On 6 May, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
>Does anyone possibly know of any tools in Open Source for exploring
> DSP filter design? Something that might allow me to write equations,
> stimulate the filter, see the results in a GUI?
>
Have a look at Scilab and Xcos (www.scilab.org)
Helmut.
--
Hel
Hi,
I have the following file as /etc/logrotate.d/denyhosts
/var/log/denyhosts {
missingok
notifempty
create 0640 root root
sharedscripts
prerotate
/etc/init.d/denyhosts stop
endscript
postrotate
/etc/init.d/den
On Sun, 09 May 2010 18:11:06 -0700, walt wrote:
> This worked very well for a few months, and then those suggestions
> suddenly stopped coming.
>
> Since then, emerge @preserved-rebuild (or @preserved-libs) says this:
>
> #emerge @preserved-rebuild
> !!! '@preserved-rebuild' is not a valid packa
On Monday 10 May 2010 09:46:11 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
> I have the following file as /etc/logrotate.d/denyhosts
> /var/log/denyhosts {
> missingok
> notifempty
> create 0640 root root
> sharedscripts
> prerotate
> /etc/init.d/denyhosts stop
>
On 10 May, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Monday 10 May 2010 09:46:11 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have the following file as /etc/logrotate.d/denyhosts
>> /var/log/denyhosts {
>> missingok
>> notifempty
>> create 0640 root root
>> sharedscripts
>> prerotate
>>
On Monday 10 May 2010 11:40:29 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 10 May, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Monday 10 May 2010 09:46:11 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I have the following file as /etc/logrotate.d/denyhosts
> >> /var/log/denyhosts {
> >>
> >>missingok
> >>notifempty
> >>create
2010/5/10 Alan McKinnon :
> Please hash out all the lines in the denyhosts rotate file and run
> "logrotate -d /etc/logrotate.conf"
> Then let's see what error comes up.
>
> --
> alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
>
>
I hit the same problem few days ago but I didn't look for a solution
until today
"Walter Dnes" writes:
> On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 11:49:01AM -0230, Roger Mason wrote
>
>> Egg on face. The processor is listed in the bios as Intel EM64T.
>>
>> Does that mean I should re-build this as an amd64 system?
>
> No, it's not necessary. 64-bit Intel and AMD cpus will run 32-bit
> mo
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 07:39:01PM -0300, Crístian Viana wrote:
> what exactly is this reserved block count? is it about the number of inodes?
> does that mean that, by default, regular users can only use 95% of the
> inodes? and why did I use all these inodes? I don't think I have that many
> smal
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 9:16 AM, claude angéloz
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I installed a gentoo on a very recent system (efi support) . AT the
> reception of the laptop it was a disk label msdos, with a boot
> partition w** installer ... I changed that against a GPt disk label. I
> can install without
On 05/07/2010 11:14 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 07.05.2010 16:24, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>> Am 07.05.2010 10:53, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>>
>>> I think I am gonna file a bug for this now.
>>
>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=318865
>
> Aside from the potential bug:
On Sonntag 09 Mai 2010, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
> On Sunday 09 May 2010, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Sonntag 09 Mai 2010, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
> > > On Sunday 09 May 2010, walt wrote:
> > > > This looks to me like a major portage screwup. I see that on my
> > > > ~amd64 machine I have both
hi, all, i had write a #!/sbin/runscript script, but status will not turn to
"started", is there some error in this script or this is a bug?
THX all of you.
source code first (i want to start a bash script with runscript):
+
Saw the news announcement that gnome 2.28 is stabilized - however
looking at the header of gnome-base/gnome-2.28.2 (only 2.28 ebuild
present) still shows ~x86 - do I have update problems or are there
delays?
Is this for amd64 only or has x86 just been overlooked?
BillK
KEYWORDS="amd64 ~x86"
tro
thanks! I'll set it to 0% then.
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Willie Wong wrote:
> On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 07:39:01PM -0300, Crístian Viana wrote:
> > what exactly is this reserved block count? is it about the number of
> inodes?
> > does that mean that, by default, regular users can only use
I nmap'ed one of my remote Gentoo servers today and besides the
expected open ports were these:
1080/tcp open socks
3128/tcp open squid-http
8080/tcp open http-proxy
I'm not running any sort of proxy software that I know of and I should
be the only person whatsoever with access to the machine.
About a week ago, my Gentoo box was in a bad state where there were some
packages that would not install, so I was carefully emerging what I could
and filed a bug about one in particular that I could not emerge.
Then I got a new kernel, 2.6.32-gentoo-r7, and I booted from it. Eeeek. No
X11 at all
have you tried emergeing x11-drivers/xf86-input-evdev and
x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse on their own without xorg?
Cheers
Kad
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> About a week ago, my Gentoo box was in a bad state where there were some
> packages that would not install, so
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 05:58:28 Grant wrote:
> I nmap'ed one of my remote Gentoo servers today and besides the
> expected open ports were these:
>
> 1080/tcp open socks
> 3128/tcp open squid-http
> 8080/tcp open http-proxy
>
> I'm not running any sort of proxy software that I know of and I sho
On Monday 10 May 2010 23:27:12 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Sonntag 09 Mai 2010, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
> > On Sunday 09 May 2010, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > > On Sonntag 09 Mai 2010, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 09 May 2010, walt wrote:
> > > > > This looks to me like a major
>> I nmap'ed one of my remote Gentoo servers today and besides the
>> expected open ports were these:
>>
>> 1080/tcp open socks
>> 3128/tcp open squid-http
>> 8080/tcp open http-proxy
>>
>> I'm not running any sort of proxy software that I know of and I should
>> be the only person whatsoever wi
Am 11.05.2010 03:58, schrieb Bill Kenworthy:
> Saw the news announcement that gnome 2.28 is stabilized - however
> looking at the header of gnome-base/gnome-2.28.2 (only 2.28 ebuild
> present) still shows ~x86 - do I have update problems or are there
> delays?
>
> Is this for amd64 only or has x86
22 matches
Mail list logo
