El Sat, 2 Sep 2006 19:30:23 -0700
Richard Fish dijo:
> On 9/2/06, Arnau Bria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not so familiar with that... I supposed it was "stable"...
>
> Well, don't feel bad about that. Seems like quite a few bugs being
> filed today about stable packages not building with
On 9/2/06, Arnau Bria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not so familiar with that... I supposed it was "stable"...
Well, don't feel bad about that. Seems like quite a few bugs being
filed today about stable packages not building with gcc-4.1, while the
~arch versions do.
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@
El Sat, 2 Sep 2006 14:03:14 -0700
Richard Fish dijo:
> On 9/2/06, Arnau Bria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've been looking fot this in gentoo forums and in google but I found
> > nothuing...
>
> Did you try searching bugzilla?
Nop...
I'm not so familiar with that... I supposed it was "stable
On 9/2/06, Arnau Bria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been looking fot this in gentoo forums and in google but I found
nothuing...
Did you try searching bugzilla?
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126968
And then from /usr/portage/net-mail/cyrus-imap-admin/ChangeLog:
*cyrus-imap-admin-
4 matches
Mail list logo