On Tuesday 19 August 2008 18:35:18 Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
> When I say "tune" I mean things like picking a resolution and a
> deinterlace method for video that is as good as possible, while still
> leaving enough headroom to avoid uneven playback.
Ah, that puts a different spin on it. Those thi
On Dienstag, 19. August 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 August 2008 15:30:07 Dale wrote:
> > Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
> > > << SNIP >>
> > >
> > > I'm running the machine for multi-media-use, and I would like to make
> > > sure that I tune the media-programs to leave sufficcient cpu to ha
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 15:30:07 Dale wrote:
Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
<< SNIP >>
I'm running the machine for multi-media-use, and I would like to make
sure that I tune the media-programs to leave sufficcient cpu to handle
the odd house-keeping task, while at the s
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 15:30:07 Dale wrote:
> Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
> > << SNIP >>
> >
> > I'm running the machine for multi-media-use, and I would like to make
> > sure that I tune the media-programs to leave sufficcient cpu to handle
> > the odd house-keeping task, while at the same time doi
Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
<< SNIP >>
I'm running the machine for multi-media-use, and I would like to make
sure that I tune the media-programs to leave sufficcient cpu to handle
the odd house-keeping task, while at the same time doing as much
post-processing for image and sound quality as possi
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 15:02:34 Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
> Top reports ~70% idle, while at the same time the topmost couple of
> processes are reported as using >70%CPU. Is there anything I could use
> that reports more sensible values ?
>
> I'm running the machine for multi-media-use, and I woul
6 matches
Mail list logo
