Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge ignoring -v switch

2011-12-07 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 17:13:56 +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > My PORTAGE_ELOG_CLASSES contains the item "log". Thusly for each > package I emerge I get a file in /var/log/portage wuth the compile > output as content. That setting controls the output of the elog messages. The destination of the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge ignoring -v switch

2011-12-07 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 06:13:22PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: > Indeed, that change gave me a 'wtf moment' for awhile. I used --jobs, and > the one time I purposefully emerge using single job to debug a failure... > the output is still MIA. Luckily it wasn't an emergency so I still had the > mind

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge ignoring -v switch

2011-12-07 Thread Dale
Pandu Poluan wrote: On Dec 7, 2011 6:00 PM, "Neil Bothwick" > wrote: > > On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 12:26:12 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > > > Not only did I mean to finish it, I thought I had. Using --jobs>1 sets > > > the quiet-build flag > > > > It also sets it i

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge ignoring -v switch

2011-12-07 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Dec 7, 2011 6:00 PM, "Neil Bothwick" wrote: > > On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 12:26:12 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > > > Not only did I mean to finish it, I thought I had. Using --jobs>1 sets > > > the quiet-build flag > > > > It also sets it if you don't use more than 1 job. As another poster > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge ignoring -v switch

2011-12-07 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 12:26:12 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > Not only did I mean to finish it, I thought I had. Using --jobs>1 sets > > the quiet-build flag > > It also sets it if you don't use more than 1 job. As another poster > (Hinnerk) already mentioned, the only way to get the old b