On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>> > tun - to uniplexed node?
>> > tap - to any person?
> As I used them they are not related. DSA and RSA are key hash algorithms, I
> can never tell them apart and have to haul out the man page to rediscover
> whic
On Wednesday 24 December 2008, 11:39, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > >> DSA / RSA
> > >> tun / tap
> > >
> > > tun - to uniplexed node?
> > > tap - to any person?
> > > it makes some vague sense
> >
> > I think what Alan refers to is:
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TUN/TAP
> >
> > I'm not sure if this
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> As I used them they are not related. DSA and RSA are key hash algorithms, I
> can never tell them apart and have to haul out the man page to rediscover
> which one I tell my users to use :-)
>
> tun & tap - same thing. One is routed, one is more like level 2. Do you think
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 12:27:29 pk wrote:
> Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 1:36 AM, Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> >> DSA / RSA
> >> tun / tap
> >
> > tun - to uniplexed node?
> > tap - to any person?
> > it makes some vague sense
>
> I think what Alan refers to is:
> http://
Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 1:36 AM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>> DSA / RSA
>> tun / tap
> tun - to uniplexed node?
> tap - to any person?
> it makes some vague sense
I think what Alan refers to is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TUN/TAP
I'm not sure if this is what he seeks:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 1:36 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> DSA / RSA
> tun / tap
tun - to uniplexed node?
tap - to any person?
it makes some vague sense
6 matches
Mail list logo
