On Tue, Sep 17 2013, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 21:23:50 -0400, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
>
>> >> So I reinstalled cups but /etc/cups/cupd.conf was not changed and
>> >> still has its old date and contents. The merge looks clean (output
>> >> below)
>> >
>> > /etc/ is CONFIG_PROTE
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 21:23:50 -0400, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
> >> So I reinstalled cups but /etc/cups/cupd.conf was not changed and
> >> still has its old date and contents. The merge looks clean (output
> >> below)
> >
> > /etc/ is CONFIG_PROTECTed.
>
> This part I knew, but would have expec
On Mon, Sep 16 2013, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:28:05 -0400, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
>
>> So I reinstalled cups but /etc/cups/cupd.conf was not changed and still
>> has its old date and contents. The merge looks clean (output below)
>
> /etc/ is CONFIG_PROTECTed.
This part I k
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:28:05 -0400, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
> So I reinstalled cups but /etc/cups/cupd.conf was not changed and still
> has its old date and contents. The merge looks clean (output below)
/etc/ is CONFIG_PROTECTed. Also, portage knows if you are reinstalling
the same version of t
4 matches
Mail list logo
