Alberto Luaces writes:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Paul Hartman writes:
>
>> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Alberto Luaces wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have searched quite a bit for an error I'm having when emerging
>>> current zlib-1.2.5-r2. The problem is that somehow the soname is not
>>> written in the
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:20:57 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > Forcing nano into @system goes against the whole idea of using
> > virtuals to specify required functionality, rather than requiring a
> > specific program.
> >
>
> That's what I thought until I moved to the kde profile, at which time
>
> I exaggerated. The number of kde packages pulled in on my compute
> server right now is about 10, so it's not as bad as I remember.
I have a bunch of systems (desktop and client) and none of them pull in
any KDE libs save one, which has kde-meta in the world file. Not even
my mythtv box, which
On 07/06/2011 23:16, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/08/2011 12:17 AM, Matt Harrison wrote:
[...]
Well I eventually managed to get the vmwgfx gallium driver to compile,
but I get an undefined symbol when trying to load it with xorg. I'll
give up with it now unless anyone else has an idea. It was
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Albert Hopkins wrote:
>
>> I exaggerated. The number of kde packages pulled in on my compute
>> server right now is about 10, so it's not as bad as I remember.
>
> I have a bunch of systems (desktop and client) and none of them pull in
> any KDE libs save one, which
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 07:09 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> >> I exaggerated. The number of kde packages pulled in on my compute
> >> server right now is about 10, so it's not as bad as I remember.
> >
> > I have a bunch of systems (desktop and client) and none of them pull
> in
should have been "(des
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 07:09 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> And all of these machines are using the kde profile?
>
> Of course not. Why would you put a server (or anything else) in the kde
> profile unless you wanted to pull in KDE stuff?
The
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 07:37 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Then you missed the point of the thread.
Quite possibly.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Alberto Luaces wrote:
> Alberto Luaces writes:
>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> Paul Hartman writes:
>>
>>> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Alberto Luaces wrote:
Hello,
I have searched quite a bit for an error I'm having when emerging
current zlib-1.2.5-r2
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 07:37 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> Then you missed the point of the thread.
>
> Quite possibly.
Actually, my comment was unfair and I apologize. If you didn't happen
to read every part of the thread then your point is v
On Tuesday 07 June 2011 20:27:45 Dale wrote:
1&1:
Test mit IPv4 DNS Eintrag
ok (0.712s) verwende ipv4
Test mit IPv6 DNS Eintrag
ok (0.712s) verwende ipv6 6to4
Test mit Dual Stack DNS Eintrag
ok (0.726s) verwende ipv4
Test mit Dual Stack und grosse Pakete
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Tuesday 07 June 2011 20:27:45 Dale wrote:
1&1:
Test mit IPv4 DNS Eintrag
ok (0.712s) verwende ipv4
Test mit IPv6 DNS Eintrag
ok (0.712s) verwende ipv6 6to4
Test mit Dual Stack DNS Eintrag
ok (0.726s) verwende ipv4
Test mit D
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Dale wrote:
> Funny thing is, I use googles DNS servers. 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 are the
> settings. I find it ironic that Google is one of the ones hosting this
> event and it appears their server is not ready. Makes me think. < Dale
> scratches chin a bit >
>From
2011/6/8 Volker Armin Hemmann :
> 1&1:
>
> Test mit IPv4 DNS Eintrag
> ok (0.712s) verwende ipv4
> Test mit IPv6 DNS Eintrag
> ok (0.712s) verwende ipv6 6to4
> Test mit Dual Stack DNS Eintrag
> ok (0.726s) verwende ipv4
> Test mit Dual Stack und grosse Pakete
> ok (0.665s) verwende ipv4
> Test IPv4
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Dale wrote:
> Should I have the USE flag ipv6 enabled or should I leave it off for now?
> If so, anyone had any trouble with it or is this a trivial change?
Enable the IPv6 stuff in kernel, enable ipv6 USE flag in your
make.conf, rebuild any packages that were -ip
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:45 on Wednesday 08 June 2011, Paul Hartman
did opine thusly:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Dale wrote:
> > Funny thing is, I use googles DNS servers. 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 are the
> > settings. I find it ironic that Google is one of the ones hosting this
>
A recent update seems to have broken sshd. It no longer starts when
it should. It seems to refuse to start up unless eth0 is up. For years
I've had the following in /etc/conf.d/rc
RC_NET_STRICT_CHECKING="lo"
According to the comments that means that the "net" service is up as
long as at least
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:18 on Wednesday 08 June 2011, Grant Edwards
did opine thusly:
> A recent update seems to have broken sshd. It no longer starts when
> it should. It seems to refuse to start up unless eth0 is up. For years
> I've had the following in /etc/conf.d/rc
>
> RC_NET
On 2011-06-08, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 22:18 on Wednesday 08 June 2011, Grant
> Edwards
> did opine thusly:
>
>> A recent update seems to have broken sshd. It no longer starts when
>> it should. It seems to refuse to start up unless eth0 is up. For years
>> I've
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:56:46 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>
>> > Did anyone find a solution to this? Re-emerging the various packages
>> > mentioned made no difference, and it gives the same error run as
>> > root, so permissions aren't
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:43 on Wednesday 08 June 2011, Grant Edwards
did opine thusly:
> On 2011-06-08, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 22:18 on Wednesday 08 June 2011, Grant
> > Edwards
> >
> > did opine thusly:
> >> A recent update seems to have broken sshd.
On 2011-06-08, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 22:43 on Wednesday 08 June 2011, Grant
> Edwards
>
>> # Do we allow any started service in the runlevel to satisfy the
>> dependency # or do we want all of them regardless of state? For example,
>> if net.eth0 # and net.eth1
On Wednesday 08 Jun 2011 20:51:10 Paul Hartman wrote:
> 2011/6/8 Volker Armin Hemmann :
> > 1&1:
> >
> > Test mit IPv4 DNS Eintrag
> > ok (0.712s) verwende ipv4
> > Test mit IPv6 DNS Eintrag
> > ok (0.712s) verwende ipv6 6to4
> > Test mit Dual Stack DNS Eintrag
> > ok (0.726s) verwende ipv4
> > Te
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 Jun 2011 20:51:10 Paul Hartman wrote:
>>
>> Charter Communications cable internet:
>>
>> Test with IPv4 DNS record
>> ok (0.580s) using ipv4
>> Test with IPv6 DNS record
>> ok (0.268s) using ipv6
>> Test with Dual Stack DNS record
>> ok
-original message-
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IPv6 not ready here; Hmmm
From: Paul Hartman
Date: 2011-06-09 08:25
>And now I'll try not to talk about Windows on this list again for the
>remainder of the year. ;)
Naaah, is okay... as long as you don't do it excessively :)
Sometimes we Linux-peop
Paul Hartman wrote:
Enable the IPv6 stuff in kernel, enable ipv6 USE flag in your
make.conf, rebuild any packages that were -ipv6 before, and you should
be good to go from a basics standpoint.
After that, you need actual IPv6 service from your ISP (and modem and
router), or tunnel over IPv4 thr
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 09:15, Dale wrote:
>
> Now what was I thinking. Oh, wait. I wasn't thinking. There was the
> problem right there. I hadn't enabled any of the IPv6 stuff in the kernel.
> Jeeez, what a idiot. I haven't even thought of the kernel settings. <
> sighs >
>
You owe me a new
On Wednesday 08 June 2011 13:59:36 Dale wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 07 June 2011 20:27:45 Dale wrote:
> >
> >
> > 1&1:
> >
> > Test mit IPv4 DNS Eintrag
> > ok (0.712s) verwende ipv4
> > Test mit IPv6 DNS Eintrag
> > ok (0.712s) verwende ipv6 6to4
> > Test mit Dual Stack
Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 09:15, Dale wrote:
Now what was I thinking. Oh, wait. I wasn't thinking. There was the
problem right there. I hadn't enabled any of the IPv6 stuff in the kernel.
Jeeez, what a idiot. I haven't even thought of the kernel settings.<
sighs>
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Read the FAQ and Info posted.
> From the website:
If this test fails: it means that the DNS resolver you are using, requires
IPv4 to reach the DNS authoritative servers of your favoriate web sites. In
the near future, every web site of consequence will remain accessib
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Dale wrote:
> I'm just hoping html5 will improve some things. May not but doesn't hurt to
> hope. I just hope it will eliminate some of the things that are such power
> or memory hogs now. It may not at first but eventually
Some stuff is already looking good, o
On Thursday 09 Jun 2011 02:25:43 Paul Hartman wrote:
> My wireless router is running DD-WRT (which is a Linux distro). It is
> running kernel 2.6.34 and has all the ipv6 modules enabled in the
> kernel. Basically, it is setup by loading the "sit" module
> (CONFIG_IPV6_SIT_6RD in kernel config). Th
Okay, what's going on here...
While `emerge grub` I got "configure: error: unsupported CPU type"
Here's "/var/tmp/portage/sys-boot/grub-0.97-r10/work/grub-0.97/config.log" :
This file contains any messages produced by compilers while
running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mista
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Dale wrote:
I'm just hoping html5 will improve some things. May not but doesn't hurt to
hope. I just hope it will eliminate some of the things that are such power
or memory hogs now. It may not at first but eventually
Some stuff
34 matches
Mail list logo
