Oscar Carlsson wrote:
>ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" != ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~86"
>
>Can you see the difference? :-)
>It's supposed to be "~x86".
>
>Oscar
>
>
>
Yup, but this wasn't a copy/paste, and the mistake is in the mail, not
the file ;-)
I don't think portage would have let me do such a dumb mistake
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" != ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~86"
Can you see the difference? :-)
It's supposed to be "~x86".
Oscar
> Anyway, I re-tried it with only "~86" and the same error
> shows up.
pgpjrNMfuH853.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Mike Williams wrote:
>On Thursday 02 June 2005 17:49, Maxime Robert-Schreyers wrote:
>
>
>>configure:6491: checking compiler and flags for sanity
>>configure:6510: i386-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -o conftest -O2 -mcpu=i686
>>-fomit-frame-pointer -DWITH_LDAP_PUBKEY -Wall -Wpointer-arith
>>-Wno-uninitialize
On Thursday 02 June 2005 17:49, Maxime Robert-Schreyers wrote:
> configure:6491: checking compiler and flags for sanity
> configure:6510: i386-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -o conftest -O2 -mcpu=i686
> -fomit-frame-pointer -DWITH_LDAP_PUBKEY -Wall -Wpointer-arith
> -Wno-uninitialized -lldap conftest.c >&5 c
Jan Callewaert wrote:
>On 6/2/05, Maxime Robert-Schreyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>[...snip]
>>I've changed my /etc/make.conf , adding ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86" .
>>
>>
>
>If you wish to use the unstable branch of gentoo, you should just set
>ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86".
>
>
>
It was t
On 6/2/05, Maxime Robert-Schreyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm new to this list, so if I inadvertently break some rules, feel free
> to tell me so.
>
> I've been happily running gentoo for a bit more than a year, and have
> just encountered
> my first real problem (gentoo i
6 matches
Mail list logo
