I am running default/linux/amd64/10.0/no-multilib profile, and I got the
following news item, after syncing this morning:
# eselect news read
2011-05-01-baselayout-update
Title Baselayout update
AuthorChristian Faulhammer
AuthorWi
Let me add that my system defaults to the _stable_ software branch.
On Monday 02 May 2011 10:11:06 Thanasis wrote:
> Let me add that my system defaults to the _stable_ software branch.
Thanks for the heads up. :)
It seems then that Baselayout2/OpenRC is being rolled out to stable. I'll be
unmasking and updating a couple of boxen today, taking advantage of some
On Monday 02 May 2011 10:03:11 Thanasis wrote:
> I am running default/linux/amd64/10.0/no-multilib profile, and I got the
> following news item, after syncing this morning:
>
> # eselect news read
>
> 2011-05-01-baselayout-update
> Title Baselayout update
> Author
On Monday 02 May 2011 10:43:59 Mick wrote:
> On Monday 02 May 2011 10:03:11 Thanasis wrote:
> > I am running default/linux/amd64/10.0/no-multilib profile, and I got the
> > following news item, after syncing this morning:
> >
> > # eselect news read
> >
> > 2011-05-01-baselayout-update
> >
> >
on 05/02/2011 12:43 PM Mick wrote the following:
>
>> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/openrc-migration.xml
>
> I've been through the migration guide. In the section about udev it mentions
> /etc/runlevels/sysinit. Is this something added by baselayout2/OpenRC? I
> don't seem to have this in my r
Thanasis wrote:
Let me add that my system defaults to the _stable_ software branch.
They are giving a heads up that the update is coming. I think it is
going stable in a few days, about a week since the package was added to
stable.
I'm just hoping this will be a clean upgrade. They
on 05/02/2011 01:05 PM Mick wrote the following:
> Another thing I found, is some incongruity about the file in which the
> $EDITOR
> and $PAGER should be defined.
>
> The migration guide says:
>
> "The EDITOR variable is no longer found in /etc/rc.conf. Both EDITOR and
> PAGER
> are set by def
On Monday 02 May 2011 11:26:27 you wrote:
> on 05/02/2011 01:05 PM Mick wrote the following:
> > Another thing I found, is some incongruity about the file in which the
> > $EDITOR and $PAGER should be defined.
> >
> > The migration guide says:
> >
> > "The EDITOR variable is no longer found in /e
on 05/02/2011 01:50 PM Mick wrote the following:
> Not sure if there is a difference between an env.d variable and a
> profile.d variable.
Me neither, but I think you should add it to env.d
In my system only a couple of packages (namely dev-java/java-config and
sys-fs/udisks) use profile.d
All ot
Mick writes:
> On Monday 02 May 2011 11:26:27 you wrote:
> Thanks. Not sure if there is a difference between an env.d variable and
> a profile.d variable.
None you will notice, both /etc/profile.env and scripts in /etc/profile.d/
are sourced in /etc/profile. profile.env contains all stuff in /
On Monday 02 May 2011 12:52:12 Alex Schuster wrote:
> Mick writes:
> > On Monday 02 May 2011 11:26:27 you wrote:
> >
> > Thanks. Not sure if there is a difference between an env.d variable and
> > a profile.d variable.
>
> None you will notice, both /etc/profile.env and scripts in /etc/profile.d
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 10:20:03PM +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Carlos Sura writes:
>
> > I just have one question, reciently I read in a forum that HAL might be
> > deprecated on Gentoo, so, I started using UDEV:
> >
> > USE=" -hal udev"
> >
> > But, then I have this problem, updating xorg-se
Hi all!
i was going through a world update today and during --depclean emerge throw
an error complaining about possible corrupted binaries or hw failure.
since then it has stopped working, no matter what i try to emerge, the
command simply return to the shell without any kind of error or any other
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:38 on Monday 02 May 2011, Davide Carnovale
did opine thusly:
> Hi all!
> i was going through a world update today and during --depclean emerge throw
> an error complaining about possible corrupted binaries or hw failure.
> since then it has stopped working, no m
On 05/02/2011 05:38:03 PM, Davide Carnovale wrote:
> Hi all!
> i was going through a world update today and during --depclean emerge
> throw
> an error complaining about possible corrupted binaries or hw failure.
> since then it has stopped working, no matter what i try to emerge,
> the
> command
@alan, no error are printed, where and what should i look for in the logs?
@helmut python just returns to the console, without error or effect of any
sort, does it means python has get unmerged and that's why emerge doesn't
work anymore?
2011/5/2 Helmut Jarausch
> On 05/02/2011 05:38:03 PM, Dav
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Adam Carter wrote:
>
> How do I find out where/if Apache thinks its logging things?
>>
>>
> In /etc/apache check httpd.conf and modules.d/00_mod_log_config.conf
>
in /etc/apache2, I find
ServerRoot "/usr/lib/apache2"
but no log files, and no special logfile p
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:04:35 -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>
> > I just noticed a failure in a dynamic web page that I haven't touched
> > in years. So I looked in
> > /var/log/apache2 and found that no files have been touched since
> > Febru
Hi, Davide.
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 03:38:03PM +, Davide Carnovale wrote:
> Hi all!
> i was going through a world update today and during --depclean emerge throw
> an error complaining about possible corrupted binaries or hw failure.
> since then it has stopped working, no matter what i try to
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> On Thursday 28 April 2011 20:28:14 Paul Hartman wrote:
>
>> I don't see kompozer in portage at all. Is it in an overlay?
>
> Now that you ask, I don't remember how I came by it, but I have an ebuild and
> so
> on in /usr/local/portage. I wa
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Davide Carnovale <
francesco.davide.carnov...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2011/5/2 Helmut Jarausch
>
>> On 05/02/2011 05:38:03 PM, Davide Carnovale wrote:
>> > Hi all!
>> > i was going through a world update today and during --depclean emerge
>> > throw
>> > an error com
On Monday 02 May 2011 17:05:08 Davide Carnovale wrote:
> @alan, no error are printed, where and what should i look for in the logs?
>
> @helmut python just returns to the console, without error or effect of any
> sort, does it means python has get unmerged and that's why emerge doesn't
> work anym
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Mick wrote:
> On Monday 02 May 2011 10:11:06 Thanasis wrote:
>> Let me add that my system defaults to the _stable_ software branch.
>
> Thanks for the heads up. :)
>
> It seems then that Baselayout2/OpenRC is being rolled out to stable. I'll be
> unmasking and upd
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Davide Carnovale <
> francesco.davide.carnov...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> 2011/5/2 Helmut Jarausch
>>
>>> On 05/02/2011 05:38:03 PM, Davide Carnovale wrote:
>>> > Hi all!
>>> > i was going through a world
On Monday 02 May 2011 18:11:01 Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Mick wrote:
> > On Monday 02 May 2011 10:11:06 Thanasis wrote:
> >> Let me add that my system defaults to the _stable_ software branch.
> >
> > Thanks for the heads up. :)
> >
> > It seems then that Baselayout2/
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Mick wrote:
>
> I've unmasked the latest available after reading the changelogs:
>
> sys-apps/baselayout-2.0.2
>
> sys-apps/openrc-0.8.2-r1
>
> All seems to work fine here.
> --
> Regards,
> Mick
>
baselayout-2.0.2 seems like the obvious choice.
openrc-0.8.2-r
On Mon, 2 May 2011 10:11:01 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> How will you / did you decide what versions to unmask?
Does stable portage support the --autounmask option to emerge?
--
Neil Bothwick
"Do not handicap your children by making their lives easy."
-- Robert Heinlein
signature.asc
Descri
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Mick wrote:
>
> I'll guess, since everybody else is, that you updated python to 2.7, then
> did
> *NOT* run python-update, did not use eselect to change to 2.7, but *DID*
> run
> emerge --depclean which removed dev-lang/python-2.6.6-r2.
>
> that would be "python-u
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:04:35 -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>>
>> > I just noticed a failure in a dynamic web page that I haven't touched
>> > in years. So I looked in
>> > /var/l
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 2 May 2011 10:11:01 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> How will you / did you decide what versions to unmask?
>
> Does stable portage support the --autounmask option to emerge?
>
I use ~amd64 portage so I have supports that feature but w
On 2 May 2011 08:21, Indi wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 10:20:03PM +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
> > Carlos Sura writes:
> >
> > > I just have one question, reciently I read in a forum that HAL might be
> > > deprecated on Gentoo, so, I started using UDEV:
> > >
> > > USE=" -hal udev"
> > >
> >
On Mon, 2 May 2011 11:16:36 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > Does stable portage support the --autounmask option to emerge?
> I use ~amd64 portage so I have supports that feature but what command
> do I run today to unmask the version level they will make stable next
> week? (For instance 0.7 instea
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 2 May 2011 11:16:36 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> > Does stable portage support the --autounmask option to emerge?
>
>> I use ~amd64 portage so I have supports that feature but what command
>> do I run today to unmask the version lev
Hey Mark,
the news item does not tell the exact version because there might be sub/rc-
versions until release. so on release date the devs will remove keywords of
the right versions. i read the dev mailing list a bit and it should be
baselayout-2.0.2 + openrc-0.8.2-r1
if no further -rc will be
On Monday 02 May 2011 19:07:04 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Mick wrote:
> > I'll guess, since everybody else is, that you updated python to 2.7, then
> > did
> > *NOT* run python-update, did not use eselect to change to 2.7, but *DID*
> > run
> > emerge --depclean which
On Monday 02 May 2011 17:54:18 Paul Hartman wrote:
> I bet you got it from Bugzilla, because you're CC'ed on this:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146761
>
> :)
I bow to your superior detective-work. :-)
--
Rgds
Peter
Apparently, though unproven, at 19:10 on Monday 02 May 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:
> On Monday 02 May 2011 17:05:08 Davide Carnovale wrote:
> > @alan, no error are printed, where and what should i look for in the
> > logs?
> >
> > @helmut python just returns to the console, without error or eff
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:05 on Monday 02 May 2011, Davide Carnovale
did opine thusly:
> @alan, no error are printed, where and what should i look for in the logs?
It looks awfully like depclean took away your old version of python before you
used eselect. Others have posted details of
On Monday 02 May 2011 20:12:11 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday 02 May 2011 17:54:18 Paul Hartman wrote:
> > I bet you got it from Bugzilla, because you're CC'ed on this:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146761
> >
> > :)
>
> I bow to your superior detective-work. :-)
A bit O/T to
greets,
I assume that many of you earn your money by working w/ computers, in
IT, programming, hacking, "being root" ;-)
I do and I always have the nagging feeling that I somehow lose money by
not being able to easily track my work.
A typical workday consists of getting emails, receiving calls
On Monday 02 May 2011 22:33:03 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> greets,
>
> I assume that many of you earn your money by working w/ computers, in
> IT, programming, hacking, "being root" ;-)
>
> I do and I always have the nagging feeling that I somehow lose money by
> not being able to easily track
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Mon, 2 May 2011 11:16:36 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>>> > Does stable portage support the --autounmask option to emerge?
>>
>>> I use ~amd64 portage so I have supports that feature
On 2/5/2011, at 8:39pm, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> ...
> Two final DONTs:
>
> Never blindly accept what depclean says and let it do it's thing. Study the
> output, the warning printed on the screen to do just that is there for a
> reason.
>
> Never blindly update protected config files with etc-up
On 04/30/2011 04:53 PM, Adam Carter wrote:
I use nfs about twice/year to transfer large files between machines -- so
I'm quite an expert at praying to the computer gods to "please let this nfs
mount work just this one last time and I'll never bother you again, I
promise!"
I'm l
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:16 on Tuesday 03 May 2011, Stroller did
opine thusly:
> On 2/5/2011, at 8:39pm, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > ...
> > Two final DONTs:
> >
> > Never blindly accept what depclean says and let it do it's thing. Study
> > the output, the warning printed on the screen t
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:50:02PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>
> Never blindly accept what depclean says and let it do it's thing. Study the
> output, the warning printed on the screen to do just that is there for a
> reason.
>
> Never blindly update protected config files with etc-update
On 05/02/2011 02:43 AM, Mick wrote:
I've been through the migration guide. In the section about udev it mentions
/etc/runlevels/sysinit. Is this something added by baselayout2/OpenRC? I
don't seem to have this in my runlevels:
$ ls -l /etc/runlevels/
total 16
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jan
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 06:36:58PM +0100, Mick wrote:
> I've unmasked the latest available after reading the changelogs:
>
> sys-apps/baselayout-2.0.2
>
> sys-apps/openrc-0.8.2-r1
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=295613
You are correct about the versions.
William
pgpoZK7YWDjzo.pgp
De
>
>> Okay, there was already a thread about that, and my Python problem seems
> solved. I still have no log entries.
>
>
Ok, as root, try lsof | grep apache and see if there are any open log files.
You may need to emerge lsof first if you dont already have it.
IIRC apache fails to start if it can
On Monday 02 May 2011 23:07:00 Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2 May 2011 11:16:36 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> >>> > Does stable portage support the --autounmask option to emerge?
> >>>
51 matches
Mail list logo
