Hello Bertram Scharpf,
> there's just another kernel option I want to activate but
> cannot find it:
While in make menuconfig, press / and you'll be able to search for any
kernel option, including hidden ones. The output tells you which
other options are needed to make it available.
--
Neil Bo
On Sunday 23 September 2007, Mrugesh Karnik wrote:
> From man bash:
>
> ``When bash is invoked as an interactive login shell, or as a
> non-interactive shell with the --login option, it first reads and
> executes commands from the file /etc/profile, if that file exists.
> After reading tha
Hi,
Am Samstag, 22. Sep 2007, 22:45:48 -0500 schrieb Tim:
> Bertram Scharpf wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > there's just another kernel option I want to activate but
> > cannot find it:
> >
> > Symbol: ROOT_NFS [=n]
> > Prompt: Root file system on NFS
> > Depends on: NET && NFS_FS=y && IP_PN
Am Sonntag, 23. September 2007 schrieb Bertram Scharpf:
> I wrote:
> > > So all prerequisites seem to meet. What is still missing?
>
> Yes, I have a kernel with TCP/IP activated.
> NET && NFS_FS=y && IP_PNP all meet.
>
> ROOT_NFS still doesn't show up. What else could miss?
Can you post your .con
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 04:58:45PM -0400, John Blinka wrote:
> And I guess you are using nfs3?
>
> I really don't know. Where would I look to determine whether I'm using 3 or
> 4?
If you don't know, then you are certainly running nfs3. nfs4 uses 'nfs4'
as fs_type in fstab, as opposed to nfs3 whi
Hi,
Am Sonntag, 23. Sep 2007, 11:32:33 +0200 schrieb Dirk Heinrichs:
> Am Sonntag, 23. September 2007 schrieb Bertram Scharpf:
>
> > I wrote:
> > > > So all prerequisites seem to meet. What is still missing?
> >
> > Yes, I have a kernel with TCP/IP activated.
> > NET && NFS_FS=y && IP_PNP all mee
Am Sonntag, 23. September 2007 schrieb Bertram Scharpf:
> Hi,
>
> Am Sonntag, 23. Sep 2007, 11:32:33 +0200 schrieb Dirk Heinrichs:
> > Am Sonntag, 23. September 2007 schrieb Bertram Scharpf:
> > > I wrote:
> > > > > So all prerequisites seem to meet. What is still missing?
> > >
> > > Yes, I have a
Hi,
Am Sonntag, 23. Sep 2007, 13:19:17 +0200 schrieb Dirk Heinrichs:
> Am Sonntag, 23. September 2007 schrieb Bertram Scharpf:
> > Am Sonntag, 23. Sep 2007, 11:32:33 +0200 schrieb Dirk Heinrichs:
> > > Am Sonntag, 23. September 2007 schrieb Bertram Scharpf:
> > > > I wrote:
> > > > > > So all prer
On Sonntag, 23. September 2007, David Relson wrote:
> Now that my old AthlonXP mobo has been replaced by an AMD 64 X2 mobo,
> it's time for upgrading CHOST :->
>
> According to http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/change-chost.xml after a
> couple of changes to /etc/make.conf, i.e.
>
> from:
>USE
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:15:50 -0500
"Marzan, Richard non Unisys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I disable portage dropping or overriding my MAKEOPTS variable
> setting when building certain programs?
>
>
MAKEOPTS="jXXX -e"
>From "man make":
-e, --environment-overrides
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 08:24:42AM -0400, John Blinka wrote:
> >
> > Try `/etc/init.d/nfs --debug start`, that ought to give us some output
> > to work on.
>
> The output is rather long - 1830 lines, so it's in the attached file.
Ok, there are some funny things in there. Please also post the outp
Today I rebooted one of my servers and now slapd won't start (it's been
running OK until this reboot). The is what the slapd.log says:
---8<-
Sep 23 16:31:07 polar slapd[8763]: @(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.3.35 (Sep 23 2007
16:28:27) $
[EMAIL
PROTECTED]:/
On Sep 23, 2007, at 5:47 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Sonntag, 23. September 2007, David Relson wrote:
Now that my old AthlonXP mobo has been replaced by an AMD 64 X2 mobo,
it's time for upgrading CHOST :->
According to http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/change-chost.xml after a
couple of chan
On Sep 22, 2007, at 5:13 PM, David Relson wrote:
Now that my old AthlonXP mobo has been replaced by an AMD 64 X2 mobo,
it's time for upgrading CHOST :->
According to http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/change-chost.xml after a
couple of changes to /etc/make.conf, i.e.
from:
USE="x86 ..."
> boot from cd
Don't want to start a flame war here, but why should he use reiserfs ??? I
think he can use whatever filesystem he wishes to ...
> mkfs.reiserfs
> start stage3 installation.
brgds, Marc
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> Ok, there are some funny things in there. Please also post the output of
> the following commands.
>
> -> find /var/lib/init.d/ -name nfs | xargs ls -lh
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Sep 21 13:20 /var/lib/init.d/failed/nfs ->
/etc/init.d/nfs
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Sep 21 13:16 /var/lib/init.d/soft
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 03:37:36PM -0400, John Blinka wrote:
> -> ls -lA /var/lib/init.d/
[snip]
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Sep 21 13:16 softscripts.old
That shouldn't be there. Normally, that directory is created and later
removed by /sbin/rc - which is run numerous times at boot. So this se
On Sonntag, 23. September 2007, Marc Redmann wrote:
> > boot from cd
>
> Don't want to start a flame war here, but why should he use reiserfs ???
it was an example. And I am free to choose any fs I want for that. Exept jfs.
Besides reiserfs is a good fs, so no harm done.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ma
Hi, folks
Is there any problem to share portage tree over nfs between different
archs?
In this particular case I want to use a machine with arc=amd64
as a nfs server and share its tree with several x86 machines.
--
Best regards,
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
I'm getting close to buying the parts for my new machine (see earlier msgs)
& an Intel quad-core mentioned by a helpful responder
has now come down almost within my price range.
The CPU I have been contemplating for some weeks is
an 'Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 4 MB 65 nm 2,67 GHz', which sells for CAD
John Blinka writes:
> Not a stupid question - I've been known to overlook the obvious. But
> I've been running the same kernel for quite some time, and nfs has worked
> before on that kernel. However, on tobey:
I had a similar problem recently after an update. Some of the shares did
still work
On 9/22/07, David Relson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now that my old AthlonXP mobo has been replaced by an AMD 64 X2 mobo,
> it's time for upgrading CHOST :->
>
> According to http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/change-chost.xml after a
> couple of changes to /etc/make.conf, i.e.
>
> from:
>U
On 9/23/07, Daniel Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, folks
>
>
> Is there any problem to share portage tree over nfs between different
> archs?
> In this particular case I want to use a machine with arc=amd64
> as a nfs server and share its tree with several x86 machines.
>
>
> --
> Best reg
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:16:03 -0400
Mark Shields wrote:
...[snip]...
> Besides what everyone else has already suggested, I would suggest
> backing up everything beforehand, or you can continue using your
> 32-bit environment with your shiny new 64-bit processor, but you will
> not be able to use a
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:12:35 -0400
"John Blinka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > that should be /etc/init.d/nfsmount start. /etc/init.d/nfs is for
> > nfs server.
>
>
> I''m confused by your answer, because tobey is the server, and
> /etc/init.d/nfs
> fails on tobey. Perhaps I don't und
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:53:11 +0200
Volker Armin Hemmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sonntag, 23. September 2007, Marc Redmann wrote:
> > > boot from cd
> >
> > Don't want to start a flame war here, but why should he use
> > reiserfs ???
>
> it was an example. And I am free to choose any fs I
It was a PEBKAC error. I built the new kernel but forgot to make it
the default at bootup. They say that memory is the second thing to go,
I forget what the first is.
Anyhow I had ALSA 1.0.13 in the kernel, with 1.0.14 alsa-lib and
alsa-utils. That obviously doesn't work. OK, so I've now s
On 24 September 2007, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> Hi, folks
>
>
> Is there any problem to share portage tree over nfs between different
> archs?
> In this particular case I want to use a machine with arc=amd64
> as a nfs server and share its tree with several x86 machines.
That's fine.
Uwe
--
Jack Ni
On Monday, 24. September 2007, Philip Webb wrote:
> I'm getting close to buying the parts for my new machine (see earlier msgs)
> & an Intel quad-core mentioned by a helpful responder
> has now come down almost within my price range.
> The CPU I have been contemplating for some weeks is
> an 'Intel
29 matches
Mail list logo
