Kraus Philipp writes:
> Hello,
>
> I must test a software with a older version of the glibc. I run the
> 2.11.1 now but for one tool I need a previous version (2.6.1).
> How can I compile the glibc without changing my system glibc. I would
> like to set the previous glibc with the LD_PATH.
> Can
On 01.05.2010 um 09:48 wrote Graham Murray:
I think that the only way you can do this is to create a chroot jail,
in which you build everything using the old version of glibc (in a
very
similar way to building a new Gentoo system) and run your
application in
that.
That's a very goog idea
On Samstag 01 Mai 2010, Graham Murray wrote:
> Kraus Philipp writes:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I must test a software with a older version of the glibc. I run the
> > 2.11.1 now but for one tool I need a previous version (2.6.1).
> > How can I compile the glibc without changing my system glibc. I would
On 04/30/2010 07:29 PM, David W Noon wrote:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:20:02 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote about
[gentoo-user] Re: Compiling 32 bit library on x86_64:
On 04/30/2010 03:09 PM, David W Noon wrote:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 12:10:02 +0200, Roger Mason wrote about
[gentoo-user] Compiling 32
On 01.05.2010 um 10:32 wrote Volker Armin Hemmann:
On Samstag 01 Mai 2010, Graham Murray wrote:
Kraus Philipp writes:
Hello,
I must test a software with a older version of the glibc. I run the
2.11.1 now but for one tool I need a previous version (2.6.1).
How can I compile the glibc without
Mike Edenfield writes:
> On 4/30/2010 12:40 PM, Roger Mason wrote:
>> Mike Edenfield writes:
>>
>>> Have you tried using sys-devel/crossdev?
>>
>> Not in the present context.
>>
>>> It will set up the entire 32-bit cross-compiler environment for you;
>>> then it's just a matter of setting a c
On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 10:57 +0200, Kraus Philipp wrote:
>
> On 01.05.2010 um 10:32 wrote Volker Armin Hemmann:
>
> > On Samstag 01 Mai 2010, Graham Murray wrote:
> > > Kraus Philipp writes:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I must test a software with a older version of the glibc. I run
> > > > th
Hello.
Does anybody know if there is an application to convert to the mbox
format the email messages sent by groups.google.com in a digest format
to the group subscribers (if the subscriber choosed this format)?
Romildo
Am 01.05.2010 um 11:48 schrieb William Kenworthy:
On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 10:57 +0200, Kraus Philipp wrote:
On 01.05.2010 um 10:32 wrote Volker Armin Hemmann:
On Samstag 01 Mai 2010, Graham Murray wrote:
Kraus Philipp writes:
Hello,
I must test a software with a older version of the glibc
On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 12:25 +0200, Kraus Philipp wrote:
>
> Am 01.05.2010 um 11:48 schrieb William Kenworthy:
>
> > On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 10:57 +0200, Kraus Philipp wrote:
> > >
> > > On 01.05.2010 um 10:32 wrote Volker Armin Hemmann:
> > >
> > > > On Samstag 01 Mai 2010, Graham Murray wrote:
>
On 2010-04-30 15:24, Kraus Philipp wrote:
> I must test a software with a older version of the glibc. I run the
> 2.11.1 now but for one tool I need a previous version (2.6.1).
> How can I compile the glibc without changing my system glibc. I would
> like to set the previous glibc with the LD_PATH
Am 01.05.2010 um 12:40 schrieb William Kenworthy:
On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 12:25 +0200, Kraus Philipp wrote:
Am 01.05.2010 um 11:48 schrieb William Kenworthy:
On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 10:57 +0200, Kraus Philipp wrote:
On 01.05.2010 um 10:32 wrote Volker Armin Hemmann:
On Samstag 01 Mai 2010,
On Saturday 01 May 2010 10:57:31 Kraus Philipp wrote:
> On 01.05.2010 um 10:32 wrote Volker Armin Hemmann:
> > On Samstag 01 Mai 2010, Graham Murray wrote:
> >> Kraus Philipp writes:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I must test a software with a older version of the glibc. I run the
> >>> 2.11.1 now but
Am 01.05.2010 um 12:53 schrieb pk:
On 2010-04-30 15:24, Kraus Philipp wrote:
I must test a software with a older version of the glibc. I run the
2.11.1 now but for one tool I need a previous version (2.6.1).
How can I compile the glibc without changing my system glibc. I would
like to set the
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010, Paul Hartman wrote:
Use the --tree option in your emerge commandline so it will show which
packages are trying to pull in these.
I am using the -t flag - that's what I pasted earlier.
It looks like you're using
stable, I'm on ~amd64 and don't have these blocks so maybe i
On 4/30/10, Ajai Khattri wrote:
>
> I have unmerged ffmpeg, libraw1394 and libdc1394 and I still can't resolve
> this block:
>
> [nomerge ] media-video/ffmpeg-0.5_p20373 USE="X alsa amr encode
> hardcoded-tables ieee1394 ipv6 network theora threads vorbis x264 zlib
> (-3dnow) (-3dnowext) -al
I wrote:
> I just migrated a friend's machine to ~am64. Everything was updated,
> but after a reboot some partitons are not found. No wonder, there are
> no /dev/sd? devices, only /dev/sg?. I suspect the problem is udev,
> because that was updated. Root is encrypted, so this machine makes use
> of
For the past few weeks, I have noticed the following bizarre msg :
root:503 ~> emerge -Dup world
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies |
* Please fix your ebuild to not inherit the deprecated qt3.eclass
* Please fix your ebuild to not inherit the
On Sonntag 02 Mai 2010, Philip Webb wrote:
> For the past few weeks, I have noticed the following bizarre msg :
>
> root:503 ~> emerge -Dup world
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> Calculating dependencies |
> * Please fix your ebuild to not inherit the deprecated q
19 matches
Mail list logo
