On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 06:52:35AM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> is there an option to revdep-rebuild to only do output if it has
> something to rebuild ? This should be run via cron to notify me
> via email.
Usually "is there an option..." questions are well-answered by "man
". And in this case
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 20:02:23 -0500, Dale wrote:
> >> assuming this all goes without trouble (will take a while), should I
> >> unmerge version 4.3.4?
> >
> > There's no reason to. Unless you don't need it anymore.
> >
>
> Or he doesn't like cruft or needs the drive space.
>
> Is rebuilding
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:51:30 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> is there an emerge option for building just a single package w/o
> its dependencies (if deps are required, it should fail) ?
Yes, and it is clearly documented in the emerge man page, along with
several other useful options.
--
Neil B
On Saturday 10 July 2010 02:57:42 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 07/10/2010 04:16 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just updated the portage tree and gcc was upgraded. I have set gcc to
> > the newer version
> >
> > -> gcc-config -l
> >
> > [1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.3.4
> > [2]
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 05:11:49AM -0400, Willie Wong wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 06:52:35AM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > is there an option to revdep-rebuild to only do output if it has
> > something to rebuild ? This should be run via cron to notify me
> > via email.
>
> Usually "is th
on 2010-07-06 at 13:14 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>The football competition where england, france and italy all got their
>asses handed to them recently :-)
not to mention argentina and brazil... did you notice the tiny uy in my
e-mail address? :-) :-)
(it's a real pity i don't give a sh*t about foot
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Unless he's the kind of guy who likes to rip his Ferrari apart for kicks and
> put it all back together again so that not even the factory can notice...
Precisely... :-)
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>
>> Unless he's the kind of guy who likes to rip his Ferrari apart for kicks and
>> put it all back together again so that not even the factory can notice...
>
> Precisely... :-)
>
Oh
On 7/9/10, Matthias Fechner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried the last days to do a
> emerge -avuDN world
>
> but it fails at the package
> kde-base/superkaramba-4.4.4
>
> I get the error message:
> Linking CXX shared library ../../lib/libsuperkaramba.so
> CMakeFiles/superkaramba.dir/python/meter.o: In fun
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:52:35 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> is there an option to revdep-rebuild to only do output if it has
> something to rebuild ? This should be run via cron to notify me
> via email.
There is the --quiet option, but this doesn't remove everything. You
could try redirecting
revdep-rebuild -pv
2010/7/10 Neil Bothwick
> On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:52:35 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>
> > is there an option to revdep-rebuild to only do output if it has
> > something to rebuild ? This should be run via cron to notify me
> > via email.
>
> There is the --quiet option, but th
* Dale wrote:
> Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> >Hi folks,
> >
> >
> >is there an emerge option for building just a single package w/o
> >its dependencies (if deps are required, it should fail) ?
> >
> >I'd like to set up an automatic update for certain packages,
> >but w/o touching all the rest not expli
* Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:52:35 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>
> > is there an option to revdep-rebuild to only do output if it has
> > something to rebuild ? This should be run via cron to notify me
> > via email.
>
> There is the --quiet option, but this doesn't remove
* Mark Knecht wrote:
> Oh, and besides liking the smell of fresh baked 1 and 0's in the
> morning emerge -e @world was an easy way to solve my libpng problem.
> Woke up this morning to a freshly baked Gentoo machine.
Now we just need support for emerging fresh and hot coffee ;-)
BTW: regularil
(I asked this on IRC more than an hour ago, got no reply, so here goes
it to the list.)
What's the policy when you think that a change made due to a FIXED bug
needs more changes? Should you just comment it, fill another bug or
change the state (I can't do the later, anyway)?
As an example (the on
On Saturday 10 July 2010 19:21:28 Nuno J. Silva wrote:
> (I asked this on IRC more than an hour ago, got no reply, so here goes
> it to the list.)
>
> What's the policy when you think that a change made due to a FIXED bug
> needs more changes? Should you just comment it, fill another bug or
> chan
On 07/08/2010 07:28 AM, Mick wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I updated sys-fs/udev-149 yesterday and noticed some uevent errors
> during boot today. They went by too fast for me to catch them, but
> they said something about udevent: unable to access device/000/000
> . mouse and another about event9.
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
