Thank you for help.
Everything went smoothly.
To be on a save side I would like to unemerge old version of gcc with
--depclean switch. How can I revert my previous --noreplace operation
cleanly
besides emerge --unemerge =gcc-4.3.4.
Dnia 21-10-2010 o godz. 16:17 Paul Hartman napisał(a):
> 2010/1
Hi,
this is a bit off topic, since it primarily concerns a laptop running
OpenSuSe 11.3, but I do need your help and I known there are experts
here.
This old laptop has a
radeon RV350 (mobility Radeon 9600 M10) graphics card.
There is an xf86-video-ati driver installed.
Now, when booting wit
> Any caveats with openrc we should be aware of?
# genlop -l | grep openrc
Thu Apr 24 14:05:53 2008 >>> sys-apps/openrc-0.2.2
I've been running baselayout2/openrc oder 2.5 years now without any
problems. Of course this does not mean it will run smoothly on your
gentoo box.
As I recall upgra
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:14 on Friday 22 October 2010, Maciej Grela
did opine thusly:
> 2010/10/21 Alan McKinnon :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > One gentoo notebook running wicd, three general classes of network logon
> > used frequently (dhpc always):
> >
> > work - mostly wired, occasionally
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:13:16 +0200
Michael Hampicke wrote:
> > Any caveats with openrc we should be aware of?
>
> # genlop -l | grep openrc
> Thu Apr 24 14:05:53 2008 >>> sys-apps/openrc-0.2.2
>
> I've been running baselayout2/openrc oder 2.5 years now without any
> problems. Of course this
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:18:38 -0400, David Relson wrote:
> > As I recall upgrading to b2/openrc involves lots of changed config
> > files (mostly conf.d init init.d), so you have to be a little
> > careful.
>
> My recollection was of
>
> (1) being scared that I'd get the changes wrong for basel
Neil Bothwick writes:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:06:25 +0300, Timur Aydin wrote:
>
>> I am using the ~x86 (testing) version of gentoo linux. After recent
>> updates, my X windows became extremely sluggish and I found out that the
>> problem is related to a new version of mesa (7.8.2 specifically).
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Helmut Jarausch
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is a bit off topic, since it primarily concerns a laptop running
> OpenSuSe 11.3, but I do need your help and I known there are experts
> here.
>
> This old laptop has a
> radeon RV350 (mobility Radeon 9600 M10) graphics card.
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 5:13 AM, Michael Hampicke wrote:
>> Any caveats with openrc we should be aware of?
>
> # genlop -l | grep openrc
> Thu Apr 24 14:05:53 2008 >>> sys-apps/openrc-0.2.2
>
> I've been running baselayout2/openrc oder 2.5 years now without any
> problems. Of course this does
On 22 Oct 2010, at 12:29, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> ... Openrc will be stabilised at some time,
> so you may as well do the upgrade when you feel like it rather that when
> the devs decide to flip a keyword.
I thought this was a matter of debate - Openrc was IIRC the creation of Roy
Marples, who wa
>> I just upgraded from gcc-4.4.3-r2 to gcc-4.4.4-r2 and I'm wondering if
>> I really need to rebuild everything as it says in the guide:
>>
>> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml
>
> No, you do not need to do this. The document is over-reaching (see below)
>
> I ran a mixture of 4.4.3 a
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes:
> I have a similar recollection. Openrc will be stabilised at some time,
> so you may as well do the upgrade when you feel like it rather that when
> the devs decide to flip a keyword.
OK, thanks to all for the input. Yea
the thread is 2 years old, but, sti
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:19:51 +0100, Stroller wrote:
> > ... Openrc will be stabilised at some time,
> > so you may as well do the upgrade when you feel like it rather that
> > when the devs decide to flip a keyword.
>
> I thought this was a matter of debate - Openrc was IIRC the creation of
> R
Am 22.10.2010 17:06, schrieb Paul Hartman:
> Same here, no problems since day 1 in fully ~amd64 Gentoo system.
Same here (just for the records).
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:19 on Friday 22 October 2010, Stroller did
opine thusly:
> On 22 Oct 2010, at 12:29, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > ... Openrc will be stabilised at some time,
> > so you may as well do the upgrade when you feel like it rather that when
> > the devs decide to flip a k
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 08:54:25PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:19:51 +0100, Stroller wrote:
>
> > > ... Openrc will be stabilised at some time,
> > > so you may as well do the upgrade when you feel like it rather that
> > > when the devs decide to flip a keyword.
> >
>
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:11 on Friday 22 October 2010, Allan
Gottlieb did opine thusly:
[snip]
> > package.mask is the right place, but you should add the specific version.
> > Then the system will only upgrade when a newer (hopefully fixed) version
> > arrives.
> >
> > =media-libs/me
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:19 on Friday 22 October 2010, Stroller did
opine thusly:
On 22 Oct 2010, at 12:29, Neil Bothwick wrote:
... Openrc will be stabilised at some time,
so you may as well do the upgrade when you feel like it rather that when
the dev
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:37 on Friday 22 October 2010, Zeerak
Mustafa Waseem did opine thusly:
> > > I understood the future of Openrc within Gentoo to be in question:
> > > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_ce55de133ca592b638db758c9e457
> > > 370.xml
> >
> >
> >
> > An interes
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:52 on Friday 22 October 2010, Dale did
opine thusly:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 18:19 on Friday 22 October 2010, Stroller
> > did
> >
> > opine thusly:
> >> On 22 Oct 2010, at 12:29, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >>> ... Openrc will be
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:59:18PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 22:37 on Friday 22 October 2010, Zeerak
> Mustafa Waseem did opine thusly:
>
> > > > I understood the future of Openrc within Gentoo to be in question:
> > > > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/ms
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:52:18 -0500, Dale wrote:
> That was what I recalled about the openrc discussion too. It is coming
> but just not sure when. Me, I'm not switching until it starts getting
> closer to that time. It, like some of the newer versions of portage,
> appears to be stable and i
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:52:18 -0500, Dale wrote:
That was what I recalled about the openrc discussion too. It is coming
but just not sure when. Me, I'm not switching until it starts getting
closer to that time. It, like some of the newer versions of portage,
appears t
On 22 Oct 2010, at 21:32, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> ...
> Did you and I read the same mail thread? I read all of it - did you?
Apparently you have poorer reading comprehension that I do:
>> That Gentoo-dev thread was 3 or 4 months ago, and I haven't read all of it
>> today.
I would stand by my adv
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:50 on Friday 22 October 2010, Zeerak
Mustafa Waseem did opine thusly:
> > It's openrc-${PV}+1 - there's no question about that.
> >
> >
> >
> > Until someone actually ponies up and commits something other than openrc
> > to the tree, it's gonna stay on openrc.
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:13 on Saturday 23 October 2010, Neil
Bothwick did opine thusly:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:52:18 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > That was what I recalled about the openrc discussion too. It is coming
> > but just not sure when. Me, I'm not switching until it starts getti
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:26 on Saturday 23 October 2010, Dale did
opine thusly:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:52:18 -0500, Dale wrote:
> >> That was what I recalled about the openrc discussion too. It is coming
> >> but just not sure when. Me, I'm not switching unt
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:43 on Saturday 23 October 2010, Stroller
did opine thusly:
> On 22 Oct 2010, at 21:32, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > ...
> > Did you and I read the same mail thread? I read all of it - did you?
>
> Apparently you have poorer reading comprehension that I do:
> >> Tha
Alan McKinnon writes:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 16:11 on Friday 22 October 2010, Allan
> Gottlieb did opine thusly:
>
> [snip]
>
>> Perhaps I should be downgrading xorg-server as well.
>
> Masking mesa-7.8.2 means (per the ebuilds) you will have to drop back to
> xorg-server-1.7.7-r1. B
29 matches
Mail list logo
