Daniel da Veiga wrote:
> I've used genkernel for a good time now and I'm happy with it, switch
> from regular kernel and never had problems, in fact I recommend it.
> LILO, well, this is a problematic one, sincerely, since its earlier
> versions I always had trouble with it.
>
I'm also a happy ge
I agree, early genkernels did a good job, then it just started causing
too much grief. When faultfinding things like driver problems, boot
problems or almost anything kernel, dumping genkernel is a good first
step. I suppose they might have fixed it by now, but the problems it
caused me means I a
I've used genkernel for a good time now and I'm happy with it, switch
from regular kernel and never had problems, in fact I recommend it.
LILO, well, this is a problematic one, sincerely, since its earlier
versions I always had trouble with it.
On 6/30/05, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 07:06:14 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> > Its been said before: many of us dont use genkernel because of various
> > problems...
> Problems with genkernel? Works fine for me ;-). I haven't use lilo in
> ages though.
It does cause a lot of problems though. We it works right, you
A. Khattri wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Richard Watson wrote:
>
>
>>I've been struggling for days now to get my genkernel image to boot.
>
>
> Its been said before: many of us dont use genkernel because of various
> problems...
>
>
Problems with genkernel? Works fine for me ;-). I haven't
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Richard Watson wrote:
> I've been struggling for days now to get my genkernel image to boot.
Its been said before: many of us dont use genkernel because of various
problems...
--
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
6 matches
Mail list logo
