Am 27.12.2010 22:23, schrieb Remy Blank:
> Marc Blumentritt wrote:
>> Have a look at ownership an permissions of virtualbox!
>
> rsync sets the mtime and permissions of directories *after* recursing
> into them. So if you interrupted the process while it was copying the
> contents of virtualbox, t
Marc Blumentritt wrote:
> Ah, OK. Didn't know this. Do you know, why it does work like this?
It initially sets the permissions to 600 presumably to limit access to
an unfinished copy from other users.
The mtime must be set after copying the contents, because adding a file
or directory changes the
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 10:18:46 +0100, Remy Blank wrote:
> > Ah, OK. Didn't know this. Do you know, why it does work like this?
>
> It initially sets the permissions to 600 presumably to limit access to
> an unfinished copy from other users.
>
> The mtime must be set after copying the contents, b
On Monday 27 December 2010 11:37:29 Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> I want to do this:
> http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2010/11/forget-200-lines-red-hat-speed
> .html
>
> in userspace, but automate it at boot time. it requires that I create and
> mount the cgroup subsystem in sysfs and sounds a l
On Friday 24 December 2010 14:12:17 alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
> I use hal. No more xorg.conf.
> Since I updated kdm to v.4.4.5 it use a QWERTY keymap, when it worked OK in
> previous 4.4.* version after modifying
> /etc/hal/fdi/policy/10-x11-input.fdi. I try adding the following 2 lines
> als
Mike Edenfield writes:
> The tar method you're looking for is:
>
> tar -C /old cpf - | tar -C /new xvpf -
>
> You'll probably not want to do the entire / in a single go,
> since /proc, /sys, and /dev (at least) should be skipped.
> Copy /old/sbin -> /new/sbin, etc. for all of the root
> folders
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 00:02:31 -0500, Mike Edenfield wrote:
> tar -C /old cpf - | tar -C /new xvpf -
>
> You'll probably not want to do the entire / in a single go,
> since /proc, /sys, and /dev (at least) should be skipped.
Which can be done with the -l option.
--
Neil Bothwick
You can't te
After multiple fs corruptions and nothing untoward shown by smartctl (I think)
I decided to move to ext4.
Now when I boot I see a message about my / fs which says Opts: (null)
dmesg | grep -i EXT4
Command line: root=/dev/sda7 rootfstype=ext4
Kernel co
On 12/27/2010 03:52 PM, walt wrote:
> On 12/27/2010 06:03 AM, walt wrote:
>> ...
>> My new (post-hal) mouse config:
>>
>> Section "InputClass" <- note the new word "Class", not "Device"
>> Identifier "trackball" <- can be anything you want
>> MatchProduct "ImExPS" <-*new*. Matches the p
On Saturday 18 December 2010 14:40:07 Mick wrote:
> On 30 November 2010 11:11, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Monday 29 November 2010 18:20:56 Mick wrote:
> >> Will wait for 2.6.36 series to see if this old PIII will work.
> >
> > I'm running 2.6.36-r3 at the moment. You only have to add a keyword
On Friday 24 December 2010 15:12:17 alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
> I use hal. No more xorg.conf.
> Since I updated kdm to v.4.4.5 it use a QWERTY keymap, when it worked OK in
> previous 4.4.* version after modifying /etc/hal/fdi/policy/10-x11-input.fdi.
> I try adding the following 2 lines also
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 00:02:31 -0500, Mike Edenfield wrote:
>
> > tar -C /old cpf - | tar -C /new xvpf -
> >
> > You'll probably not want to do the entire / in a single go,
> > since /proc, /sys, and /dev (at least) should be skipped.
>
> Which can be done with the -l opti
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Mick wrote:
> What is the meaning of Opts: (null) ?
My guess is that it is showing the default mount options as stored in
the partition's superblock (set by tune2fs -o x). You can view the
current default mount options by using "tune2fs -l /dev/sda1" (or
whate
On Tuesday 28 December 2010 16:26:16 Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 00:02:31 -0500, Mike Edenfield wrote:
> > > tar -C /old cpf - | tar -C /new xvpf -
> > >
> > > You'll probably not want to do the entire / in a single go,
> > > since /proc, /sys, and /dev (
On 12/28/10 20:01:19, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> Getting the following error:
>
> [blocks B ] (" settings-256.52" is blocking x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-260.19.29)
>
> Total: 150 packages (148 upgrades, 1 new, 1 reinstall), Size of
> downloads:
> 87,737 kB
> Conflict: 2 blocks (1 unsatisfied)
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Daniel D Jones
wrote:
> Getting the following error:
>
> [blocks B ] settings-256.52" is blocking x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-260.19.29)
>
> Total: 150 packages (148 upgrades, 1 new, 1 reinstall), Size of downloads:
> 87,737 kB
> Conflict: 2 blocks (1 unsatisfi
On Tuesday 28 December 2010 17:23:22 Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Mick wrote:
> > What is the meaning of Opts: (null) ?
>
> My guess is that it is showing the default mount options as stored in
> the partition's superblock (set by tune2fs -o x). You can view the
> cu
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Daniel D Jones
> wrote:
>> Getting the following error:
>>
>> [blocks B ] > settings-256.52" is blocking x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-260.19.29)
It appears that 260.19.29 nvidia- drivers and nvidia-settings
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:26:16 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Which can be done with the -l option.
>
> You are mistaken: The -l option causes tar to warn if not all hars
> links to a file could not be resolved.
You are right. I was referring to the --one-file-system, which I thought
had -l a
Joerg Schilling writes:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 00:02:31 -0500, Mike Edenfield wrote:
> > > tar -C /old cpf - | tar -C /new xvpf -
> > >
> > > You'll probably not want to do the entire / in a single go,
> > > since /proc, /sys, and /dev (at least) should be skipped.
> >
>
On Tuesday 28 December 2010 22:33:53 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:26:16 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > Which can be done with the -l option.
> >
> > You are mistaken: The -l option causes tar to warn if not all hars
> > links to a file could not be resolved.
>
> You are righ
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:26:16 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > > Which can be done with the -l option.
> >
> > You are mistaken: The -l option causes tar to warn if not all hars
> > links to a file could not be resolved.
>
> You are right. I was referring to the --one-
Joerg Schilling writes:
> On Linux, there is frequently gtar installed as tar and gtar is not
> respecting standards. Gtar in previous times was e.g. in conflict with
> the standard regarding to -l. Aprox. 10 years ago, I files a bug report
> against gtar for this standard deviation and it seems t
> On Monday 27 December 2010 11:37:29 Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> > I want to do this:
> >
> http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2010/11/forget-200-lines-red-hat-speed
> > .html
> >
> > in userspace, but automate it at boot time. it requires that I create and
> > mount the cgroup subsystem in sysfs
On Monday 27 December 2010 19:37:29 Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> I want to do this:
> http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2010/11/forget-200-lines-red-hat-speed.
> html
>
> in userspace, but automate it at boot time. it requires that I create and
> mount the cgroup subsystem in sysfs and sounds a l
25 matches
Mail list logo
