On 27. 3. 2011 8:50, Remy Blank wrote:
Try re-emerging setuptools.
On 27. 3. 2011 8:51, Adam Carter wrote:
> emerge --oneshot dev-python/setuptools would be a good start. (FWIW
> google "cracklib No module named setuptools"...)
Thanks, this work! So it seems to me, the right procedure is:
1. e
Am 27.03.2011 00:14, schrieb Matt Harrison:
> Hi list,
>
> I really don't know where to go to find out this information so I am hoping
> that
> someone here can point me in the right direction. I worry that most
> information out
> there on this subject is somewhat..."suspicious" in nature and I
In linux.gentoo.user, James wrote:
>
>What I would really like is to be able to exchange encrypted mail
>with any MS user
What, you've never received an encrypted email from a windows user
before? If you think about it, surely you have...
I know ms is pretty bad about standards and interoperabil
On Sunday 27 March 2011 08:41:47 Jarry wrote:
> On 27. 3. 2011 8:50, Remy Blank wrote:
> > Try re-emerging setuptools.
>
> On 27. 3. 2011 8:51, Adam Carter wrote:
> > emerge --oneshot dev-python/setuptools would be a good start. (FWIW
> > google "cracklib No module named setuptools"...)
>
> Tha
On Sunday 27 March 2011 10:03:58 Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 27.03.2011 00:14, schrieb Matt Harrison:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I really don't know where to go to find out this information so I am
> > hoping that someone here can point me in the right direction. I worry
> > that most information out th
> ... and run 4. and 5. above in the wrong order?
>
> In the e-warning words of --depclean itself:
>
> "* Depclean may break link level dependencies. Thus, it is
> * recommended to use a tool such as `revdep-rebuild` ... "
>
Agreed, revdep last. I always run depclean with pretend first. If depcle
On Sunday 27 March 2011 03:03:30 James wrote:
> Sebastian Beßler darkmetatron.de> writes:
> > Mail encryption is, as far as I know, something that works on the
> > client-side only. The mail server doesn't see the encryption, encrypted
> > mails contain only text, just like every other mail.
>
>
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
> Hi,
> I want to rsync all the directories and files that contain the date
> "2011.03.03".
> Everything else should not be copied.
> I did a lot of experiments and read web pages, but can't solve this
> conundrum.
>
> kfir@goofy /tmp/rsync.test $
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I want to rsync all the directories and files that contain the date
>> "2011.03.03".
>> Everything else should not be copied.
>> I did a lot of experiments and read web pages, but can't
Mick gmail.com> writes:
> Google has many examples and step-by-step instructions for configuring
> Outlook
> to use SSL Certs (S/MIME), usually by the purveyors of all these expensive
> certificate services:
> http://www.globalsign.com/support/personal-certificate/per_outlook07.html
Hello M
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 14:33:14 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> > Aren't those manually added to the list by python-updater? So you
>> > need to use -dmanual to prevent further rebuilding of them.
>
>> I guess I'm not clear on the use of 'manual'
Le 27/03/2011 17:26, Mark Knecht a écrit :
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 14:33:14 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
Aren't those manually added to the list by python-updater? So you
need to use -dmanual to prevent further rebuilding of them.
>>
Hi All,
See output below. I understand what this is telling me. However, the
issue is if I unmask libkexiv2 and kipi-plugins, I get further messages
about some other kde package that is masked by ~x86 keyword. And this
goes on continuously.
If I do emerge --pretend --update --deep --skip-
Wanting to try Firefox 4.0 , I tried to emerge Xulrunner 2.0
& ran into this problem :
root:526 profile> emerge -pv xulrunner
...
net-libs/xulrunner-2.0 [1.9.2.15] USE="-alsa -crashreporter%
-custom-optimization dbus -debug (-gnome%) -ipc (-java%*) -libnotify
-startup-n
I would look at python 3 - I couldn't emerge until only 2.6 was active. I
don't know how but on the new machine I set up, python3 was selected as
active, I set it back to 2.6 and everything was fine. From the output I can
see there is a version of python 3 active. Maybe a red herring, if so, I
apo
According to my local portage mirror, kipi-plugins-1.9.0 is currently
~x86. There's probably a stray line in
your /etc/portage/package.keywords which unmasks kipi-plugins-1.9.0.
The latest stable is kipi-plugins-1.2.0-r3 which is happy with
libkexiv2-4.4.5-r1, which in turn is stable for x86.
-rz
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 08:26:10 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > Manual means manually added to the list by python-updater, rather than
> > using any sort of detection.
> >
>
> OK, I won't bother with the many definitions of the word manual or how
> that effects the conversation from my end 'cause th
eselect list is not correct.
Use: eselect *python *list (or whatever other app you wish to select a
specific version of)
Then:
eselect python set (with the number of the option you want which was
displayed from 'eselect python list').
2011/3/26 Andrzej Styczeń
> On Saturday 26 of March 2011 17
On Sunday 27 March 2011 15:48:53 James wrote:
> Mick gmail.com> writes:
> > Google has many examples and step-by-step instructions for configuring
> > Outlook to use SSL Certs (S/MIME), usually by the purveyors of all these
> > expensive certificate services:
> >
> > http://www.globalsign.com/sup
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 08:26:10 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> > Manual means manually added to the list by python-updater, rather than
>> > using any sort of detection.
>> >
>>
>> OK, I won't bother with the many definitions of the word manual
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:50:57 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > I've also been hit by the first, as I think I mentioned. As for the
> > other two, re-emerging a binary package won't help at all, because
> > it's a binary package, so you unpack it rather than rebuild it.
> > That's more a problem with u
Hi - if you want to be able to send encrypted email from a linux machine
that a person using a windows machine can de-crypt and read securely, the
simplest way is to use the Gpg4win (for the windows machine) which
incorporates Claws Mail (a port of a linux email client which is also
available on Ge
Hi - you don't give the name of the python version to eselect python set,
you give it the number of the option (usually 1 or 2) next to the version
you want, which you saw when running 'eselect python list'
On 27 March 2011 08:41, Jarry wrote:
> On 27. 3. 2011 8:50, Remy Blank wrote:
>
>> Try re
You can allow it to install the masked packages by typing:
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge --update --deep world (you can also use
--keep-going, instead of --skip-first and it will try and continue when it
finds errors).
Actually, you can only use ~x86 if you are using an i686 or whatever (no
good
I just got an email from cron on my ~amd64 machine, containing these lines:
Checking 'find'... INFECTED
Checking 'netstat'... INFECTED
Took me a few minutes to deduce that sys-forensics/chkrootkit was the source
of those messages. I ran chkrootkit manually and found the same messages in
the out
Hello,
I performed the system update today (emerge -uND @world), and now I get errors
"One of the files in /etc/{conf.d,init.d} or /etc/rc.conf has a modification
time in the future!" at boot.
If I do
touch /tmp/tmp.file
find /etc -newer /tmp/temp.file
I get
/etc/
/etc/adjtime
/etc/mtab
Then
On Monday 28 March 2011 01:14:05 Alexey Mishustin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I performed the system update today (emerge -uND @world), and now I get
> errors "One of the files in /etc/{conf.d,init.d} or /etc/rc.conf has a
> modification time in the future!" at boot.
>
> If I do
> touch /tmp/tmp.file
>
Alexey Mishustin writes:
> I performed the system update today (emerge -uND @world), and now I
> get errors "One of the files in /etc/{conf.d,init.d} or /etc/rc.conf
> has a modification time in the future!" at boot.
[...]
> I get
> /etc/
> /etc/adjtime
> /etc/mtab
[...]
> But it doesn't help. Da
28 марта 2011 г., 1:22:27, Volker Armin Hemmann пишет:
> On Monday 28 March 2011 01:14:05 Alexey Mishustin wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I performed the system update today (emerge -uND @world), and now I get
>> errors "One of the files in /etc/{conf.d,init.d} or /etc/rc.conf has a
>> modification time in
28 марта 2011 г., 1:26:28, Alex Schuster пишет:
> Alexey Mishustin writes:
>> I performed the system update today (emerge -uND @world), and now I
>> get errors "One of the files in /etc/{conf.d,init.d} or /etc/rc.conf
>> has a modification time in the future!" at boot.
> [...]
>> I get
>> /etc/
> I did
> /etc/init.d/net-client restart
/etc/init.d/ntp-client restart
> , rebooted, and got nothing error.
--
Regards,
Alex
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 21:25:18 +0100, JM wrote:
> You can allow it to install the masked packages by typing:
>
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge --update --deep world
That will update every package to the latest ~x86 version, and cause them
all to downgrade again the next time you emerge world. As t
On Monday 28 March 2011 01:41:39 Alexey Mishustin wrote:
> 28 марта 2011 г., 1:22:27, Volker Armin Hemmann пишет:
> > On Monday 28 March 2011 01:14:05 Alexey Mishustin wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I performed the system update today (emerge -uND @world), and now I
> >> get
> >> errors "One of the
On 03/27/11 21:54, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 21:25:18 +0100, JM wrote:
You can allow it to install the masked packages by typing:
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge --update --deep world
That will update every package to the latest ~x86 version, and cause them
all to downgrade again
On 03/27/11 19:21, Roman Zilka wrote:
According to my local portage mirror, kipi-plugins-1.9.0 is currently
~x86. There's probably a stray line in
your /etc/portage/package.keywords which unmasks kipi-plugins-1.9.0.
The latest stable is kipi-plugins-1.2.0-r3 which is happy with
libkexiv2-4.4.5-r1
On Sunday 27 March 2011 18:50:36 CJoeB wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> See output below. I understand what this is telling me. However, the
> issue is if I unmask libkexiv2 and kipi-plugins, I get further messages
> about some other kde package that is masked by ~x86 keyword. And this
> goes on continuous
On 03/27/11 22:25, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sunday 27 March 2011 18:50:36 CJoeB wrote:
Hi All,
See output below. I understand what this is telling me. However, the
issue is if I unmask libkexiv2 and kipi-plugins, I get further messages
about some other kde package that is masked by ~x86 keywor
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:42 AM, CJoeB wrote:
> On 03/27/11 22:25, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>> On Sunday 27 March 2011 18:50:36 CJoeB wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> See output below. I understand what this is telling me. However, the
>>> issue is if I unmask libkexiv2 and kipi-plugins, I get fur
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 3:42 PM, CJoeB wrote:
> On 03/27/11 22:25, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>> On Sunday 27 March 2011 18:50:36 CJoeB wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> See output below. I understand what this is telling me. However, the
>>> issue is if I unmask libkexiv2 and kipi-plugins, I get furt
On 3/27/11 5:00 AM, Elaine C. Sharpe wrote:
> In linux.gentoo.user, James wrote:
>>
>> What I would really like is to be able to exchange encrypted mail
>> with any MS user
>
> What, you've never received an encrypted email from a windows user
> before? If you think about it, surely you have...
>
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:09:15 +, CJoeB wrote:
> >> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge --update --deep world
> > That will update every package to the latest ~x86 version, and cause
> > them all to downgrade again the next time you emerge world. As this
> > includes packages that are both critical
>
> > Understood and agreed. For OO I couldn't quite get up the interest to
> > start building from scratch though. Something like 450MB of things to
> > download and then what, do it again in a week or two? Not worth it for
> > my needs.
>
Did you delete the source out of your /usr/portage/distfi
42 matches
Mail list logo
