Philip Webb schreef:
> I'm using Gkrellm2, which has its own internal sensors. Yes, Gkrellm1
> used to rely on Lm_sensors, but that's obsolete.
This does not seem to be completely the case, based on my (currently
ongoing) experience.
Prior to rebooting to my new kernel, I was able to use all of
050901 Philip Webb wrote:
> 050902 Holly Bostick wrote:
>> Philip Webb schreef:
>>> I've installed kernel 2.6.12-gentoo-r9 & Gkrellm doesn't show sensors.
>>> There's no problem with 2.6.9-gentoo-r1 .
>> I am also using GKrellm2, and while I didn't know it had its own sensors,
>> they work fine : t
050902 Holly Bostick wrote:
> Philip Webb schreef:
>> I've installed kernel 2.6.12-gentoo-r9 & Gkrellm doesn't show sensors.
>> There's no problem with 2.6.9-gentoo-r1 .
> I am also using GKrellm2, and while I didn't know it had its own sensors,
> they work fine : temperature, fan, thermal, hdd, an
Philip Webb schreef:
>
>> Philip Webb schreef:
>>
>>> I've installed kernel 2.6.12-gentoo-r9 & find Gkrellm doesn't
>>> show sensors. There's no problem with 2.6.9-gentoo-r1 . The same
>>> modules are being installed & removed at each (re)boot. There is
>>> a recent thread on the forum which repo
050901 Holly Bostick wrote:
> Philip Webb schreef:
>> I've installed kernel 2.6.12-gentoo-r9 & find Gkrellm doesn't show
>> sensors. There's no problem with 2.6.9-gentoo-r1 . The same modules
>> are being installed & removed at each (re)boot.
>> There is a recent thread on the forum which reported
Peter Ruskin schreef:
> On Friday 02 September 2005 00:21, Holly Bostick wrote:
>
>> Peter, why does running this command give me the following output:
>>
>> emerge -v $(equery b /lib/modules | sed -e 's:^:>=:' ) !!! No
>> command or unknown command given
>>
Peter Ruskin schreef:
> On Thursday 01 September 2005 20:37, Andrew MacKenzie wrote:
>> I don't mean to thread-hijack, but...
>>
>> I was just thinking that it would be really nice if after I run
>> "genkernel" I got a list of packages that need to be recompiled
>> against the new kernel (i.e. n
On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 21:48:50 +0200, Holly Bostick wrote:
> Or... since you know (sometimes) which of such packages need to be
> re-emerged, and you also know when you have upgraded your kernel, you
> *could* just write a (one line) script to re-emerge the relevant
> packages, throw it in /usr/sbin
Andrew MacKenzie schreef:
> +++ Holly Bostick [gentoo-user] [Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 07:03:47PM
> +0200]:
>
>> If lm_sensors the package compiles against the kernel, as I would
>> imagine it must, it would need to be re-emerged when you upgraded
>> the kernel.
>
> I don't mean to thread-hijack, b
+++ Holly Bostick [gentoo-user] [Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 07:03:47PM +0200]:
> If lm_sensors the package compiles against the kernel, as I would
> imagine it must, it would need to be re-emerged when you upgraded the
> kernel.
I don't mean to thread-hijack, but...
I was just thinking that it would be
Philip Webb schreef:
> I've installed kernel 2.6.12-gentoo-r9 & find Gkrellm doesn't show
> sensors. There's no problem with 2.6.9-gentoo-r1 . The same modules
> are being installed & removed at each (re)boot.
>
> There is a recent thread on the forum which reported that removing
> ACPI from the k
11 matches
Mail list logo
