Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Dale wrote:
>> Nope. I didn't notice he was trying to use 3.2 until after I hit send.
>> Bad thing about emails, you can't delete them after they are sent. :/
> In the good old days you could compose offline, and not send them
> until the nex
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Dale wrote:
> Nope. I didn't notice he was trying to use 3.2 until after I hit send.
> Bad thing about emails, you can't delete them after they are sent. :/
In the good old days you could compose offline, and not send them
until the next time you dialed up, so yo
Alex Schuster wrote:
> Dale writes:
>
>> Alex Schuster wrote:
>>> Mark Knecht writes:
>>>
Check out the very nice 'lsdrv' script by Phil Turmel. Run it, save a
copy of the output for bad times.
https://github.com/pturmel/lsdrv
>>> That doesn't work here, and I do not understand
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 19:43:50 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
> BTW, sys-fs/udev-187 does not have the 'udevinfo' command, it seems to
> be 'udevadm info' now.
udevinfo disappeared a long time ago. I wrote a script called udevinfo to
call mdadm info so that I didn't need thchage my setup, it is dated
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 12:59:19 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> You can get the ATTRS{serial} (i.e. serial number).
Not all drives supply this. I have a pair of Seagate drives and a pair of
WD drives. Neither drive is distinguishable from its twin with udev
attributes.
--
Neil Bothwick
If nothing s
Mark Knecht writes:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Alex Schuster
> wrote:
> > Mark Knecht writes:
> >
> >> Check out the very nice 'lsdrv' script by Phil Turmel. Run it, save a
> >> copy of the output for bad times.
> >>
> >> https://github.com/pturmel/lsdrv
> >
> > That doesn't work here, and
Dale writes:
> Alex Schuster wrote:
> > Mark Knecht writes:
> >
> >> Check out the very nice 'lsdrv' script by Phil Turmel. Run it, save a
> >> copy of the output for bad times.
> >>
> >> https://github.com/pturmel/lsdrv
> > That doesn't work here, and I do not understand why. In line 305 it
> > t
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> On Thursday 02 August 2012 16:50:36 Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> Dunno about the python-3.2 thing. Are you set to use 3.2 by default?
>> (How aggressive of you!) ;-) I'm set to use 2.7 as default which I
>> think is the overall recommendation of
Walter Dnes writes:
> You can get the ATTRS{serial} (i.e. serial number). See the printer
> example at http://www.reactivated.net/writing_udev_rules.html and adapt
> to your hard drive. Serial numbers should be unique, even amongst
> otherwise identical drives...
>
> =
On Thursday 02 August 2012 16:50:36 Mark Knecht wrote:
> Dunno about the python-3.2 thing. Are you set to use 3.2 by default?
> (How aggressive of you!) ;-) I'm set to use 2.7 as default which I
> think is the overall recommendation of dummies like me:
I thought so too, so I was surprised to find
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 01:34:04AM +0200, Alex Schuster wrote
> So I made some udev rules like this, and my drives are called /dev/hd1,
> hd2 and hd3:
>
> SUBSYSTEMS=="scsi", KERNEL=="sd?", ATTRS{model}=="SAMSUNG HD154UI",
> SYMLINK="hd1"
>
> This works fine, and this way I can address them in s
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Mark Knecht writes:
>
>> Check out the very nice 'lsdrv' script by Phil Turmel. Run it, save a
>> copy of the output for bad times.
>>
>> https://github.com/pturmel/lsdrv
>
> That doesn't work here, and I do not understand why. In line 305 it
Alex Schuster wrote:
> Mark Knecht writes:
>
>> Check out the very nice 'lsdrv' script by Phil Turmel. Run it, save a
>> copy of the output for bad times.
>>
>> https://github.com/pturmel/lsdrv
> That doesn't work here, and I do not understand why. In line 305 it tries
> and fails to create /dev/bl
Mark Knecht writes:
> Check out the very nice 'lsdrv' script by Phil Turmel. Run it, save a
> copy of the output for bad times.
>
> https://github.com/pturmel/lsdrv
That doesn't work here, and I do not understand why. In line 305 it tries
and fails to create /dev/block, which is already existing
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Alex Schuster writes:
>
>> Canek Peláez Valdés writes:
>
>> > $ ll /dev/disk/by-id
>> > ...
>> > ata-SAMSUNG_HD160JJ_S08HJ10YC13279 -> ../../sda
>> > ...
>> >
>> > That's a whole drive right there.
>>
>> Wow, now I feel really stupid :) You ar
Alex Schuster writes:
> Canek Peláez Valdés writes:
> > $ ll /dev/disk/by-id
> > ...
> > ata-SAMSUNG_HD160JJ_S08HJ10YC13279 -> ../../sda
> > ...
> >
> > That's a whole drive right there.
>
> Wow, now I feel really stupid :) You are so right, they are there, and I
> don't why I overlooked them..
Canek Peláez Valdés writes:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Alex Schuster
> wrote:
> > Canek Peláez Valdés writes:
> [ snip ]
> >> Oh, and I forgot; doesn't the links in /dev/disk/by-id,
> >> /dev/disk/by-label, /dev/disk/by-uuid do what you want to?
> >
> > Those seem to list partitions only,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Canek Peláez Valdés writes:
[ snip ]
>> Oh, and I forgot; doesn't the links in /dev/disk/by-id,
>> /dev/disk/by-label, /dev/disk/by-uuid do what you want to?
>
> Those seem to list partitions only, not whole drives. A label for a drive
> would
Canek Peláez Valdés writes:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Alex Schuster
> > wrote:
[...]
> >> Could there be another way to distinguish the drives, like looking
> >> at the partition scheme or something?
> >
> > If you want to
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Alex Schuster wrote:
>> Hi there!
>>
>> I do not understand the numbering of my hard drives. There may be some
>> inherent logic, but whenever I make some changes, like replacing drives,
>> or changing BI
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I do not understand the numbering of my hard drives. There may be some
> inherent logic, but whenever I make some changes, like replacing drives,
> or changing BIOS settings, the order changes. Maybe it's even more random.
>
> So
21 matches
Mail list logo
