Dale wrote:
> mkisofs
>
> ---
>
> 2097493
>
> /usr/bin/mkisofs: Warning: Cannot add inode hints with -no-cache-inodes.
I strongly recommend not to use the option -no-cache-inodes.
This option causes mkisofs not to check for hard links. As a rersult,
the filesystem is bigger t
Dale wrote:
> > growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/dvd=/path/to/file.iso
> >
> > At least you'll have a better idea where the problem lies.
> >
> >
>
> Could I just get rid of one of the programs or are they all part of the
> same package? I suspect a mismatch of package versions which is why I
Dale wrote:
> Used versions
> ---
> cdrecord: 2.1.1a77
>
> cdrecord
> ---
> scsidev: '/dev/hdd'
> devname: '/dev/hdd'
> scsibus: -2 target: -2 lun: -2
> Warning: Open by 'devname' is unintentional and not supported.
> Linux sg driver version: 3.5.27
> SCSI
Dale wrote:
> This is hopefully the last update. I have now burned several DVDs,
> including the ones that failed earlier, with no errors at all. I guess
> the newer version of cdrtools has some issues which may be why it is not
> in stable yet. ;-)
There are no known issues with cdrtools
Mike Edenfield wrote:
> On 3/30/2010 1:00 PM, Dale wrote:
>
> > status: 0x2 (CHECK CONDITION)
> > Sense Bytes: 70 00 03 00 00 00 00 0A 00 00 00 00 73 03 00 00
> > Sense Key: 0x3 Medium Error, Segment 0
> > Sense Code: 0x73 Qual 0x03 (power calibration area error) Fru 0x0
> > Sense flags: Blk 0 (n
Dale wrote:
> I see your points but it just finished burning about 6 more very full
> DVDs with not one single error. They burned with no prompts other than
> the usual things it does to confirm what I am doing, such as overwriting
> a DVD with data on it. Since it was failing basically eve
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Dale wrote:
Used versions
---
cdrecord: 2.1.1a77
cdrecord
---
scsidev: '/dev/hdd'
devname: '/dev/hdd'
scsibus: -2 target: -2 lun: -2
Warning: Open by 'devname' is unintentional and not supported.
Linux sg driver version: 3.5.2
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Dale wrote:
I see your points but it just finished burning about 6 more very full
DVDs with not one single error. They burned with no prompts other than
the usual things it does to confirm what I am doing, such as overwriting
a DVD with data on it. Since it was fa
Dale wrote:
> After downgrading to a stable cdrtools, I don't have any failing media.
> I have been using the same drive and media for quite a while tho. I
There is a difference between "after" downgrading and _from_ downgrading.
It you really mean _after_ downgrading, there is no way to hel
Dale wrote:
> OK. I thought I would try some different versions of software and see
> what happens. With the info Neil provided about what does what, I
> thought I would try a different version of cdrtools. I went to a older
> version and it worked fine on the first try with my backup file.
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Dale wrote:
OK. I thought I would try some different versions of software and see
what happens. With the info Neil provided about what does what, I
thought I would try a different version of cdrtools. I went to a older
version and it worked fine on the first try w
Hi,
I googled down some - often fairly outdated - texts about "the
best filesystem" fpr a Linux box. Other texts focussed on
uses, which do not aplly to me: Fileservers, webservers, database
machines etc.
Wnat I want is a fast and stable (!) filesystem for a desktop PC
with one 1TByte harddi
I have been using reiserfs ( 3, not 4 ) for several years and have found it
to recover without any problems from "dirty" shutdowns, at most I've had to
use reiserfstools to fix the filesystem. I had no such luck with ext3,
although as a journalled filesystem in theory it should do the same. I have
Its kind of tricky question :) and if You look closely You could find
som flames about it :P
Iam using ReiserFS for my root and xfs for the rest and testing btrfs.
I never gets any problem with "broken partition table" etc. (and i
experienced several "quick power downs").
But reiserfs have some p
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
I googled down some - often fairly outdated - texts about "the
best filesystem" fpr a Linux box. Other texts focussed on
uses, which do not aplly to me: Fileservers, webservers, database
machines etc.
Wnat I want is a fast and stable (!) filesystem for a desktop
Dale [10-04-01 20:36]:
> meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I googled down some - often fairly outdated - texts about "the
> >best filesystem" fpr a Linux box. Other texts focussed on
> >uses, which do not aplly to me: Fileservers, webservers, database
> >machines etc.
> >
> >Wnat I want is
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
thanks for all the input to all who have answered ! :)
I will try to characterize ("characterise" ?) what I plan to do with
my TByte disk.
My current drive is 200GByte and it becomes too small...
I DONT LIKE (read: hate) to put CDs or DVDs into my drive, to mount
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:02:20 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Your media was either accepted after several tries by the drive for
> unknown reasons and is now usable in general again or you are observing
> a problem caused by "hald".
OMG Jörg! Do you have any idea what you've done?
--
Neil Both
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> Your media was either accepted after several tries by the drive for unknown
> reasons and is now usable in general again or you are observing a problem
> caused by "hald". Note that hald does not care about the CD/DVD/BD Writing
> process a
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:02:20 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > Your media was either accepted after several tries by the drive for
> > unknown reasons and is now usable in general again or you are observing
> > a problem caused by "hald".
>
> OMG Jörg! Do you have any ide
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:02:20 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Your media was either accepted after several tries by the drive for
unknown reasons and is now usable in general again or you are observing
a problem caused by "hald".
OM
I have two identical HD in the box and want to duplicate sda to sdb;
sdb is not even partitioned.
I think I could do:
dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb
but I need to boot from CD isn't it?
I would like the second disk to function as an identical bootable backup (just
in case something will malfuncti
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Joseph wrote:
> I have two identical HD in the box and want to duplicate sda to sdb;
> sdb is not even partitioned.
> I think I could do:
> dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb
> but I need to boot from CD isn't it?
Yes, basically, boot from USB or CD and use ddrescue to clo
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Joseph wrote:
>> I have two identical HD in the box and want to duplicate sda to sdb;
>> sdb is not even partitioned.
>> I think I could do:
>> dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb
>> but I need to boot from CD isn't it?
On 04/01/10 17:43, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Joseph wrote:
I have two identical HD in the box and want to duplicate sda to sdb;
sdb is not even partitioned.
I think I could do:
dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb
but I need t
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Joseph wrote:
> On 04/01/10 17:43, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Paul Hartman
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Joseph wrote:
I have two identical HD in the box and want to duplicate sda to sdb;
sdb is not
On 04/01/2010 06:40 PM, Joseph wrote:
On 04/01/10 17:43, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Joseph wrote:
I have two identical HD in the box and want to duplicate sda to sdb;
sdb is not even partitioned.
I think I could do:
27 matches
Mail list logo
