Re: [gentoo-user] libicui18n.so.49 troubles

2012-05-14 Thread Nilesh Govindrajan
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 05/13/2012 06:05 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Sun, 13 May 2012 20:58:51 +0530, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: >> >>> I had to mask icu-49 because some packages failed to compile >>> dur

Re: [gentoo-user] libicui18n.so.49 troubles

2012-05-13 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/13/2012 06:05 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 13 May 2012 20:58:51 +0530, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: > >> I had to mask icu-49 because some packages failed to compile >> during a world update. > > Same here, but the problems seem fixed now

Re: [gentoo-user] libicui18n.so.49 troubles

2012-05-13 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
Am Sonntag, 13. Mai 2012, 20:58:51 schrieb Nilesh Govindrajan: > Hi, > > I had to mask icu-49 because some packages failed to compile during a > world update. I reverted back to 4.8, but now certain applications > complain about .49 missing. revdep-rebuild isn't able to detect > breakages and neit

Re: [gentoo-user] libicui18n.so.49 troubles

2012-05-13 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 13 May 2012 20:58:51 +0530, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: > I had to mask icu-49 because some packages failed to compile during a > world update. Same here, but the problems seem fixed now and I unmasked 49-r1 a week or so ago. -- Neil Bothwick Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talen