Nikos Chantziaras [10-04-04 08:28]:
> On 04/04/2010 08:18 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >this is no security issue in sense of attacks...it is related
> >to the consistency of the system.
> >
> >Simple question (and may be complicate to answer... ;) )
> >
> >How can I check, that
Dale [10-04-04 08:20]:
> meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >this is no security issue in sense of attacks...it is related
> >to the consistency of the system.
> >
> >Simple question (and may be complicate to answer... ;) )
> >
> >How can I check, that my Gentoo system is uptodate, consistent
Dale [10-04-04 08:36]:
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >On 04/04/2010 08:18 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> >>
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>this is no security issue in sense of attacks...it is related
> >>to the consistency of the system.
> >>
> >>Simple question (and may be complicate to answer... ;) )
> >>
>
On 04/04/2010 10:07 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras [10-04-04 08:28]:
On 04/04/2010 08:18 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
this is no security issue in sense of attacks...it is related
to the consistency of the system.
Simple question (and may be complicate to answer... ;
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Dale [10-04-04 08:36]:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 04/04/2010 08:18 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
this is no security issue in sense of attacks...it is related
to the consistency of the system.
Simple question (and may be complicate to answe
On Sunday 04 April 2010 01:52:17 Adam wrote:
> > Probably neither. Can you Ctrl+F12 to see what the logs are
> > saying? I've been getting kernel Oops! on shutdown on one
> > machine of mine with the 2.6.31-gentoo-r10 kernel. Might be
> > similar
>
> Ok, i found this, which is mentioning fglrx,
Am 04.04.2010 07:18, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
> Hi,
>
> this is no security issue in sense of attacks...it is related
> to the consistency of the system.
>
> Simple question (and may be complicate to answer... ;) )
>
> How can I check, that my Gentoo system is uptodate, consistent
> and sane?
Try appending md=3,/dev/sdb3,/dev/sdc3 to the kernel command line
parameters.
On 04/04/2010 01:45 AM, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 16:07 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> The install is complete but it won't boot. grub finds the kernel
>> and starts booting but then I get the typical V
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
> On 04/04/2010 02:01, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> Tried changing root=/dev/md0. No change.
>>
>> The actual failure message is the fairly standard
>>
>> VFS - Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(9,0)
>
> [snip]
>
>> CONFIG_MD_RAID1=y
>
> That'
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 2:57 AM, Xavier Parizet wrote:
> Try appending md=3,/dev/sdb3,/dev/sdc3 to the kernel command line
> parameters.
>
Thanks. Tried that one last night but no luck, although it does change
the message to Unknown-block(9,3) from Unknown-block(9,0).
Cheers,
Mark
Hello Everyone!
I am trying to install gentoo on my eee1201h and used this howto:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/liveusb.xml
to setup a bootable SD card.
The system boots but depscan fail with
"line 128: /bin/chmod: Input/Output Error"
"line 139: Bus Error"
and a lot more.
Almost every command i
On 04/04/2010 15:20, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
On 04/04/2010 02:01, Mark Knecht wrote:
Tried changing root=/dev/md0. No change.
The actual failure message is the fairly standard
VFS - Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(9,0)
[snip]
CONFI
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Kerin Millar wrote:
> On 04/04/2010 15:20, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/04/2010 02:01, Mark Knecht wrote:
Tried changing root=/dev/md0. No change.
The actual failure message is the f
On 04/04/2010 18:50, Mark Knecht wrote:
[snip]
No problem supplying it. I did the rebuild this morning but forced
metadata to Type 1.0. No change as you suggested there wouldn't be.
OK, here's:
1) lspci to read& lspci -k to see drivers both from the non-RAID kernel
2) The RAID kernel config
Hi,
I am running a vanilla kernel (linux-2.6.32.11), This kernel uses
alsa-1.0.21.
When doing the eix-sync-thingy, emerge always suggests to update
to alsa-1.0.22.
Is there a way that emerge/eix or whatever relizes the version of
alsa which the kernel is runnig and only suggests updates which a
>Von: nor...@smash-net.org
>Datum: 04.04.2010 11:37
>An:
>Betreff: Re: [gentoo-user]
Checking sanity of system...
>
>Am 04.04.2010 07:18, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is no security
issue in sense of attacks...it is related
>> to the consistency of the system.
>>
>> Simple ques
Hi,
I have to move my whole system from one disk to another
bigger one.
I think of doing as follows:
Boot a system via CD/DVD (knoppix for example).
Mount small disk read-only
Mount bigger disk read-write
cd into mountpoint of the first one
cp -a . ../
Seems to me slow but correct? Or?
(I ha
On 04/04/2010 19:43, Mark Knecht wrote:
[snip]
Aside from all of that, notable options that are going to be required to
boot in your case are:
CONFIG_MD_RAID1
CONFIG_SATA_AHCI
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SD
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SR
CONFIG_MSDOS_PARTITION (normally implicit but worth mentioning)
That, and the opt
On 04/04/2010 20:05, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
I have to move my whole system from one disk to another
bigger one.
I think of doing as follows:
Boot a system via CD/DVD (knoppix for example).
Mount small disk read-only
Mount bigger disk read-write
cd into mountpoint of the first one
cp -
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
>
> Ah, that looks better. Not that I've pored over every line, but at first
> glance everything seems to be in order. There are no obvious gotchas that I
> can see, so I'm somewhat puzzled.
As am I!
>
> Here are a few random things that spri
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have to move my whole system from one disk to another
> bigger one.
>
> I think of doing as follows:
> Boot a system via CD/DVD (knoppix for example).
> Mount small disk read-only
> Mount bigger disk read-write
>
> cd into mountpoint of the first one
>
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 20:35:11 +0100, Kerin Millar wrote:
> Whichever way you go about it, ensure that no pseudo-filesystem or bind
> mounts are present within "/mnt/oldrootfs" at the time.
Use the -x option with rsync to stop it descending into other filesystems.
--
Neil Bothwick
Did you hear
On 04/04/2010 20:52, Mark Knecht wrote:
So this suggests that because I did the install from a running Gentoo
chroot that the mknod commands didn't stick? Somehow they were part
of, or because part of, the host Gentoo non-RAID install? Interesting.
I don't know what the handbook says these days
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 20:42:48 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> I am running a vanilla kernel (linux-2.6.32.11), This kernel uses
> alsa-1.0.21.
>
> When doing the eix-sync-thingy, emerge always suggests to update
> to alsa-1.0.22.
The 1.0.22 userspace tools work fine with the drivers in 2.6.32.
I'm running with full system FEATURES="test" on, and I have a couple of
programs that depended on dev-libs/boost. The boost testsuite always
fails in my computer due to insufficient disk space, I usually simply
skip the test for boost and just go on with the merge. But today, I
decided to let the t
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
> On 04/04/2010 20:52, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> So this suggests that because I did the install from a running Gentoo
>> chroot that the mknod commands didn't stick? Somehow they were part
>> of, or because part of, the host Gentoo non-RAID insta
On 04/04/2010 23:16, Mark Knecht wrote:
First, thanks for sticking with me on this. I really appreciate it.
Second, I apologize for the length of the reply but it's still not
working and I wanted to try and clearly show the steps I've taken.
Maybe you or someone else will see the step I'm mis
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
> On 04/04/2010 23:16, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> First, thanks for sticking with me on this. I really appreciate it.
>> Second, I apologize for the length of the reply but it's still not
>> working and I wanted to try and clearly show the steps
On 05/04/2010 00:12, Mark Knecht wrote:
1) If you don't specify metadata then you get the newest - I think
that's currently ver. 1.2 or something.
Interesting. I suppose that might be a change in mdadm-3.0 (a version
which I have yet to use to create any new arrays). However, that would
contr
Dnia 2010-04-04, o godz. 21:04:03
Neil Bothwick napisał(a):
> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 20:35:11 +0100, Kerin Millar wrote:
>
> > Whichever way you go about it, ensure that no pseudo-filesystem or
> > bind mounts are present within "/mnt/oldrootfs" at the time.
>
> Use the -x option with rsync to sto
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
> On 05/04/2010 00:12, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> 1) If you don't specify metadata then you get the newest - I think
>> that's currently ver. 1.2 or something.
>
> Interesting. I suppose that might be a change in mdadm-3.0 (a version which
> I have
On 05/04/2010 00:51, Kacper Kopczyński wrote:
Dnia 2010-04-04, o godz. 21:04:03
Neil Bothwick napisał(a):
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 20:35:11 +0100, Kerin Millar wrote:
Whichever way you go about it, ensure that no pseudo-filesystem or
bind mounts are present within "/mnt/oldrootfs" at the time.
On 05/04/2010 00:58, Mark Knecht wrote:
One thing about this that still confuses me is where /dev/md3, or
whatever, comes from when I boot if the the mknod command is never
executed within the chrrot. (As per the install guide.) Not a big deal
to proceed and see what happens. Maybe the kernel jus
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
>> On 05/04/2010 00:12, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>>
>>> 1) If you don't specify metadata then you get the newest - I think
>>> that's currently ver. 1.2 or something.
>>
>> Interesting. I suppose t
On 04/04/2010 07:20 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
keeper ~ # diff /usr/src/linux/.config /mnt/gentoo/usr/src/linux/.config
4c4
< # Mon Mar 29 01:02:31 2010
---
# Sun Apr 4 06:28:53 2010
893,912c893,906
< CONFIG_MD_LINEAR=m
< CONFIG_MD_RAID0=m
Hi Mark,
Interesting thread, and I'm learning a lo
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 5:47 PM, walt wrote:
> On 04/04/2010 07:20 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> keeper ~ # diff /usr/src/linux/.config /mnt/gentoo/usr/src/linux/.config
>> 4c4
>> < # Mon Mar 29 01:02:31 2010
>> ---
>>>
>>> # Sun Apr 4 06:28:53 2010
>>
>> 893,912c893,906
>> < CONFIG_MD_LINEAR=m
On 04/04/2010 11:42 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
I am running a vanilla kernel (linux-2.6.32.11), This kernel uses
alsa-1.0.21.
When doing the eix-sync-thingy, emerge always suggests to update
to alsa-1.0.22.
Do you have media-sound/alsa-driver installed? If so, that is the
cause of y
On 04/04/2010 01:04 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 20:35:11 +0100, Kerin Millar wrote:
Whichever way you go about it, ensure that no pseudo-filesystem or bind
mounts are present within "/mnt/oldrootfs" at the time.
Use the -x option with rsync to stop it descending into other fi
On 05/04/2010 02:34, walt wrote:
On 04/04/2010 01:04 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 20:35:11 +0100, Kerin Millar wrote:
Whichever way you go about it, ensure that no pseudo-filesystem or bind
mounts are present within "/mnt/oldrootfs" at the time.
Use the -x option with rsync t
http://sites.google.com/site/gni8hy9ojm/icfa5w
Neil Bothwick [10-04-05 01:32]:
> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 20:42:48 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> > I am running a vanilla kernel (linux-2.6.32.11), This kernel uses
> > alsa-1.0.21.
> >
> > When doing the eix-sync-thingy, emerge always suggests to update
> > to alsa-1.0.22.
>
> The 1.0.22 us
walt [10-04-05 05:02]:
> On 04/04/2010 11:42 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >I am running a vanilla kernel (linux-2.6.32.11), This kernel uses
> >alsa-1.0.21.
> >
> >When doing the eix-sync-thingy, emerge always suggests to update
> >to alsa-1.0.22.
>
> Do you have media-sound/al
Hi,
adding Gentoo/emerge related stuff to the completion system of the zsh
is nice...but getting a dark blue color for parts of the prompt with
that is not.
Where can I tuirn what to modifiy the color or get back my previous
prompt?
Best regards,
mcc
--
Please don't send me any Word- or Powe
43 matches
Mail list logo
