Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4 overlay

Am Freitag, 11. Januar 2008 schrieb Alan McKinnon: > Anyone know where this overlay disappeared to? http://genkdesvn.mailstation.de HTH... Dirk signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-user] Ebuilds for additional campaigns for games-strategy/wesnoth

Am Freitag, 11. Januar 2008 schrieb Hemmann, Volker Armin: > On Freitag, 11. Januar 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > > > > Before I open a bug for this, are ther any such ebuilds? I know they > > don't exist in portage, but maybe in some overlay I'm not aware of. > > you can't do that because the user

[gentoo-user] Daniel Robbins' come back ?

Daniel Robbins offers to take back Gentoo leadership. What about it ? Read http://blog.funtoo.org/2008/01/here-my-offer.html -- ~adj~ -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] HTML vs. Text messages (WAS: Is GWN dead?)

On Saturday 12 January 2008, Hal Martin wrote: > I'll keep that in mind when I am sending email to the list from > Thunderbird. I'm also aware that many corporations block HTML mail to > lower the risk of a staff member opening up an infected/laced email > (generally on a Windows computer) so text

Re: [gentoo-user] Daniel Robbins' come back ?

On Saturday 12 January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Daniel Robbins offers to take back Gentoo leadership. > What about it ? Read > http://blog.funtoo.org/2008/01/here-my-offer.html I've kept very quiet about Gentoo politics for a long time, but Daniel's blog has promoted me to finally open my

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4 overlay

On Saturday 12 January 2008, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: > On Friday 11 January 2008 22:26:34 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Anyone know where this overlay disappeared to? > > It moved to git. Assuming dev-util/git is installed: Yes, that was it, thanks. I assumed I had git installed. I was wrong. > # l

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4 overlay

On Saturday 12 January 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > Am Freitag, 11. Januar 2008 schrieb Alan McKinnon: > > Anyone know where this overlay disappeared to? > > http://genkdesvn.mailstation.de Thanks Dirk -- Alan McKinnon alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailin

Re: [gentoo-user] HTML vs. Text messages (WAS: Is GWN dead?)

Mick wrote: > > Hmm, he may be waiting for you to do it, while you're explaining to all these > moms out there why you may think that top-posting in this ML would be > considered good netiquette? BTW, I'm not condoning thread hi-jacking > either . . . > > To Dale: have you tried setting up new

Re: [gentoo-user] HTML vs. Text messages (WAS: Is GWN dead?)

On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 05:33:24 -0600, Dale wrote: > Thanks. I didn't know you could change that in the address book. Can > you tell me how this one comes through? It should be plain text, > hopefully only plain text. It is :) -- Neil Bothwick Trekkers work out in the `He's Dead Gym'. signa

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Is GWN dead?

On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 03:29:34 +0100, b.n. wrote: > Moreover, I'd go on to say that the fact Gentoo is installable from > almost every reasonable Linux-based live cd is a defining Gentoo > feature. It doesn't even need a live CD. I installed Ubuntu when I first got this laptop, because I needed a L

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo LiveUSB

On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 15:27 -0500, Ritesh Kumar wrote: > On Jan 11, 2008 3:00 PM, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > On Friday 11 January 2008, Anthony E. Caudel wrote: > > 2nd question: I must be dense on this one so someone help me > out. > > Since a USB

Re: [gentoo-user] HTML vs. Text messages (WAS: Is GWN dead?)

On Saturday 12 January 2008, Dale wrote: > Mick wrote: > > Hmm, he may be waiting for you to do it, while you're explaining to all > > these moms out there why you may think that top-posting in this ML would > > be considered good netiquette? BTW, I'm not condoning thread hi-jacking > > either . .

Re: [gentoo-user] Ebuilds for additional campaigns for games-strategy/wesnoth

On Samstag, 12. Januar 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > Am Freitag, 11. Januar 2008 schrieb Hemmann, Volker Armin: > > On Freitag, 11. Januar 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > > > Before I open a bug for this, are ther any such ebuilds? I know they > > > don't exist in portage, but maybe in some overlay I

Re: [gentoo-user] Daniel Robbins' come back ?

Well, it's like if I am opening my eyes. I never looked at what the foundation was supposed to do. For a couple of years I've been using gentoo, I never get any political announcement, maybe because I didn't look at the right place, or maybe there was no. I mean that except the Gentoo's Philosophy

Re: [gentoo-user] Daniel Robbins' come back ?

On Saturday 12 January 2008, Jil Larner wrote: > Well, it's like if I am opening my eyes. I never looked at what the > foundation was supposed to do. For a couple of years I've been using > gentoo, I never get any political announcement, maybe because I didn't > look at the right place, or maybe th

Re: [gentoo-user] HTML vs. Text messages (WAS: Is GWN dead?)

Mick wrote: > On Saturday 12 January 2008, Dale wrote: > >> >> Thanks. I didn't know you could change that in the address book. Can >> you tell me how this one comes through? It should be plain text, >> hopefully only plain text. >> >> Neat trick. ;-) >> > > OK, this is plain text as I

Re: [gentoo-user] Daniel Robbins' come back ?

Mick wrote: > On Saturday 12 January 2008, Jil Larner wrote: > >> Well, it's like if I am opening my eyes. I never looked at what the >> foundation was supposed to do. For a couple of years I've been using >> gentoo, I never get any political announcement, maybe because I didn't >> look at the r

Re: [gentoo-user] HTML vs. Text messages (WAS: Is GWN dead?)

On Saturday 12 January 2008, Dale wrote: > Mick wrote: > > . . . but you responded to a plain text message from the list, which as I > > recall you could always do. The problem I believe is when you start a > > new message. Email me off list with a new message and I will confirm if > > it is als

Re: [gentoo-user] Daniel Robbins' come back ?

On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 07:34 -0600, Dale wrote: > Mick wrote: > > On Saturday 12 January 2008, Jil Larner wrote: > > > >> Well, it's like if I am opening my eyes. I never looked at what the > >> foundation was supposed to do. For a couple of years I've been using > >> gentoo, I never get any pol

Re: [gentoo-user] Daniel Robbins' come back ?

On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:34:47 +0200, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mick wrote: On Saturday 12 January 2008, Jil Larner wrote: Well, it's like if I am opening my eyes. I never looked at what the foundation was supposed to do. For a couple of years I've been using gentoo, I never get any polit

Re: [gentoo-user] Daniel Robbins' come back ?

On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:07:39 -0500 Richard Marzan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Although he works for Microsoft, Daniel is the one who created this > project. He doesn't work for Microsoft any longer. Check Wikipedia or Google for relevant news. Cheers, Renat -- Probleme kann man niemals mit d

Re: [gentoo-user] Daniel Robbins' come back ?

He states on his blog that he currently works for E*Trade, a company specializing in electronic ticker tape services for individuals and corporations. -Hal Renat Golubchyk wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:07:39 -0500 Richard Marzan > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Although he works for Micr

[gentoo-user] TTF Fonts

Hi everyone. I'd like to know if these instructions here http://www.madeinclay.net/?p=8 are still valid for adding ttf fonts to Gentoo. I don't remember what I did last time (more than 1 yr ago), but I don't think it was the same procedure. The article on Gentoo-Wiki seems outdated to me, so I'd ap

Re: [gentoo-user] Daniel Robbins' come back ?

On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 18:22 +0100, Renat Golubchyk wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:07:39 -0500 Richard Marzan > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Although he works for Microsoft, Daniel is the one who created this > > project. > > He doesn't work for Microsoft any longer. Check Wikipedia or Google

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead?

On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:25:55 -0600 Eddie Mihalow Jr wrote: ...[snip]... > You are missing the point of Gentoo then. We are NOT a binary distro > (to repeat ad nauseum). If you want that kind of install, please > change distros. I do find these other methods of install to be > interesting though.

Re: [gentoo-user] Daniel Robbins' come back ?

Alan McKinnon wrote: On Saturday 12 January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Daniel Robbins offers to take back Gentoo leadership. What about it ? Read http://blog.funtoo.org/2008/01/here-my-offer.html I've kept very quiet about Gentoo politics for a long time, but Daniel's blog has promoted me

Re: [gentoo-user] TTF Fonts

I think you could do this right by adding the fonts to fonts:/// (or something like this) Naiani Rosa de Barros wrote: Hi everyone. I'd like to know if these instructions here http://www.madeinclay.net/?p=8 are still valid for adding ttf fonts to Gentoo. I don't remember what I did last time (m

[gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead?

Daniel Pielmeier googlemail.com> writes: > Again i recommend join gentoo-dev and you will see what is going on! Excellent idea. Is there a place where we can conveniently read this list, and not have posting privileges? An archive list server or such? James -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.

[gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ?

· Richard Marzan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Although he works for Microsoft, Check your facts, please. . Michael Schmarck -- printk ("scsi%d : Oh no Mr. Bill!\n", host->host_no); linux-2.6.6/drivers/scsi/53c7xx.c -- gentoo-

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead?

On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:59:52 + (UTC) James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniel Pielmeier googlemail.com> writes: > > > > Again i recommend join gentoo-dev and you will see what is going on! > > Excellent idea. > > Is there a place where we can conveniently read this list, and not > have p

[gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead?

· Galevsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Jan 11, 2008 8:08 PM, Michael Schmarck > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > GRML ? Knoppix ? other LiveCD ? What for, man ? >> >> Oh, quite easy - to install Gentoo. That way, the knowledge of experts >> in creating live CDs is leveraged. NIH is not a good point o

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Is GWN dead?

· Norman Rieß <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Michael Schmarck schrieb: >> · Norman Rieß <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >>> Right, basicly telling people "You have to depend on / use other distros >>> to install our OS, cause we are not able to / don´t have time to provide >>> this" sounds a little fishy. I

[gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead?

· James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Daniel Pielmeier googlemail.com> writes: > > >> Again i recommend join gentoo-dev and you will see what is going on! > > Excellent idea. > > Is there a place where we can conveniently read this list, and not have > posting privileges? > > An archive list server

[gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead?

Michael Schmarck habmalnefrage.de> writes: > Well, actually, I never used a Gentoo install CD to install Gentoo. I > also don't quite understand, why anyone would need such a beast. Folks new to gentoo, would find it suspicious, for a distro not to have it's own install. Other forks of Gen

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead?

On Samstag, 12. Januar 2008, James wrote: > Daniel Pielmeier googlemail.com> writes: > > Again i recommend join gentoo-dev and you will see what is going on! > > Excellent idea. > > Is there a place where we can conveniently read this list, and not have > posting privileges? > > An archive list se

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Relson wrote: > Is it gentoo's goal to make the installation difficult so only a select > group can do the install? Or is the goal to make gentoo a great > distro? In the latter case, why not make the installation easy? The installation isn't

Re: [gentoo-user] Daniel Robbins' come back ?

On Samstag, 12. Januar 2008, Richard Marzan wrote: > On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 07:34 -0600, Dale wrote: > > Mick wrote: > > > On Saturday 12 January 2008, Jil Larner wrote: > > >> Well, it's like if I am opening my eyes. I never looked at what the > > >> foundation was supposed to do. For a couple of y

Re: [gentoo-user] Daniel Robbins' come back ?

On Samstag, 12. Januar 2008, Richard Marzan wrote: > On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 18:22 +0100, Renat Golubchyk wrote: > > On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:07:39 -0500 Richard Marzan > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Although he works for Microsoft, Daniel is the one who created this > > > project. > > > > H

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4 overlay

On Jan 11, 2008 6:37 PM, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 11 January 2008 22:26:34 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Anyone know where this overlay disappeared to? > > It moved to git. Assuming dev-util/git is installed: > > # layman -f && layman -d kde && layman -a kde > > Having

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead?

On Jan 12, 2008 12:52 PM, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Schmarck habmalnefrage.de> writes: > > > > Well, actually, I never used a Gentoo install CD to install Gentoo. I > > also don't quite understand, why anyone would need such a beast. > > Folks new to gentoo, would find it suspicio

[gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ?

Mick gmail.com> writes: > > The problem is, and is not, legal papers. > > Because, IMO, legal papers are the visible part of an Iceberg. Could > > someone tell me what *really* is the crisis ? If people did not do what > > they were supposed to do : what should they have done ? Excellent point

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Is GWN dead?

Michael Schmarck ha scritto: > · Norman Rieß <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Depends. You're saying, that Gentoo might look to be incomplete, if > it were to rely on other distributions (Live CDs). I'm saying, that > it currently already looks to be incomplete, despite there being a > install CD - a CD, wh

[gentoo-user] Gentoo Forums Crashed

Anybody else get a DB error when trying to access the forums? Seems like it may have been overwhelmed with the Robbins debate going on. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ?

James wrote: > Mick gmail.com> writes: > > > >>> The problem is, and is not, legal papers. >>> Because, IMO, legal papers are the visible part of an Iceberg. Could >>> someone tell me what *really* is the crisis ? If people did not do what >>> they were supposed to do : what should they have d

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Forums Crashed

On Sunday 13 January 2008, Richard Cox wrote: > Anybody else get a DB error when trying to access the forums? Seems like > it may have been overwhelmed with the Robbins debate going on. Nope, it seems to work fine from here (UK). There's around 8 pages so far, with some entertaining flaming ami

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Forums Crashed

Richard Cox wrote: > Anybody else get a DB error when trying to access the forums? Seems like it > may have been overwhelmed with the Robbins debate going on. > Works fine here. Even found the thread. Oh, I'm in Mississippi USA if it matters. http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-644321-hig

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Forums Crashed

Everything smooth from here too: Campinas, SP, Brazil :-) On 1/13/08, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Richard Cox wrote: > > Anybody else get a DB error when trying to access the forums? Seems > like it > > may have been overwhelmed with the Robbins debate going on. > > > > Works fine here.

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Forums Crashed

On Saturday 12 January 2008 19:55:23 Dale wrote: > Richard Cox wrote: > > Anybody else get a DB error when trying to access the forums? Seems like > > it may have been overwhelmed with the Robbins debate going on. > > Works fine here. Even found the thread. Oh, I'm in Mississippi USA if > it mat

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Forums Crashed

Richard Cox wrote: > On Saturday 12 January 2008 19:55:23 Dale wrote: > >> Richard Cox wrote: >> >>> Anybody else get a DB error when trying to access the forums? Seems like >>> it may have been overwhelmed with the Robbins debate going on. >>> >> Works fine here. Even found the th

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Forums Crashed

On 1/13/08, Richard Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, it's the "View posts from last 24 hours" link that is causing the > problem for me. > > -- > gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list > > Even though, it's fine here. -- Ricardo Saffi Marques Laboratório de Administração e Segurança d

[gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ?

Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes: > > http://blog.funtoo.org/2008/01/here-my-offer.html > I've kept very quiet about Gentoo politics for a long time, but Daniel's > blog has promoted me to finally open my mouth and express my views. > Daniel is in a tricky position - he is the legal President

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Forums Crashed

On Saturday 12 January 2008 20:05:50 Ricardo Saffi Marques wrote: > On 1/13/08, Richard Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks, it's the "View posts from last 24 hours" link that is causing the > > problem for me. > > > > -- > > gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list > > Even though, it's fin

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Forums Crashed

Weird, but... have you tried cleaning your browser cache? CTRL SHIFT DEL on firefox. On 1/13/08, Richard Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Saturday 12 January 2008 20:05:50 Ricardo Saffi Marques wrote: > > On 1/13/08, Richard Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks, it's the "View posts fr

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Forums Crashed

On Saturday 12 January 2008 20:17:59 Ricardo Saffi Marques wrote: > Weird, but... have you tried cleaning your browser cache? CTRL SHIFT DEL on > firefox. > > On 1/13/08, Richard Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Saturday 12 January 2008 20:05:50 Ricardo Saffi Marques wrote: > > > On 1/13/08, R

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Forums Crashed

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Richard Cox wrote: | Yeah, still have the problem. Very strange. This is because Gentoo is now on Slashdot frntpage: http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/08/01/12/0152208.shtml So, I recon we were slashdotted... - -- Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman BUSCO

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Forums Crashed

On Sonntag, 13. Januar 2008, Richard Cox wrote: > Anybody else get a DB error when trying to access the forums? Seems like > it may have been overwhelmed with the Robbins debate going on. what do you mean with crashed? The 'too many connections' error? That happens sometimes and is not a crash.

[gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ?

Dale bellsouth.net> writes: > >>> The problem is, and is not, legal papers. > > Gentoo needs leadership that is accountable to the user community > > but also bound to a set of bylaws that we agree with. Keeping the > > distro free is paramount, but, creating avenues for financial success > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ?

James wrote: In my mind I'm an accomplished person. In her mind I'm just another stupid EE, Hey James - Interesting post - this eludes me tho, what is an EE? Cheers Mark P.s: a beer should cure all women problems -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list