Mint eventually, y
On Monday 05 Dec 2011 20:20:38 Michael Mol wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Indi wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 06:40:03PM +0100, Michael Mol wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:10 PM, LinuxIsOne wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Indi
wrote:
> >> >> In fact, I like ge
On 2011-12-05, Mick wrote:
> On Monday 05 Dec 2011 21:58:44 Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2011-12-05, Michael Mol wrote:
>> >> You can only have one primary bootloader, either grub from Gentoo or
>> >> grub2 from Mint, it cannot be both. But it looks like that's what you
>> >> do have. Seeing as you
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 12:23:28 -0800, Alan E. Davis wrote:
> I'm giving Gentoo another try, having been using Ubuntu for quite a
> while, and more recently Mint. I would like to be able to access Mint
> until the Gentoo system is working as I'd like it.
>
> I have gotten through the install, for th
> Here's the entirety of my main.cf postscreen section for reference. I've
> deemed these safe, but you shouldn't enable them without reading what they
> do!
>
>
> #
> # Postscreen settings
> #
>
> postscreen_greet_action = enforce
>
> postscreen_dnsbl_sites =
> psbl.surriel.com,
> bl
On Dec 6, 2011 7:19 AM, "Grant" wrote:
>
> > Here's the entirety of my main.cf postscreen section for reference. I've
> > deemed these safe, but you shouldn't enable them without reading what
they
> > do!
> >
> >
> > #
> > # Postscreen settings
> > #
> >
> > postscreen_greet_action = enforce
> >
>
Are you sure you've re-emerged the package after adding the bzip2 use
flag? Run eix app-crypt/gnupg to confirm.
On 12/05/2011 07:45 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
> I've looked up each of those parameters and they sound fine to me.
> How long have you been running them? Have you been notified of any
> mistakenly rejected mail? It's very important my server doesn't miss
> any mail, even if it means deali
Claudio Roberto França Pereira writes:
> From the first post, you've ran, under grub, setup (hd0,0). This
> installs grub on the first partition boot loader, you want to install
> it on the DISK boot loader, on the MBR. Maybe gparted fixed that for
> you. The correct way would be to run:
> root (
On Dec 6, 2011 7:58 AM, "Michael Orlitzky" wrote:
>
> On 12/05/2011 07:45 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>
>>
>> >
>> > I've looked up each of those parameters and they sound fine to me.
>> > How long have you been running them? Have you been notified of any
>> > mistakenly rejected mail? It's ver
On Dec 6, 2011 8:00 AM, "Harry Putnam" wrote:
>
> Claudio Roberto França Pereira writes:
>
> > From the first post, you've ran, under grub, setup (hd0,0). This
> > installs grub on the first partition boot loader, you want to install
> > it on the DISK boot loader, on the MBR. Maybe gparted fixed
On 12/05/2011 08:01 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
Four months without a false positive? Good enough for me. Where do I
sign? :-)
main.cf
=)
After xorg-server installed, I follow the description in the handbook using
Xorg -configre. Unfortunately , it failed . The message is below:
[ 621.762] _XSERVTransSocketOpenCOTSServer: Unable to open socket for inet6
[ 621.762] _XSERVTransOpen: transport open failed for inet6/Matrix:0
[ 6
Yeah, just for simplicity. This way you just have one extended file
system driver that works for the second, third and forth version of
the file system.
Did you try to build a kernel without network facilities?
>> > I've looked up each of those parameters and they sound fine to me.
>> > How long have you been running them? Have you been notified of any
>> > mistakenly rejected mail? It's very important my server doesn't miss
>> > any mail, even if it means dealing with more spam.
>> >
>>
>> Similar
At 2011-12-06 10:52:35,"Claudio Roberto França Pereira"
wrote:
>Did you try to build a kernel without network facilities?
>
What's that meaning? I built kernel with necessary drivers, of course I have a
work-fine networkafter Gentoo built up . Does it have anything to do with X ?
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 08:26:07AM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote
> That is for the new attempt... I have yet to try booting it, but from
> your suggestions it sounds like I may have it right this time.
>
> I posted another screen grab but never saw it show up here. Trying again
>
>http://www.jt
On 12/05/2011 10:24 PM, Grant wrote:
What about trouble with the DNSBL lists? I know when I changed my IP
address I had to work to get the new one removed from a few blacklists
it had previously been placed on. I wasn't sending spam, but my
messages would have been blocked under that config if
What video card do you have? Did you build the drivers for it?
On Monday 05 Dec 2011 23:33:12 Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2011-12-05, Mick wrote:
> > On Monday 05 Dec 2011 21:58:44 Grant Edwards wrote:
> >> On 2011-12-05, Michael Mol wrote:
> >> >> You can only have one primary bootloader, either grub from Gentoo or
> >> >> grub2 from Mint, it cannot be both.
maybe there are filesystem corrupt on the device, or smthng related to
the connection to the host, maybe supported filesystems not compiled
in kernel, maybe coding for FAT set is not correct in kernel?
46 matches
Mail list logo
