Re: [gentoo-user] depclean missing packages

2017-01-05 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 21:32:50 +0100 Arve Barsnes wrote: > On 4 January 2017 at 21:25, Daniel Frey wrote: > > > I always do `emerge -uDN world`. Which is --update --deep > > --newuse... I've just never had that happen with depclean before. > > Odd, no? > > > > I usually do: > > > > `emerge -uDN wo

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean missing packages

2017-01-05 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 05/01/2017 06:46, Dale wrote: >> Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> On 04/01/2017 22:25, Daniel Frey wrote: On 01/04/2017 08:30 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 18:11:10 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >>> Using the --deep switch can / does pull in a lot

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean missing packages

2017-01-04 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 05/01/2017 06:46, Dale wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: >> On 04/01/2017 22:25, Daniel Frey wrote: >>> On 01/04/2017 08:30 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 18:11:10 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> Using the --deep switch can / does pull in a lot of seemingly extra >> pac

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean missing packages

2017-01-04 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 04/01/2017 22:25, Daniel Frey wrote: >> On 01/04/2017 08:30 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: >>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 18:11:10 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> > Using the --deep switch can / does pull in a lot of seemingly extra > packages. --deep is practically *requ

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean missing packages

2017-01-04 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 04/01/2017 22:32, Arve Barsnes wrote: > On 4 January 2017 at 21:25, Daniel Frey > wrote: > > I always do `emerge -uDN world`. Which is --update --deep --newuse... > I've just never had that happen with depclean before. Odd, no? > > I usually do: > >

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean missing packages

2017-01-04 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 04/01/2017 22:25, Daniel Frey wrote: > On 01/04/2017 08:30 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 18:11:10 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> Using the --deep switch can / does pull in a lot of seemingly extra packages. >>> >>> --deep is practically *required* to do a full proper

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean missing packages

2017-01-04 Thread Arve Barsnes
On 4 January 2017 at 21:25, Daniel Frey wrote: > I always do `emerge -uDN world`. Which is --update --deep --newuse... > I've just never had that happen with depclean before. Odd, no? > > I usually do: > > `emerge -uDN world` > > and > > `emerge -ac` to depclean afterwards. > > As I use --deep al

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean missing packages

2017-01-04 Thread Daniel Frey
On 01/04/2017 08:30 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 18:11:10 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >>> Using the --deep switch can / does pull in a lot of seemingly extra >>> packages. >> >> --deep is practically *required* to do a full proper update. >> >> Say A is in world, and A depends

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean missing packages

2017-01-04 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 18:11:10 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Using the --deep switch can / does pull in a lot of seemingly extra > > packages. > > --deep is practically *required* to do a full proper update. > > Say A is in world, and A depends on B which depends on C. > C is updated in the tre

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean missing packages

2017-01-04 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 04/01/2017 18:06, Corbin Bird wrote: > > On 01/03/2017 02:42 PM, Daniel Frey wrote: >> So, for the first time I've seen the following message after an `emerge >> -uDN world`: >> >> >> # emerge -cp >> >> * Always study the list of packages to be cleaned for any obvious >> * mistakes. Packages

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean missing packages

2017-01-04 Thread Corbin Bird
On 01/03/2017 02:42 PM, Daniel Frey wrote: > So, for the first time I've seen the following message after an `emerge > -uDN world`: > > > # emerge -cp > > * Always study the list of packages to be cleaned for any obvious > * mistakes. Packages that are part of the world set will always > * be k

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean missing packages

2017-01-03 Thread Arve Barsnes
On 3 January 2017 at 21:42, Daniel Frey wrote: > What I don't understand is I've been updating and depcleaning for more > than a decade and haven't seen that message before. Am I just lucky? > Yes. I've seen this many times. Arve