>
> That might even depend on the compiler version anyway. But, I agree.
> Building with -march=athlon (I think it's athlon?) on one FX machine and
> copying to the rest would be fastest.
>
>
Good call, I missed that. Of course it makes much more sense to build on a
fast FX box with -j8, but have
On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 21:20 +1100, Adam Carter wrote:
> You could install to one of the Athlons, then copy it to the other two
> Athlons and one of the FX machines. Then, reconfigure the FX
> install
> for more CPUs and native -march, recompile world and copy it
> t
You could install to one of the Athlons, then copy it to the other two
> Athlons and one of the FX machines. Then, reconfigure the FX install
> for more CPUs and native -march, recompile world and copy it to the
> other two FX machines.
>
Even that might not be worth it. Unless you're using some
On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 01:58 +, James wrote:
> Walter Dnes waltdnes.org> writes:
>
>
> > > I suspect there is way to dd an image right to a
> > > (pre-formatted) hard drive just like you would a flash drive?
>
> > Are the machines identical (cpu/gpu/peripherals)? I.e. can you use
> > the
4 matches
Mail list logo
