Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 10:48 -0800, kashani wrote:
I hate to be that guy, but why is anyone using an MTA that was last
updated in May 1998? Use Postfix (or any other MTA under active
development), it's simpler, easier, faster, and has more functionality
without jumping th
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 10:48 -0800, kashani wrote:
> I hate to be that guy, but why is anyone using an MTA that was last
> updated in May 1998? Use Postfix (or any other MTA under active
> development), it's simpler, easier, faster, and has more functionality
> without jumping through hoops.
I
KiLLeR 718th wrote:
Hey everybody,
I seem to have troubles installing qmail-1.03-r16,
trying to emerge it . . .
I hate to be that guy, but why is anyone using an MTA that was last
updated in May 1998? Use Postfix (or any other MTA under active
development), it's simpler, easier, faster, and
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 12:34:01 Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> What's going on here is that qmail depends on queue-fix which post-depends
> on virtual/qmail (a new style virtual) whose default provider is netqmail.
> netqmail blocks qmail which hence reverse blocks netqmail. ;)
>
> Clearly the porta
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 09:48:52 KiLLeR 718th wrote:
> I seem to have troubles installing qmail-1.03-r16,
> trying to emerge it . . .
>
> server ~ # emerge -vp mail-mta/qmail
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [blocks B ] mail-mta
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 03:48:52AM -0500, KiLLeR 718th wrote:
> Hey everybody,
>
> I seem to have troubles installing qmail-1.03-r16,
> trying to emerge it . . .
>
> server ~ # emerge -vp mail-mta/qmail
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies... d
6 matches
Mail list logo
