Am 17.05.2010 08:56, schrieb KH:
On Wed, 05 May 2010 23:20:01 +0200, Matt Harrison wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] samba vs. cifs:
>On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 06:42:09PM +0200, KH wrote:
[snip]
>> specific (don't want to hear "moo"): Will I be able to mount a samba
>> partition without setting th
One other thing:
# hal-device|grep -C 10 \,ru
net.linux.ifindex = 1 (0x1) (int)
23: udi =
'/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/platform_i8042_i8042_KBD_port_logicaldev_input'
linux.hotplug_type = 2 (0x2) (int)
linux.subsystem = 'input' (string)
input.device = '/dev/input/event2' (string
On Mon, 17 May 2010 11:21:50 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> Well, it turns out I have the distfiles mounted with --bind to my
> ftp/pub directory. And looking in the rsync man page:
Why not set $DISTDIR to the true location of distfiles instead of using
bind mounts?
--
Neil Bothwick
Tribble m
Am 16.05.2010 14:36, schrieb Jan Engelhardt:
> [Replying to
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/229533/focus=229542
> ]
>
> In my personal opinion, both the quality of shell commands and key
> generation is suboptimal. What makes it bad is that people follow
> it.
>
> First, it
On Mon, 17 May 2010 10:10:02 +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] [SOLVED] identical drives, different free space!:
>On Mon, 17 May 2010 11:21:50 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
>
>> Well, it turns out I have the distfiles mounted with --bind to my
>> ftp/pub directory. And looking in t
On Mon, 17 May 2010 12:31:17 +0100, David W Noon wrote:
> >> Well, it turns out I have the distfiles mounted with --bind to my
> >> ftp/pub directory. And looking in the rsync man page:
> >
> >Why not set $DISTDIR to the true location of distfiles instead of using
> >bind mounts?
>
> Because
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 09:07 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 17 May 2010 11:21:50 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
>
> > Well, it turns out I have the distfiles mounted with --bind to my
> > ftp/pub directory. And looking in the rsync man page:
>
> Why not set $DISTDIR to the true location of di
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 12:39 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 17 May 2010 12:31:17 +0100, David W Noon wrote:
...
> So the distfiles are actually in /usr/portage/distfiles?
for me yes, it looks the same for David.
> I share my distfiles but I don't use FTP as that means storing copies of
>
On Mon, 17 May 2010 21:50:28 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > I share my distfiles but I don't use FTP as that means storing copies
> > of the same file on each computer. Instead, I use NFS. /mnt/portage is
> > shared across all machines on the network and DISTDIR is set
> > to /mnt/portage/distfil
On 05/17/10 09:42, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote:
Well, I'm less inclined to think now that X is responsible for the
high CPU load. I wasn't too knowledgeable about the relationships
between X and its clients when I made my initial assumption. It was
more like "I startx + I move mouse + CPU shoots-up
On Mon, 17 May 2010 13:50:02 +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] [SOLVED] identical drives, different free space!:
>On Mon, 17 May 2010 12:31:17 +0100, David W Noon wrote:
>
>> >> Well, it turns out I have the distfiles mounted with --bind to my
>> >> ftp/pub directory. And looking
On 05/17/2010 11:14 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 16.05.2010 14:36, schrieb Jan Engelhardt:
>> [Replying to
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/229533/focus=229542
>> ]
>>
>> In my personal opinion, both the quality of shell commands and key
>> generation is suboptimal. Wha
On Mon, 17 May 2010 19:33:18 +0100, David W Noon wrote:
> >I share my distfiles but I don't use FTP as that means storing copies
> >of the same file on each computer. Instead, I use NFS. /mnt/portage is
> >shared across all machines on the network and DISTDIR is set
> >to /mnt/portage/distfiles in
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 21:53 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 17 May 2010 19:33:18 +0100, David W Noon wrote:
>
> > >I share my distfiles but I don't use FTP as that means storing copies
> > >of the same file on each computer. Instead, I use NFS. /mnt/portage is
> > >shared across all machines
14 matches
Mail list logo
