Apparently, though unproven, at 12:20 on Sunday 05 June 2011, Sebastian Beßler
did opine thusly:
> Am 05.06.2011 11:53, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> > I don't see the point of editing a quote actually :-)
>
> Oh there a many uses for that. Replying to specifig parts of a quote for
> example.
>
> >
Am 05.06.2011 11:53, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> I don't see the point of editing a quote actually :-)
Oh there a many uses for that. Replying to specifig parts of a quote for
example.
> Unless you mean reformatting it to still fit in 78 columns
I edit quotes nearly by every anwser, to delete part
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:30 on Sunday 05 June 2011, Neil Bothwick
did opine thusly:
> On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 21:57:45 +0100, Stroller wrote:
> > >> I thought *every* mail client for smart phones did that,
> > >
> > > No, only the crap ones.
> >
> > I find K9-Mail otherwise really nice. Wh
Original-Nachricht
Von: Neil Bothwick
> K9, it defaults to top-posting, but you
> can change it.
K9 is the best mobil mailclient.
> However, you can't
> edit the text you are quoting, so it is still > rather top-posting-centric.
Sure you can as you see AT this Mail!
--
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 21:57:45 +0100, Stroller wrote:
> >> I thought *every* mail client for smart phones did that,
> >
> > No, only the crap ones.
>
> I find K9-Mail otherwise really nice. What are you using?
K9, it defaults to top-posting, but you can change it. However, you can't
edit the t
On 4 June 2011, at 09:45, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 01:49:22 +0100, Stroller wrote:
>
>>> So it's like that Java-based gmail client for smartphones? The one
>>> that can only top posts and gives the user no way to do it
>>> otherwise.
>>
>> I thought *every* mail client for sma
Apparently, though unproven, at 03:33 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
> Indi wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 03:00:01AM +0200, Stroller wrote:
> >> On 3 June 2011, at 08:44, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >>> ...
> >>> So it's like that Java-based gmail client for smartphones? The one
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 01:49:22 +0100, Stroller wrote:
> > So it's like that Java-based gmail client for smartphones? The one
> > that can only top posts and gives the user no way to do it
> > otherwise.
>
> I thought *every* mail client for smart phones did that,
No, only the crap ones.
--
Nei
On 4 June 2011, at 02:33, Dale wrote:
> …
> What I would like to know is why some threads get broken up? My mail client
> here follows these conversations as threads. For some reason, recently the
> threads are getting broken as if someone started a fresh one.
>
> I'm sure this is not intenti
Indi wrote:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 03:00:01AM +0200, Stroller wrote:
On 3 June 2011, at 08:44, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
So it's like that Java-based gmail client for smartphones? The one that can
only top posts and gives the user no way to do it otherwise.
I thought *every*
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 03:00:01AM +0200, Stroller wrote:
>
> On 3 June 2011, at 08:44, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > ...
> > So it's like that Java-based gmail client for smartphones? The one that can
> > only top posts and gives the user no way to do it otherwise.
>
> I thought *every* mail client
On 3 June 2011, at 08:44, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> ...
> So it's like that Java-based gmail client for smartphones? The one that can
> only top posts and gives the user no way to do it otherwise.
I thought *every* mail client for smart phones did that, these days, and that
we on this list had gon
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:16 on Thursday 02 June 2011, Paul Hartman
did opine thusly:
> > There's something wrong with your mailer, it's doing weird stuff with
> > line breaks. Please fix it.
>
> Sun Java mail suite (client and server) have been mangling e-mail
> messages for years. It'
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 19:45 on Thursday 02 June 2011,
> dhk...@optonline.net did opine thusly:
>
>> - Original Message -From: Paul Hartman Date: Thursday, June 2, 2011
>> 12:41 pmSubject: Re: [gentoo-user] OT: website designT
On Thursday 02 Jun 2011 17:39:51 Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Peter Humphrey
>
> wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > Off-topic, I know (sorry)!, but I hope someone will have an answer.
> >
> > Are there any mapping tools for Linux that can be given a URL and produce
> > a d
Apparently, though unproven, at 19:45 on Thursday 02 June 2011,
dhk...@optonline.net did opine thusly:
> - Original Message -From: Paul Hartman Date: Thursday, June 2, 2011
> 12:41 pmSubject: Re: [gentoo-user] OT: website designTo:
> gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11
- Original Message -From: Paul Hartman Date: Thursday, June 2, 2011
12:41 pmSubject: Re: [gentoo-user] OT: website designTo:
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Peter Humphrey>
wrote:> > Hello list,> >> > Off-topic, I know (sorry)!, but I hope someone will
ha
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Off-topic, I know (sorry)!, but I hope someone will have an answer.
>
> Are there any mapping tools for Linux that can be given a URL and produce a
> diagram showing all the internal connections (links) between its pages?
I
18 matches
Mail list logo
