Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pdftk - replacement

2018-03-15 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:55:23 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > ebuild /usr/local/portage/app-text/pdftk/pdftk-.ebuild manifest > /usr/local/portage/app-text/pdftk/pdftk-.ebuild: line 1: syntax > error near unexpected token > `newline' /usr/local/portage/app-text/pdftk/pdftk-.ebuil

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pdftk - replacement

2018-03-15 Thread Floyd Anderson
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:55:23 -0600 the...@sys-concept.com wrote: On 03/15/2018 10:49 AM, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2018-03-15, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: On 03/15/2018 08:48 AM, Grant Edwards wrote: Did you try the non-gcj ebuild for pdftk? I would like to try it. Where did you find it?

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pdftk - replacement

2018-03-15 Thread thelma
On 03/15/2018 10:49 AM, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2018-03-15, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> On 03/15/2018 08:48 AM, Grant Edwards wrote: >> >>> Did you try the non-gcj ebuild for pdftk? >> >> I would like to try it. >> Where did you find it? > >>From my earler posting: > >http://repo.or.c

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pdftk - replacement

2018-03-15 Thread thelma
On 03/15/2018 08:48 AM, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2018-03-15, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> That is not what I (we) need. >> pdfunite - will join several PDF file into one (this is not what I want). >> >> I need to "overlap" two PDF file, one on top of another, it is like >> watermarking. I

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pdftk - replacement

2018-03-14 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 19:48:36 GMT Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2018-03-14, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk". > > I'm assuming that was meant as a question? It was phrased as a question, so yes, it was a question. You, however, have writte