On Wednesday 05 January 2011 00:55:49 Alex Schuster wrote:
> Dale writes:
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> Apparently, though unproven, at 15:18 on Tuesday 04 January 2011,
> >> Stroller did
> >>
> >> opine thusly:
> >>> I found numerous references to this syntax going back to 2005 or
> >>> so, and s
Dale writes:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> Apparently, though unproven, at 15:18 on Tuesday 04 January 2011, Stroller
>> did
>> opine thusly:
>>
>>> I found numerous references to this syntax going back to 2005 or
>>> so, and some major distros seem to use it as the default way of
>>> describing
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:18 on Tuesday 04 January 2011, Stroller did
opine thusly:
I found numerous references to this syntax going back to 2005 or
so, and some major distros seem to use it as the default way of
describing "root=" to the kernel.
http://www.li
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:18 on Tuesday 04 January 2011, Stroller did
opine thusly:
> On 4/1/2011, at 9:42am, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> >> ...
> >> Does
> >>
> >> boot=LABEL=
> >>
> >> in grub config work for you?
> >
> > I hoped so, but actually no. Grub complains at boot time not findi
>> boot=LABEL=
>>
>> in grub config work for you?
>
> I hoped so, but actually no. Grub complains at boot time not finding the
> root device. Is this available in the grub-0.97 series at all?
I am not sure about grub 2, but 0.97 knows nothing about filesystem
labels (and neither does the kernel
On 4/1/2011, at 9:42am, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> ...
>> Does
>>
>> boot=LABEL=
>>
>> in grub config work for you?
>
> I hoped so, but actually no. Grub complains at boot time not finding the
> root device. Is this available in the grub-0.97 series at all?
I found numerous references to this sy
6 matches
Mail list logo
