Re: [gentoo-user] Install CD sees 2 ethernet ports

2006-07-26 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:38:49 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: > Thanks Daniel and Louis. With "nofirewire" the boot messages showed 2 > eth devices, but the real ethernet chip now comes up as eth0, which is > what I wanted. You can use udev rules to ensure your network interfaces are correctly named,

Re: [gentoo-user] Install CD sees 2 ethernet ports

2006-07-25 Thread Walter Dnes
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 01:08:19PM -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote > >I think eth0 is your FireWire port (IEEE 1394). > > > >You did the right thing already (taking eth0 down). Now you can > >install Gentoo and unless you configure support for Ethernet over > >FireWire (or something similar) in your

Re: [gentoo-user] Install CD sees 2 ethernet ports

2006-07-25 Thread Daniel da Veiga
On 7/25/06, louis brazeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/25/06, Walter Dnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For some reason, the X86 minimal install CD sees ethernet ports > according to the startup message. When I ifconfig after booting the > install CD, it shows only eth1. I entered values in

Re: [gentoo-user] Install CD sees 2 ethernet ports

2006-07-25 Thread louis brazeau
On 7/25/06, Walter Dnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For some reason, the X86 minimal install CD sees ethernet ports according to the startup message. When I ifconfig after booting the install CD, it shows only eth1. I entered values into both eth0 and eth1 via net-setup. It looks like eth1 is