Am 07.11.2014 um 19:19 schrieb Mark Pariente:
>
>
> Going to 4.9 though is another thing. Apparently they broke the ABI
> for the standard C++ library, so once you start compiling C++ stuff
> with 4.9 you better go all in (I did @system @world with 4.9 and had
> very few things that failed to compi
Am 07.11.2014 um 19:19 schrieb Mark Pariente:
> Going to 4.9 though is another thing. Apparently they broke the ABI for
> the standard C++ library, so once you start compiling C++ stuff with 4.9
> you better go all in (I did @system @world with 4.9 and had very few
> things that failed to compile[
* James [141107 12:47]:
> Ok
>
> so I'm still on 4.7.3; but if I set 4.8.3
> as the default, should I rebuild @system ?
>
> # gcc-config -l
> [1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.7.3 *
> [2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.8.3
>
>
> I saw the news item about 4.8.3-SSP, which I think is a good idea, but
> how
so I'm still on 4.7.3; but if I set 4.8.3
as the default, should I rebuild @system ?
# gcc-config -l
[1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.7.3 *
[2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.8.3
I saw the news item about 4.8.3-SSP, which I think is a good idea, but
how deeply, if at all, do I need to rebuild packages ?
Is
4 matches
Mail list logo