Hi,
I'm running a gentoo system on a computer with an intel onboard
graphics card. lspci says:
(snip)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ Integrated
Graphics Controller (rev 02)
00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics
Controller (re
Hi all,
A few weeks ago there was a discussion about audio interference when
running 3d applications.
Well mine kept getting worse (it didn't to it at all a month ago) until
I got fed up. I opened the side and (gently!) moved some of the power
cables away from the data cables to see if that
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:58:53 +0100, Xav' wrote:
> Hi everyone !
>
> I've setted up a Xen server with kernel 2.6.18-r12 with 2 SATAII disks
> of 750Go and with the following partitions scheme :
> dom0 ~ # sfdisk -l
>
> Disk /dev/sda: 91201 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors/track
> Units = cylind
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:32:15 +, Matt Harrison wrote:
> I can't see how I could have properly killed some hardware just by
> moving a cable an inch to one side.
Did you touch a grounded object before putting your hand inside the case.
A static discharge could kill the motherboard.
--
Neil
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:32:15 +, Matt Harrison wrote:
I can't see how I could have properly killed some hardware just by
moving a cable an inch to one side.
Did you touch a grounded object before putting your hand inside the case.
A static discharge could kill the moth
Matt Harrison wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A few weeks ago there was a discussion about audio interference when
> running 3d applications.
>
> Well mine kept getting worse (it didn't to it at all a month ago)
> until I got fed up. I opened the side and (gently!) moved some of the
> power cables away from t
Dale wrote:
Matt Harrison wrote:
Hi all,
A few weeks ago there was a discussion about audio interference when
running 3d applications.
Well mine kept getting worse (it didn't to it at all a month ago)
until I got fed up. I opened the side and (gently!) moved some of the
power cables away from
Dale wrote:
Matt Harrison wrote:
Dale wrote:
Matt Harrison wrote:
Hi all,
A few weeks ago there was a discussion about audio interference when
running 3d applications.
Well mine kept getting worse (it didn't to it at all a month ago)
until I got fed up. I opened the side and (gently!) moved
On Wednesday 14 January 2009 08:58:11 Mick wrote:
> Peter, ldap is only required if you are authenticating clients on your
> LAN/WAN using an ldap server. If you had hundreds of clients and a need
> to manage frequently changing client membership and passwds, then ldap
> would be desirable to man
Matt Harrison wrote:
> Dale wrote:
>> Matt Harrison wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> A few weeks ago there was a discussion about audio interference when
>>> running 3d applications.
>>>
>>> Well mine kept getting worse (it didn't to it at all a month ago)
>>> until I got fed up. I opened the side and (g
Am Thursday 15 January 2009 10:43:52 schrieb Xav':
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:58:53 +0100, Xav' wrote:
> > I've setted up a Xen server with kernel 2.6.18-r12 with 2 SATAII disks
> > of 750Go and with the following partitions scheme :
> > dom0 ~ # sfdisk -l
> > ...
> > After that bugs, there is man
On Tuesday 13 January 2009 22:50:55 Mark Knecht wrote:
[...]
> Compiling
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/python-2.5.2-r7/image//usr/lib/python2.5/zipfile.py
>...
[???]
> make: *** [libinstall] Error 1
> *
> * ERROR: dev-lang/python-2.5.2-r7 failed.
[...]
You've snipped the useful part, where I've
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:32 AM, Matt Harrison
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A few weeks ago there was a discussion about audio interference when running
> 3d applications.
>
> Well mine kept getting worse (it didn't to it at all a month ago) until I
> got fed up. I opened the side and (gently!) moved some
Dan Cowsill wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:32 AM, Matt Harrison
wrote:
Hi all,
A few weeks ago there was a discussion about audio interference when running
3d applications.
Well mine kept getting worse (it didn't to it at all a month ago) until I
got fed up. I opened the side and (gently!)
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Matt Harrison
wrote:
> Thanks for the detailed information. I have some news, but it requires me to
> put on my embarrassed face.
No need to be embarrassed! I work in the repair industry and I can't
tell you how many times I've run into the same thing. The worst
2009/1/15 Peter Humphrey :
> On Wednesday 14 January 2009 08:58:11 Mick wrote:
>> Increasing the verbosity of the access and error cups logs will show you
>> what you need to (re)configure.
>
> It hasn't shown me yet, but I'll keep on plugging away at running test
> cases.
>
> Thanks to all for he
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Wolfgang Liebich
wrote:
> Furthermore yesterday I had a total lockup when I came to work at the
> morning --- could not login at kdm, kdm would ignore all keyboard
> input etc. I had to do a hard restart with the "Magic SysRQ" key
> (remount ro, hard reboot).
Do y
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:38:57 +1030
Rick Harris wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:32:31 am John wrote:
> > Nothing in Xorg logs, system logs
> > Lockup is complete - machine is totally unresposive even to ssh/ping
> > x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-177.82
> > Kernel version 2.6.27-gentoo-r7
> > Card is
Hi,
I have a machine I haven't touched in about 6 months that I need to
update. I've got one block that tells me (correctly) that it's part of
system. It should be as I'm updating system.
Anyway, it is OK to remove this block and then proceed with the
system emerge, correct?
I have alrea
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:24:33 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>Anyway, it is OK to remove this block and then proceed with the
> system emerge, correct?
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gnuconfig-20080123 [20070724] 0 kB [?=>0]
> [ebuild U ] app-arch/lzma-utils-4
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:24:33 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>>Anyway, it is OK to remove this block and then proceed with the
>> system emerge, correct?
>>
>> Calculating dependencies... done!
>> [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gnuconfig-20080123
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:24:55 -0500
Dan Cowsill wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Matt Harrison
> wrote:
> > Thanks for the detailed information. I have some news, but it
> > requires me to put on my embarrassed face.
>
> No need to be embarrassed! I work in the repair industry and I can
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:30 PM, David Relson wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:24:55 -0500
> Dan Cowsill wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Matt Harrison
>> wrote:
>> > Thanks for the detailed information. I have some news, but it
>> > requires me to put on my embarrassed face.
>>
>> No
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:24:33 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>>Anyway, it is OK to remove this block and then proceed with the
>> system emerge, correct?
>>
>> Calculating dependencies... done!
>> [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gnuconfig-20080123
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:07 +0100, Geralt wrote:
> > You don't need to remove anything, just let portage handle the block
> > for you. Blocks marked with a b (instead of a B) can be handled by
> > recent portage releases.
> are you sure that his works in this case? This blocking bug was some
> t
Hi,
I recently did an emerge --update --deep world, which resulted in a rebuild of
the ffmpeg library.
The libavcodec library went from version 51 to 52, which broke transcode. The
--deep argument did not find the dependency there and rebuild transcode.
On my FreeBSD server, portupgrade has th
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
Hi,
I recently did an emerge --update --deep world, which resulted in a rebuild of
the ffmpeg library.
The libavcodec library went from version 51 to 52, which broke transcode. The
--deep argument did not find the dependency there and rebuild transcode.
On my Free
Joshua D Doll wrote:
> Michael P. Soulier wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I recently did an emerge --update --deep world, which resulted in a
>> rebuild of
>> the ffmpeg library.
>> The libavcodec library went from version 51 to 52, which broke
>> transcode. The
>> --deep argument did not find the dependency t
On 15/01/09 Joshua D Doll said:
> I'm thinking you might want to check out revdep-rebuild from the gentoolkit
> package.
I'm not sure that would find the dependency, since transcode dynamically loads
said module at runtime, AFAICT. Perhaps that is the issue.
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier
"Any in
2009/1/15 Neil Bothwick
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:07 +0100, Geralt wrote:
>
> > > You don't need to remove anything, just let portage handle the block
> > > for you. Blocks marked with a b (instead of a B) can be handled by
> > > recent portage releases.
>
> > are you sure that his works in thi
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> On 15/01/09 Joshua D Doll said:
>
>
>> I'm thinking you might want to check out revdep-rebuild from the gentoolkit
>> package.
>>
>
> I'm not sure that would find the dependency, since transcode dynamically loads
> said module at runtime, AFAICT. Perhaps that is
Hi,
Does anyone here use uvesafb? I followed the instructions to install
uvesafb from this page:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spock/projects/uvesafb/
However, it does not work. Is it required to use initrd in order to
use uvesafb? (because I don't use it...)
the 80x25 looks absolutely horrible and I'
Hi all,
In Bash /dev/tcp/host/port can be used to write to a TCP socket. This
works nicely so I was very curious whether it would work the other way
too: is it possible to have a Bash script listen on a particular port
as if it were a server? I couldn't find anything in the Bash manual
about it. G
Paul Hartman wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone here use uvesafb? I followed the instructions to install
uvesafb from this page:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spock/projects/uvesafb/
However, it does not work. Is it required to use initrd in order to
use uvesafb? (because I don't use it...)
the 80x25 looks abso
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 09:35:11AM -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Wolfgang Liebich
> wrote:
> > Furthermore yesterday I had a total lockup when I came to work at the
> > morning --- could not login at kdm, kdm would ignore all keyboard
> > input etc. I had to do a ha
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Paul Hartman wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does anyone here use uvesafb? I followed the instructions to install
>> uvesafb from this page:
>>
>> http://dev.gentoo.org/~spock/projects/uvesafb/
>>
>> However, it does not work. Is it required to u
Wolfgang Liebich wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 09:35:11AM -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Wolfgang Liebich
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Furthermore yesterday I had a total lockup when I came to work at the
>>> morning --- could not login at kdm, kdm would ignore all
Hi,
I've completed my switch from tetex to texlive 2007 now. I'm (normally)
running only stable packages, so texlive is still at 2007.
What's keeping texlive 2008 from being stable?
Just asking...
- Wolfgang
Hi!
I use ~amd64.
1. Just after synching I have:
emerge -pvDuN world
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ] sys-devel/gcc-4.2.4-r1 [4.2.4] USE="fortran gcj mudflap
(multilib) nls openmp (-altivec) -bootstrap -build -doc -gtk (-
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Dale wrote:
> Wolfgang Liebich wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 09:35:11AM -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Wolfgang Liebich
>>> wrote:
>>>
Furthermore yesterday I had a total lockup when I came to work at the
morning
Wolfgang Liebich schrieb:
> Hi,
> I've completed my switch from tetex to texlive 2007 now. I'm (normally)
> running only stable packages, so texlive is still at 2007.
> What's keeping texlive 2008 from being stable?
> Just asking...
> - Wolfgang
>
>
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253990
Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Dale wrote:
>
>> Wolfgang Liebich wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 09:35:11AM -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Wolfgang Liebich
wrote:
> Furthermore yest
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone here use uvesafb? I followed the instructions to install
> uvesafb from this page:
>
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~spock/projects/uvesafb/
>
> However, it does not work. Is it required to use initrd in order to
> use uvesafb? (
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:14 AM, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I use ~amd64.
>
> 1. Just after synching I have:
>
> emerge -pvDuN world
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gcc-4.2.4-r1 [4.2.4] USE="fortran
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Dale wrote:
> Paul Hartman wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Dale wrote:
>>
>>> Wolfgang Liebich wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 09:35:11AM -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Wolfgang Liebich
> wrote:
45 matches
Mail list logo
