On Wednesday 23 May 2007, Dan Farrell wrote:
> I know this is a long shot, and not many people run diskless hosts.
> I have one with kind of a loud fan that uses a lot of energy - it's a
> pentium 4 in a slimline case and it runs pretty hot, so I can't
> adjust the fan speed based on temperature,
Am Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2007 18:08 schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
> Have you tried booting (with the device plugged in) into single user
> mode, then trying to convince the system to use the built in screen as
> the default device (fn-f7 on my machine), and finally exiting the
> single user shell to go multi
Are these any options in the kernel and in the gcc to optimize for
Intel's Core 2 Duo chips? When I set up my gentoo box for the Pentium
Processor Extreme Edition (dual core prescott), I just used
-march=prescott in make.conf
Which -march flag would be the most relevant gcc optimization for
Inte
On 5/24/07, Denis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are these any options in the kernel and in the gcc to optimize for
Intel's Core 2 Duo chips? When I set up my gentoo box for the Pentium
Processor Extreme Edition (dual core prescott), I just used
-march=prescott in make.conf
Which -march flag would
On 5/24/07, Denis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are these any options in the kernel and in the gcc to optimize for
Intel's Core 2 Duo chips? When I set up my gentoo box for the Pentium
Processor Extreme Edition (dual core prescott), I just used
-march=prescott in make.conf
Which -march flag would
After reading some docs, the impression I get is that the 'nocona'
flag is for building a 64-bit system... For a 32-bit system, it seems
like 'prescott' would be the choice, wouldn't it?
This from the GCC website about 4.2.0 release changes:
IA-32/x86-64
* -mtune=generic can now be used to
Denis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are these any options in the kernel and in the gcc to optimize for
> Intel's Core 2 Duo chips?
In the kernel: Yes. At least in 2.6.21.
> And is there explicit support in the latest gentoo kernel for Core 2
> Duo, or does it go under Pentium 4 family?
I'd say,
On Thu, 24 May 2007 11:13:30 -0400, Denis wrote:
> After reading some docs, the impression I get is that the 'nocona'
> flag is for building a 64-bit system... For a 32-bit system, it seems
> like 'prescott' would be the choice, wouldn't it?
Yes.
> We don't have gcc-4.2.0 in our portage availa
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When the devs consider it suitable for at least the testing branch or
> when you do "echo =sys-devel/gcc-4.2*" >>/etc/portage/package.mask,
> whichever comes sooner.
Even that will not work (yet) as gcc-4.2 is not actually masked it is
not keyworded.
--
On 5/24/07, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bear in mind that GCC is almost certainly masked for good reason. It's
not like you're using a binary distro and only need a compiler for a few
packages. Feel free to try it in the knowledge that if it breaks your
system, you get to keep the pi
Whenever I try to Open/Save in GNOME, it pulls up a dialog box that
lists hidden files as well as visible files. Those hidden files are
hidden for a reason, the reason being that I did not consciously create
them, so I should not have to wade through them in order to get to my
files. How can I di
On Thu, 24 May 2007 12:22:46 -0500, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> Whenever I try to Open/Save in GNOME, it pulls up a dialog box that
> lists hidden files as well as visible files. Those hidden files are
> hidden for a reason, the reason being that I did not consciously create
> them, so I should not
hi folks !
My gentoo desktop needed to be reinstaled this week, and i did it :)
well, all compiled, without a single error, kernel 2.6.20-r8 installed, ok.
when i start my kde, it hangs, showing only the X window with mouse cursor,
when i return to the terminal, i got some messages refering to the
On Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2007, Thiago Lüttig wrote:
> hi folks !
> My gentoo desktop needed to be reinstaled this week, and i did it :)
> well, all compiled, without a single error, kernel 2.6.20-r8 installed, ok.
> when i start my kde, it hangs, showing only the X window with mouse cursor,
> when i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thiago,
Thiago Lüttig wrote:
> saying, it cannot contact DCop Server or connect to the X server. I
Could you please post the messages the console printed? Have you tried to
startx as another
user? As root? Could you please attach /var/log/Xor
On Wed, 23 May 2007 22:05:14 +0200
Hans-Werner Hilse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2007 11:59:23 -0500
> Dan Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I know swapon doesn't work on regular files, so to add my swap I
> > need to first use losetup to set up /dev/loop0 as my sw
I have a core 2 duo (dell 6400), which is currently running x86.
I am thinking of setting up another partition and dual booting amd64.
My question concerns sharing some directories between the two
(naturally only one is active at a time).
In particular can I share
* distfiles (DISTDIR)
* logs
On Wed, 23 May 2007 20:56:30 +0200
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, for what it's worth,
> Your entire post seems half-assed, and I think you need to think it
> through carefully:
>
> 1. What are you *actually* trying to do? Seems like the fan is loud,
> so a) replace the fan with
On 5/24/07, Allan Gottlieb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a core 2 duo (dell 6400), which is currently running x86.
I am thinking of setting up another partition and dual booting amd64.
My question concerns sharing some directories between the two
(naturally only one is active at a time).
I
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 06:14:53PM -0700, maxim wexler wrote
> Hi group,
>
> I connect to the web using
>
> $sudo /usr/sbin/pon
>
> on one machine(2.6.20-gentoo-r6). On another
> machine(2.6.19-gentoo-r5), I get
>
> :sudo: can't open /etc/sudoers: Permission denied.
Is "picky" a member of
This is the first time ever that I ended up with an unbootable kernel
after a new install, and I have no idea where to start. This is a
fresh install of Gentoo 2007.0 minimal CD stage 3, using the x86 quick
install guide.
Here's the error I get at boot while the kernel is loading its device driv
On Freitag, 25. Mai 2007, Denis wrote:
> This is the first time ever that I ended up with an unbootable kernel
> after a new install, and I have no idea where to start. This is a
> fresh install of Gentoo 2007.0 minimal CD stage 3, using the x86 quick
> install guide.
>
> Here's the error I get at
On Thu, 24 May 2007 17:51:09 -0400, Mark Shields wrote:
> You can probably share all of them, but just realize the distfiles for
> x86 won't be usable for amd64 and vice-versa (unless you're going to
> use an x86 distfile on the amd64 because there isn't an amd64 version
> available).
Of course
like copying the relevant parts of dmesg for us to see?
maybe it is a missing sata-driver, missing scsi-disk support?
I wanted to attach a dmesg output but I don't know how where I can
extract it. It's a fresh install, and the only way I can boot right
now is with the Gentoo CD... The file sy
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> I have a core 2 duo (dell 6400), which is currently running x86.
> I am thinking of setting up another partition and dual booting amd64.
I assume you've checked whether it is 64-bit compatible. Not all Core 2
Duo's in 6400's are. I have a T2400 processor in my 6400 which
What make and model motherboard?
Did you set the clock with date?
Did you cp your zone information?
--
Powered by Gentoo/Linux
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
I have an Intel D975XBX2 motherboard with an Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
processor. One Seagate SATA drive. An IDE CD-RW. Pretty much all
the controllers on the board are Intel.
I did re-set the clock, after which the make stopped complaining.
One concern I have - when I configure the kernel, I fa
Hi all!
I have a problem with symbol 'vertical-line' (now i'm in fluxbox session,and
cannot insert it :))
In gnome or plain console (tty1..6) all works fine, keyboard works without any
problem, but in XFCE and Fluxbox i have a problem.. in quake3 keys a,w,s,d not
working... vertical line not ins
On 5/24/07, Denis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have an Intel D975XBX2 motherboard with an Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
processor. One Seagate SATA drive. An IDE CD-RW. Pretty much all
the controllers on the board are Intel.
I did re-set the clock, after which the make stopped complaining.
One conc
On Freitag, 25. Mai 2007, Denis wrote:
> I have an Intel D975XBX2 motherboard with an Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
> processor. One Seagate SATA drive. An IDE CD-RW. Pretty much all
> the controllers on the board are Intel.
>
> I did re-set the clock, after which the make stopped complaining.
>
> One
Device Drivers:
Serial ATA (prod) and Parallel ATA (experimental) drivers --->
one below scsi, two below ide.
Yes, I combed through that and set all the necessary options there
before, so I doubt this is the problem...
I've just reconfigured the kernel and recompiled it on another fresh
inst
On 5/24/07, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 17:51:09 -0400, Mark Shields wrote:
> You can probably share all of them, but just realize the distfiles for
> x86 won't be usable for amd64 and vice-versa (unless you're going to
> use an x86 distfile on the amd64 because
SOLVED.
I was able to configure and compile the kernel and configure a working
Gentoo system that gives me no errors at boot :-)
I am not sure what went wrong the first time. I selected the same
basic driver support within the kernel as the first time, except I
didn't bother with some of the ot
> Is "picky" a member of both "users" and "wheel"?
Yes
> Does picky's machine
> run PAM? PAM has additional config files to control
Yes, and /etc/pam.d/sudo is identical on both machines
Also permissions under /usr/bin/sudo are identical on
both machines: ---s--x--x. As are all other bin an
Denis wrote:
> SOLVED.
>
> I was able to configure and compile the kernel and configure a working
> Gentoo system that gives me no errors at boot :-)
>
> I am not sure what went wrong the first time. I selected the same
> basic driver support within the kernel as the first time, except I
> didn't
Denis wrote:
>> I have ran into things like this before, I usually run make mrproper
>> from within the kernel directory to make sure there is no old cruft
>> laying around in there.
>
> In my case, it was a fresh install, which made it quite a bit more
> painful to fix because I had to go through
I have ran into things like this before, I usually run make mrproper
from within the kernel directory to make sure there is no old cruft
laying around in there.
In my case, it was a fresh install, which made it quite a bit more
painful to fix because I had to go through the procedures twice and
Hi. I am having difficulty configuring ppp to use pppoe. A kernel
module pppoe and pppox are loaded, but I get the following error from
pppd:
/usr/sbin/pppd unknown option "eth2"
Now eth2 is what I have in the
link_ppp0 line in the /etc/conf.d/net
Any assistance would be appreciated.
Here is
Will Briggs wrote:
> Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> > I have a core 2 duo (dell 6400), which is currently running x86.
> > I am thinking of setting up another partition and dual booting amd64.
>
> Not all Core 2
> Duo's in 6400's are. I have a T2400 processor in my 6400 which is not
> em64t enabled
At Fri, 25 May 2007 07:28:31 +0200 Roman Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will Briggs wrote:
>> Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>> > I have a core 2 duo (dell 6400), which is currently running x86.
>> > I am thinking of setting up another partition and dual booting amd64.
>>
>> Not all Core 2
>
40 matches
Mail list logo
