On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 06:03:51 +, Mick wrote:
> Thanks I used reiser4progs to check and repair the fs. The weird
> thing is that I had to repeat this on the /var partition, after I
> zero'ed it, reformatted it and reinstalled gentoo on it. O_O
>
> How is it possible that the same directory/fi
On 06/09/2010 02:14 AM, Matthias Fechner wrote:
> Hi Mick,
>
> Am 09.06.10 08:05, schrieb Mick:
>> I can't answer directly your question, but unless you have a
>> particular reason to use Joomla, I would strongly recommend to give
>> Drupal a try. It is a more powerful CMS with more modules than
Hi all,
After upgrading world, i installed python-3.1.2-r3 with already
installed python-2.6.4-r1
As recommended, i ran python-updater ; so python-updater added some
packages to the list as :
app-office/openoffice-bin:0
dev-lang/-MERGING-python:2.5
...
The output is an error about dev-lang/-MERG
On 06/09/2010 03:32 AM, Jacques Montier wrote:
Hi all,
After upgrading world, i installed python-3.1.2-r3 with already
installed python-2.6.4-r1
As recommended, i ran python-updater ; so python-updater added some
packages to the list as :
app-office/openoffice-bin:0
dev-lang/-MERGING-python:2.5
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:32:05 +0200, Jacques Montier wrote:
> The output is an error about dev-lang/-MERGING-python:2.5 as invalid
> atom ! Where does that "-MERGING-" come from ?
It's an orphaned file left in /var/db/pkg by an aborted emerge attempt.
Delete it and try again.
signature.asc
Desc
Le 09/06/2010 15:17, walt a gentiment tapote:
> On 06/09/2010 03:32 AM, Jacques Montier wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After upgrading world, i installed python-3.1.2-r3 with already
>> installed python-2.6.4-r1
>> As recommended, i ran python-updater ; so python-updater added some
>> packages to the list
Jacques Montier wrote:
Le 09/06/2010 15:17, walt a gentiment tapote:
On 06/09/2010 03:32 AM, Jacques Montier wrote:
Hi all,
After upgrading world, i installed python-3.1.2-r3 with already
installed python-2.6.4-r1
As recommended, i ran python-updater ; so python-updater added some
pa
--
Jacques
Site : http://sites.google.com/site/jacquesfr35/
Le 09/06/2010 16:26, Dale a gentiment tapote:
> Jacques Montier wrote:
>> Le 09/06/2010 15:17, walt a gentiment tapote:
>>
>>> On 06/09/2010 03:32 AM, Jacques Montier wrote:
>>>
Hi all,
After upgrading world, i
Le 09/06/2010 15:33, Neil Bothwick a gentiment tapote:
> On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:32:05 +0200, Jacques Montier wrote:
>
>
>> The output is an error about dev-lang/-MERGING-python:2.5 as invalid
>> atom ! Where does that "-MERGING-" come from ?
>>
> It's an orphaned file left in /var/db/pkg b
Jacques Montier wrote:
--
Jacques
Site : http://sites.google.com/site/jacquesfr35/
Le 09/06/2010 16:26, Dale a gentiment tapote:
Jacques Montier wrote:
Le 09/06/2010 15:17, walt a gentiment tapote:
On 06/09/2010 03:32 AM, Jacques Montier wrote:
Hi all,
After
On 2010-06-09 11:08 AM, Dale wrote:
> If I recall correctly, there are a few programs that can run with
> python 3. Thing is, there are still a LOT of them that can't run with
> it and must have python 2. If you switch to python 3, you will have a
> mess on your hands. If nothing actually requires
Helmut Jarausch [10-06-09 17:14]:
> On 8 Jun, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using k3b to burn dvds/cds.
> > As most programs of this kind, k3b can /copy/ but not
> > /move/ data to a DVD.
> > Therefore, when trying to find tose files, which exactly
> > sum up to the size
Tanstaafl writes:
> So... for those of use who have already installed it (and thankfully I
> did actually read the notes about not switching to it), should me
> uninstall it then mask it? Or just leave it alone?
For the sake of simplicity, I just leave it alone.
> I'm guessing it
> won't hurt an
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 18:21:17 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
> > So... for those of use who have already installed it (and thankfully I
> > did actually read the notes about not switching to it), should me
> > uninstall it then mask it? Or just leave it alone?
>
> For the sake of simplicity, I just
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 17:49:13 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> sounds interesting, but seems the task to find the
> files afterwards for deletion remains.
> A "move" into a "container" would much more simpler
> and straight forward.
ISTR mkisofs has an option to report the size of the filesyste
On 2010-06-09 12:28 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 18:21:17 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
>>> I'm guessing it won't hurt anything, again as long as I don't
>>> stupidly switch to it?
>> Right.
> And if a script specifically wants Python 3, it is there for it to
> use.
Cool, thanks g
Am 09.06.2010 12:32, schrieb Jacques Montier:
> Hi all,
Hi,
> dev-lang/-MERGING-python:2.5
I get this also sometimes when I have a emerge running and use
python-updater at the same time.
Then waiting for the emerge to stop normaly helps.
Greetings
Sebastian
Am 08.06.2010 19:26, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
> On the other hand: A iso-image-file on the harddisk would
> be nice, but that filesystem isn't made for moving files
> back and forth...
You could use udf both for the image-file and the dvd.
Greetings
Sebastian
Hi,
there is a new qt and kde available, but it still has the annoying USE flag
qt3support... is there a way to get rid of it? a lot of kde packages are
complaining about qt3support and I don't want it.
qt3 left my system a couple of years ago!
so this is starting to get really annoying 8-(
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Rudmer van Dijk
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is a new qt and kde available, but it still has the annoying USE flag
> qt3support... is there a way to get rid of it? a lot of kde packages are
> complaining about qt3support and I don't want it.
>
> qt3 left my system a coupl
I wanted to see which packages depend on x11-libs/qt-webkit, so I did:
equery depends x11-libs/qt-webkit
I got lots of results; but almost none of them mention qt-webkit
*anywhere* (except for one package: qtscriptgenerator).
I don't understand. Why does it print all the rest? Anyone can
On 06/09/2010 11:27 PM, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
Hi,
there is a new qt and kde available, but it still has the annoying USE flag
qt3support... is there a way to get rid of it? a lot of kde packages are
complaining about qt3support and I don't want it.
qt3 left my system a couple of years ago!
so
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:52:55 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> I wanted to see which packages depend on x11-libs/qt-webkit, so I did:
>
>equery depends x11-libs/qt-webkit
>
> I got lots of results; but almost none of them mention qt-webkit
> *anywhere* (except for one package: qtscriptgener
On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 06/09/2010 11:27 PM, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > there is a new qt and kde available, but it still has the annoying USE
> > flag qt3support... is there a way to get rid of it? a lot of kde
> > packages are complaining about qt3sup
On 06/10/2010 01:17 AM, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/09/2010 11:27 PM, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
Hi,
there is a new qt and kde available, but it still has the annoying USE
flag qt3support... is there a way to get rid of it? a lot of kde
packages
On 06/10/2010 01:14 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
emerge --depclean -pv x11-libs/qt-webkit
Thanks for the tip! Didn't know --depclean can be used for that.
Compared to that:
x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.6.3 pulled in by:
app-cdr/k3b--r1
app-text/kchmviewer-5.2
dev-python/PyQt4-4.7.3
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 06/10/2010 01:14 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>
>> emerge --depclean -pv x11-libs/qt-webkit
>
> Thanks for the tip! Didn't know --depclean can be used for that. Compared
> to that:
>
> x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.6.3 pulled in by:
>app-cdr/
On 06/10/2010 01:59 AM, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/10/2010 01:14 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
emerge --depclean -pv x11-libs/qt-webkit
Thanks for the tip! Didn't know --depclean can be used for that. Compared
to that:
x11-libs/qt-webki
I'm converting an older Dell E521 AMD K8 machine from XP to Gentoo. I
intend to use it with an HDHomerun ATSC tuner, for recording and
playback. I don't know if it supports AGP, but I am including...
<*> AMD Opteron/Athlon64 on-CPU GART support
<*> NVIDIA nForce/nForce2 chipset support
...i
Am Wed, 9 Jun 2010 17:59:08 -0500
schrieb Paul Hartman :
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > On 06/10/2010 01:14 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
[...]
>
> I have the exact same kind of results as you, and have no idea why.
> I'm using portage-2.2_rc67, maybe if I were using s
eix gcc shows:
Installed versions:
4.3.4(4.3)!s(10:56:18 AM 02/27/2010)(gtk mudflap nls nptl openmp -altivec -
bootstrap -build -doc -fixed-point -fortran -gcj -hardened -libffi -multilib -
multislot -n32 -n64 -nocxx -nopie -objc -objc++ -objc-gc -test -vanilla)
4.4.3-r2(4.4)!s(08:29:19 PM
Walter Dnes writes:
> I'm converting an older Dell E521 AMD K8 machine from XP to Gentoo.
> I intend to use it with an HDHomerun ATSC tuner, for recording and
> playback. I don't know if it supports AGP, but I am including... <*>
> AMD Opteron/Athlon64 on-CPU GART support
> <*> NVIDIA nFor
I usually keep the last version of GCC around until I've managed to rebuild the entire world with
the newer one, just in case. If you've run the tasks mentioned after the newer version was
installed, it should probably be safe.
On 06/10/10 10:34, Daniel D Jones wrote:
eix gcc shows:
Instal
Daniel D Jones writes:
> eix gcc shows:
>
> Installed versions:
>
> 4.3.4(4.3)!s(10:56:18 AM 02/27/2010)(gtk mudflap nls nptl openmp
> -altivec - bootstrap -build -doc -fixed-point -fortran -gcj -hardened
> -libffi -multilib - multislot -n32 -n64 -nocxx -nopie -objc -objc++
> -objc-gc -test -va
Did you run "fix_libtool_files.sh 4.3.4" after switching gcc versions
with gcc-config before trying depclean?
BillK
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 03:05 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Daniel D Jones writes:
>
> > eix gcc shows:
> >
> > Installed versions:
> >
> > 4.3.4(4.3)!s(10:56:18 AM 02/27/2010)(
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-06-09 12:28 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 18:21:17 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
I'm guessing it won't hurt anything, again as long as I don't
stupidly switch to it?
Right.
And if a script specifically wants Python 3, it
36 matches
Mail list logo
