On Sunday 13 July 2008, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 08:44:51AM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote
>
> > > chip *ALWAYS* comes up as eth1.
> >
> > Udev is doing this. If you have removed the second card,
> > delete /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules, otherwise edit
> > the file to sw
On Saturday 12 July 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > You don't need a Gentoo system to install Gentoo, all you need is
> > something that can deal with the filesystem you want to use, tar
> > and zip/bzip. Theoretically, even Windows could do it.
>
> Don't you need chroot too? I suppose you could ins
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 19:55:56 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > Udev is doing this. If you have removed the second card,
> > delete /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules, otherwise edit the
> > file to switch the assignments for the two NICs.
>
> Thanks. A "new and improved helpfull feature"
Hi,
I don't want to make your work bad.
After thinking it over I think it is actually a useful script, because
it adds a little bit more security to editing the package.use file
(I'm always fearing the day when I'm writing echo "stuff" >
/etc/portage/package.use").
But do you know that package.us
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:10:15 -0500, Dale wrote:
> d- 2 ivman plugdev 112 2008-07-12 03:08 hdd
This is weird, the ownership is correct (you need to belong to the
plugdev group to use automounted devices) but the permissions certainly
are not. Do you have any rules for this in /etc/udev/r
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 19:10:12 -0500, Dale wrote:
> I re-emerged udev and noticed this little foot note:
>
> mount options for directory /dev are no longer
> set in /etc/udev/udev.conf, but in /etc/fstab
> as for other directories.
>
> I don't have anything in fstab for /udev. This is what mount
Gentoo User wrote:
Hi,
I don't want to make your work bad.
After thinking it over I think it is actually a useful script, because
it adds a little bit more security to editing the package.use file
(I'm always fearing the day when I'm writing echo "stuff" >
/etc/portage/package.use").
But do you
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:10:15 -0500, Dale wrote:
d- 2 ivman plugdev 112 2008-07-12 03:08 hdd
This is weird, the ownership is correct (you need to belong to the
plugdev group to use automounted devices) but the permissions certainly
are not. Do you have an
On 7/13/08, Mikko Husari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i did not found (nor did i look for long enough) any tools/scripts to
> easily manage package.use file, so i did my own. now i started to think
> that, if there really is not any, my creation would be sufficient
> (although possibly buggy) for m
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:19:56 +0300, Mikko Husari wrote:
> greetings earthlings,
What about the rest of us?
> i did not found (nor did i look for long enough) any tools/scripts to
> easily manage package.use file,
% eix flagedit
[I] app-portage/flagedit
Available versions: 0.0.5 0.0.7
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:19:56 +0300, Mikko Husari wrote:
greetings earthlings,
What about the rest of us?
i did not found (nor did i look for long enough) any tools/scripts to
easily manage package.use file,
% eix flagedit
[I] app-portage/flagedit
Arttu V. wrote:
On 7/13/08, Mikko Husari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i did not found (nor did i look for long enough) any tools/scripts to
easily manage package.use file, so i did my own. now i started to think
that, if there really is not any, my creation would be sufficient
(although possibl
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 15:50:39 +0300, Mikko Husari wrote:
> thanks for pointing out better solution. it looks nice and has more
> features. it would be excellent if it could "guess" the pkg-name with
> 'emerge -s' like mine does.
How about a wrapper script that uses the guessing from your script
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 15:50:39 +0300, Mikko Husari wrote:
thanks for pointing out better solution. it looks nice and has more
features. it would be excellent if it could "guess" the pkg-name with
'emerge -s' like mine does.
How about a wrapper script that uses the
On 7/12/08, Arttu V. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> then see if I get around later to try with cdrtools instead of wodim (cdrkit).
Ok, my final conclusion on splitpipe: it compiles but won't work for me.
I've produced about a dozen coasters while having tried some
combinations of two different mach
On Sunday 13 July 2008, Mikko Husari wrote:
> i did not know that, (also the script ignores make.conf ). how does
> that directory approach work, any documentation about it?
man 5 portage
see the section "/etc/portage/"
--
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
--
gentoo-user@lists.
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:38:07 +0200, Gentoo User wrote:
> (I'm always fearing the day when I'm writing echo "stuff" >
> /etc/portage/package.use").
Put "set -o noclobber" in your profile.
--
Neil Bothwick
We are from the planet Taglinis. Take us to your reader!
signature.asc
Description: PGP
Hi group,
I would like to raise my voice against the use of overly long subject lines
that run out of space on the line provided.
Complete sentences are not necessary. A few, well chosen words should suffice
and spare the user the nuisance of opening mail that ultimately is of no value
to him.
On Sonntag, 13. Juli 2008, maxim wexler wrote:
> Hi group,
>
> I would like to raise my voice against the use of overly long subject lines
> that run out of space on the line provided.
what is 'overly long' and what space are you talking about?
>
> Complete sentences are not necessary. A few, wel
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Sonntag, 13. Juli 2008, maxim wexler wrote:
Hi group,
I would like to raise my voice against the use of overly long subject lines
that run out of space on the line provided.
what is 'overly long' and what space are you talking about?
Complete senten
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:40:08AM -0700, maxim wexler wrote:
> I would like to raise my voice against the use of overly long subject lines
> that run out of space on the line provided.
>
> Complete sentences are not necessary. A few, well chosen words should suffice
> and spare the user the nu
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:23:09 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Under what circumstances does too much info hurt? It's not like a PhD
> thesis, it's just, say, 10 words instead of 2 or 3.
When viewed on a narrow screen and the first few words convey no useful
information on their own. I think the
Dale ha scritto:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
I prefer as much info as possible myself. Sometimes the subject can be
one thing but because there is little info in it, it turns out to be
something else. Of course, a error message can be really nice too.
It's good if you are searching for th
Hi All,
I noticed that when I ping my router using Linux I get time=3.5ms for say
packets -s 4096. When I run the same test using MSWindows I get 1ms perhaps
2ms but no more.
Before I discard MSWindows ping results as flawed, would you know of a good
reason to explain this difference? Aren't
On Sunday 13 July 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:40:08AM -0700, maxim wexler wrote:
> > I would like to raise my voice against the use of overly long subject
> > lines that run out of space on the line provided.
> >
> > Complete sentences are not necessary. A few, well
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Mick wrote:
| On Sunday 13 July 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:40:08AM -0700, maxim wexler wrote:
|>> I would like to raise my voice against the use of overly long subject
|>> lines that run out of space on the line pro
A few days ago, I used eselect to switch profiles, from
default-linux/x86/2007.0/desktop to default/linux/x86/2008.0/desktop.
A lot of USE flags were removed from my make.conf, including
the cpu-optimizations such as sse and mmx. After re-compiling a few
things and getting warnings from the ebu
> > (I'm always fearing the day when I'm writing echo "stuff" >
> > /etc/portage/package.use").
>
>
> Put "set -o noclobber" in your profile.
Cool, thanks :-)
But is there a way to overwrite an existing file when this option is enabled?
Geralt
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 02:19:51 +0200, Gentoo User wrote:
> > Put "set -o noclobber" in your profile.
> Cool, thanks :-)
> But is there a way to overwrite an existing file when this option is
> enabled?
echo "stuff" >|file
--
Neil Bothwick
IBM - I Blame Microsoft
signature.asc
Description: P
ot;emake failed with ${GCC_MAKE_TARGET}";
* The die message:
* emake failed with profiledbootstrap
*
* If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if
relevant.
* A complete build log is located at
'/var/log/portage/sys-devel:gcc-4.3.1-r1:20080713-202441.lo
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Side point: it never ceases to amaze me the extent to which people think
> installation is some magical procedure with voodoo in it, or that a
> program (which is not installed yet!) somehow manages to install
> itself.
>
>
John covici wrote:
Hi. I am having problems compiling gcc vrsions 4.2.4 or 4.3.1-r1.
The errors are very similar -- here is what I am getting when
compiling 4.3.1-r1.
For GCC 4.3.x you need to update sys-libs/glibc. You need at least 2.7-r2.
I'm using GCC 4.3.x on my system and it emerged fi
on Monday 07/14/2008 Nikos Chantziaras([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> John covici wrote:
> > Hi. I am having problems compiling gcc vrsions 4.2.4 or 4.3.1-r1.
> > The errors are very similar -- here is what I am getting when
> > compiling 4.3.1-r1.
>
> For GCC 4.3.x you need to update sys-libs/
John covici wrote:
on Monday 07/14/2008 Nikos Chantziaras([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> John covici wrote:
> > Hi. I am having problems compiling gcc vrsions 4.2.4 or 4.3.1-r1.
> > The errors are very similar -- here is what I am getting when
> > compiling 4.3.1-r1.
>
> For GCC 4.3.x you nee
* »Q« ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [14.07.08 01:16]:
> A few days ago, I used eselect to switch profiles, from
> default-linux/x86/2007.0/desktop to default/linux/x86/2008.0/desktop.
>
As I did...
> A lot of USE flags were removed from my make.conf, including
> the cpu-optimizations such as sse and mmx
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:39:17 +0300
"Arttu V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/12/08, Arttu V. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > then see if I get around later to try with cdrtools instead of
> > wodim (cdrkit).
>
> Ok, my final conclusion on splitpipe: it compiles but won't work for
> me.
>
> I'v
36 matches
Mail list logo
