On Fri, 13 May 2005 02:08:54 -0400, Calvin Spealman wrote:
> Thats seems a good configuration, but what about /etc/hostname? thats
> what im not sure of, how to set what the box sees as its own hostname,
> without setting it to the domain (because thats the router/network),
> but still with Postfi
Thats seems a good configuration, but what about /etc/hostname? thats
what im not sure of, how to set what the box sees as its own hostname,
without setting it to the domain (because thats the router/network),
but still with Postfix and apache running.
I guess I can use the config files for them a
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 02:34 -0400, Calvin Spealman wrote:
> ive got a network question. i have a few machines on my local
> network, but only one IP.
> But, i
> don't intend to run all the server daemons on one box for long.
> i want to be able to
> address the different boxes by unique names
On Thu, 12 May 2005 11:45:47 -0400, Calvin Spealman wrote:
> This is as I had hoped, and maybe I'm doing something wrong, but if I
> don't give my boxes a proper domain name, apache and postfix will not
> start. They complain about the domain name and bail out.
You can give them any name you like
This is as I had hoped, and maybe I'm doing something wrong, but if I
don't give my boxes a proper domain name, apache and postfix will not
start. They complain about the domain name and bail out.
On 5/12/05, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 May 2005 02:34:11 -0400, Calvin Spe
On Thu, 12 May 2005 02:34:11 -0400, Calvin Spealman wrote:
> ive got a network question. i have a few machines on my local
> network, but only one IP. I can congure my router for all the proper
> port forwarding for my server, but hostnames is giving me some
> confusion. To run a lot of things pr
6 matches
Mail list logo
