Re: [gentoo-user] march in /etc/make.conf

2006-07-21 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Janusz Bossy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > There is no problem with that. Yesterday i did an emerge -C xorg-x11 > while xorg was running, then compiled xorg-x11 again and restarted the > X server. All is working fine, except I couldn't start the > applications that were built against X when

Re: [gentoo-user] march in /etc/make.conf

2006-07-21 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > Well, depends on how you define "open files are overwritten". On > Linux, it is like you say. But on Windows and HP-UX, you CANNOT > replace a file, if it's still opened somewhere. Eg. you cannot > replace /bin/sh. Instead, a new file will be cre

Re: [gentoo-user] march in /etc/make.conf

2006-07-06 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 11:26:55 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > Generally speaking, yes, you can. Your system will be slower, > but that's of course to be expected, as it is busy. Setting PORTAGE_NICENESS in make.conf will help here, but there'll still be some slowdown. -- Neil Bothwick I am Loc

Re: [gentoo-user] march in /etc/make.conf

2006-07-06 Thread Alexander Skwar
Uwe Thiem wrote: > On 06 July 2006 10:27, Alexander Skwar wrote: >> Dirk Heinrichs wrote: >> > Yes. Open files are not overwritten, >> >> Uh? Open files *ARE* overwritten! That's Linux, not Windows or HP-UX! > > No, open files are not overwritten. The new file with the same name (and path > of co

Re: [gentoo-user] march in /etc/make.conf

2006-07-06 Thread Uwe Thiem
On 06 July 2006 10:27, Alexander Skwar wrote: > Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > > Yes. Open files are not overwritten, > > Uh? Open files *ARE* overwritten! That's Linux, not Windows or HP-UX! No, open files are not overwritten. The new file with the same name (and path of course) is written to disk, tru

Re: [gentoo-user] march in /etc/make.conf

2006-07-06 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Donnerstag, 6. Juli 2006 11:27 schrieb ext Alexander Skwar: > Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > > Yes. Open files are not overwritten, > > Uh? Open files *ARE* overwritten! That's Linux, not Windows or HP-UX! Hmm, how does it work, then? Because the old version ist still in memory? Bye... Dirk

Re: [gentoo-user] march in /etc/make.conf

2006-07-06 Thread Alexander Skwar
Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > Yes. Open files are not overwritten, Uh? Open files *ARE* overwritten! That's Linux, not Windows or HP-UX! Alexander Skwar -- The more laws and order are made prominent, the more thieves and robbers there will be. -- Lao Tsu -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mai

Re: [gentoo-user] march in /etc/make.conf

2006-07-06 Thread Alexander Skwar
Pawel K wrote: > Hello > > I've changed -march from pentrium4 to pentium3 and > wanted to recompile everything. What does this have to do with the "iptables wiki"? IOW: Please do *NOT* capture threads! Do *NOT* reply to a message and change the subject, when you want to start a new thread! Thanks

Re: [gentoo-user] march in /etc/make.conf

2006-07-06 Thread Janusz Bossy
On 7/6/06, Pawel K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1) How can I recompile all of them ? I don't want to download new packages, I just want to recompile existing ones. emerge -e 2) Can I work on that machine during recompilation. I mean what happens with binaries that are currently executed and nee

Re: [gentoo-user] march in /etc/make.conf

2006-07-06 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Donnerstag, 6. Juli 2006 10:22 schrieb ext Pawel K: First, please don't start a new thread by replying to an existing one (aka "Thread hijacking"). Thanks. > I've changed -march from pentrium4 to pentium3 and > wanted to recompile everything. I've used the > following command to do that: > >