On 15 December 2005 23:56, Hani Duwaik wrote:
> On 12/15/05, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:29:55 +0100, Harald Arnesen wrote:
> > > > I don't use it any more because it is slow, cp and cat give the same
> > > > result and are faster.
> > >
> > > dd is not slowe
On 12/15/05, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:29:55 +0100, Harald Arnesen wrote:> > I don't use it any more because it is slow, cp and cat give the same> > result and are faster.>> dd is not slower than cp/cat if you increase the block size from the
> default 512 byte
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:29:55 +0100, Harald Arnesen wrote:
> > I don't use it any more because it is slow, cp and cat give the same
> > result and are faster.
>
> dd is not slower than cp/cat if you increase the block size from the
> default 512 bytes.
Increasing the block size does make it /almo
3 matches
Mail list logo
