On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:33:39 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Hi all. During a system update today, /usr/lib/libdbus-1.la was
> deleted. However a number of packages require this file
emerge lafilefixer
lafilefixer --justfixit
--
Neil Bothwick
Znqr lbh ybbx!
signature.asc
Description
Hi!
>I'm thinking I will change Amarok to Audacious.
Maybe you should have a look at aTunes, rhythmbox, exaile,
gmusicbrowser and jajuk too... :)
>Anybody else experienced this or just I'm cursed? :)
I had a lot of stability problems with amarok on opensuse. IMHO it's
not worth the hassle, go w
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:33:39 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>
> > Hi all. During a system update today, /usr/lib/libdbus-1.la was
> > deleted. However a number of packages require this file
>
> emerge lafilefixer
> lafilefixer --justfixit
Worked fine, I had lafilef
On 09/20/2010 09:02 AM, András Csányi wrote:
Hi Guys,
I like amarok, I don't know why just I like it. Yesterday, when I
switched off amarok I saw the CPU using went down from ~40% to ~3% and
kwin from ~30% to ~1%.
the side effects of this, slower desktop and sometimes is
uncomfortable. My machin
On Monday 20 September 2010 11:32:57 am András Csányi wrote:
> I like amarok, I don't know why just I like it. Yesterday, when I
> switched off amarok I saw the CPU using went down from ~40% to ~3% and
> kwin from ~30% to ~1%.
I use amarok all the time, although its not lite, its cpu usage is norm
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 06:12:56 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > > Hi all. During a system update today, /usr/lib/libdbus-1.la was
> > > deleted. However a number of packages require this file
> >
> > emerge lafilefixer
> > lafilefixer --justfixit
> Worked fine, I had lafilefixer, but h
I am finding that when I try to emerge xulrunner on the recent update I
get the following:
XRemoteClient_standalone.o: In function
`XRemoteClient::FindBestWindow(char const*, char const*, char const*,
int)':
/var/tmp/portage/net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.2.9-r1/work/mozilla-1.9.2/widget/src/xremoteclient/
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> This is of interest to those of us running old versions of Flash,
> especially on 64-bit installs without 32-bit support (looks in
> mirror).
Hi, this Flash 10.2-pre is in portage since 2 days ago. You'll just
have to unmask it. :)
www-plugi
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less stable.
I haven't had any crashing or failing to start, but Firefox in Linux
has always been pretty bad in general for me. Slow UI, unusable in NX
(constant screen redraws;
Hi all , I just downloaded the VMware Workstation 7 and tried to
install it on my gentoo but failed
I installed 32-bit gentoo system on my PC and its kernel version is
the lastest one in gentoo -> 2.6.35-r7
I successfully installed Workstation on the gentoo but when I run it ,
it ask me to compile
On Monday 20 September 2010, András Csányi wrote:
>
> I'm thinking I will change Amarok to Audacious.
>
> Anybody else experienced this or just I'm cursed? :)
cursed.
Also, if you want something 'light':
qmmp
alsaplayer
On 09/20/2010 06:54 PM, Thomas Yao wrote:
Hi all , I just downloaded the VMware Workstation 7 and tried to
install it on my gentoo but failed
I installed 32-bit gentoo system on my PC and its kernel version is
the lastest one in gentoo -> 2.6.35-r7
I successfully installed Workstation on the gen
On 09/20/2010 06:20 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
This is of interest to those of us running old versions of Flash,
especially on 64-bit installs without 32-bit support (looks in
mirror).
Hi, this Flash 10.2-pre is in portage since 2 days ago. Y
Hi,
I installed KDE 4.5.1 over the weekend following the
"remove-all-old-kde-packages-first" approach on the gentoo webpage. So
far everything seems to be fine except one thing.
When I type "su -" in konsole it takes 20-30 seconds to complete.
Doing the same on a text console the command complete
On Sunday 19 September 2010 14:11:55 you wrote:
> I have tried changing resources in systemsettings to akonadi directory,
> instead of .kde4/share/apps/kabc/std.vcf, but still cannot see any
> contacts.
>
> When entering an address in a new message To: field, the address book seems
> to be used be
On Monday 20 September 2010 11:38:15 pm Thomas Drueke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed KDE 4.5.1 over the weekend following the
> "remove-all-old-kde-packages-first" approach on the gentoo webpage. So
> far everything seems to be fine except one thing.
>
> When I type "su -" in konsole it takes 20-30
> Also, if you want something 'light':
> qmmp
> alsaplayer
There's also media-sound/clementine
Apparently, though unproven, at 20:08 on Monday 20 September 2010, Thomas
Drueke did opine thusly:
> Hi,
>
> I installed KDE 4.5.1 over the weekend following the
> "remove-all-old-kde-packages-first" approach on the gentoo webpage. So
> far everything seems to be fine except one thing.
>
> When
Thanks for hints, but no luck so far.
Yohan, using xterm instead of konsole results in the same delay.
Alan, hosts contains the hostname (FQDN) for eth0 and also alocalhost
entry. Plus wireshark didn't show any network traffic during the delay
(for both eth0 and lo).
Is there any of the new serv
On 09/19/10 20:02, András Csányi wrote:
On 19 September 2010 10:09, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:28 on Sunday 19 September 2010, András
Csányi did opine thusly:
On 19 September 2010 00:14, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every rele
Article: Google Warns of China Exit Over Hacking
Link: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126333757451026659.html
I don't think it is that easy to hack if you are using SSL connections
and very strong passwords. How long would it take supercomputers to
perform a brute force attack if you are using
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> You cannot install the package provided by vmware.com. You have to use the
> Gentoo ebuild. With layman, add the "vmware" overlay and install
> vmware-workstation from there. Before you do that, make sure you cleaned
> your system fro
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Beau Henderson wrote:
> I had this same problem and decided I had bad RAM. Before I could order
> any, I rebuild my system and it happens that I did so with an image that had
> GCC 4.3* rather than 4.4. Funny enough, firefox worked just fine. I did some
> searchin
On 09/21/10 12:41, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Beau Henderson mailto:b...@thehenderson.com>> wrote:
I had this same problem and decided I had bad RAM. Before I could order
any, I rebuild my system
and it happens that I did so with an image that had GCC 4.3* ra
On 21 September 2010 00:23, Beau Henderson wrote:
> On 09/19/10 20:02, András Csányi wrote:
>>
>> On 19 September 2010 10:09, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>>
>>> Apparently, though unproven, at 00:28 on Sunday 19 September 2010, András
>>> Csányi did opine thusly:
>>>
On 19 September 2010 00:14, Ke
On 16/09/10 21:30, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thursday 16 September 2010 12:01:43 Jake Moe wrote:
>> On 09/16/10 16:22, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>> On Thursday 16 September 2010 00:34:39 Jake Moe wrote:
On 16/09/10 08:26, Dale wrote:
> Jake Moe wrote:
>> Thanks for that, I'll rebuild the
Im using the vmware installer on gentoo sucessfully. Seems that 7.1.1
on 2.6.34 is a bit smoother on the install than .35 but it still
works.
Iirc you just need to set init script stuff
>
> You cannot install the package provided by vmware.com. You have to use the
> Gentoo ebuild. With layman
On 09/19/10 18:08, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> Firefox 4 indeed is smoother (probably due to the new animations,
>> probably because none of the plugins I used are compatible yet, but
>> maybe it is just faster); but it is definitely more memory hungrier than
>> before. In Fx3, it usually took around ~
On 09/19/10 19:04, Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> Apparently, though unproven, at 07:45 on Sunday 19 September 2010, Lie
>> Ryan
>> did opine thusly:
>>
>>
>>> On 09/19/10 09:22, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
>>>
On 18 September 2010 15:14, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> Is it
29 matches
Mail list logo
