Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!

2007-01-05 Thread qfpvajdy
On Thursday 04 January 2007 18:01, Thomas Rösner wrote: > Nelson wrote: > >> This is strange, I just made a emerge sync and then a emerge > >> --update world. > >> I have still version 1.4.5. I use x86 (no ~x86). > >> [...] > >> Maybe have I to do an emerge -uD ? because I do only emerge --up

Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!

2007-01-04 Thread Thomas Rösner
Nelson wrote: This is strange, I just made a emerge sync and then a emerge --update world. I have still version 1.4.5. I use x86 (no ~x86). [...] Maybe have I to do an emerge -uD ? because I do only emerge --update ? I don't think that's the problem. To my knowledge the -D means update re

Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!

2007-01-04 Thread Thomas Rösner
qfpvajdy wrote: Maybe have I to do an emerge -uD ? because I do only emerge --update ? Yes. Or use glsa-check. Regards, T. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

RE: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!

2007-01-04 Thread
> -Original Message- > From: qfpvajdy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 January 2007 16:18 > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG! > > This is strange, I just made a emerge sync and then a emerge >

Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!

2007-01-04 Thread Richard Fish
On 1/4/07, qfpvajdy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I'm surprised that after several "emerge sync" and "emerge --update world" operations since Wed Dec 6 2006, Gentoo has still not upgraded to GnuPG version 1.4.6. It's always helpful if you tell us your arch when you post things like this.

Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!

2007-01-04 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thursday 04 January 2007 15:34, Nelson, David (ED, PAR&D) wrote: > Do you have it unmasked? My system is ~x86 and I have 1.4.6 and 2.0.1 > (I think) but I'm not sure if these are officially the latest stable > versions. 1.4.6 is currently marked x86 so any up to date tree will emerge that (unl

RE: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!

2007-01-04 Thread
> -Original Message- > From: Graham Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 January 2007 14:05 > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG! > > > "Nelson, David (ED, PAR&D)" <[EMAIL

Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!

2007-01-04 Thread Graham Murray
"Nelson, David (ED, PAR&D)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do you have it unmasked? My system is ~x86 and I have 1.4.6 and > 2.0.1 (I think) but I'm not sure if these are officially the latest > stable versions. How did you manage to have both 1.4.6 and 2.0.1 installed at the same time? 2.0.1 has

RE: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!

2007-01-04 Thread kristian
4 Jan 2007 13:34:00 - To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG! >> -Original Message- >> From: Thomas Rösner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: 04 January 2007 10:21 >> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org >

RE: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!

2007-01-04 Thread
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Rösner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 January 2007 10:21 > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG! > > > qfpvajdy wrote: > > Hello, > > > > [...a

Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!

2007-01-04 Thread Thomas Rösner
qfpvajdy wrote: Hello, [...advisory..] Could the maintainer please update to gnupg version 1.4.6? Currently the Gentoo GNU/Linux distribution delivers version 1.4.5. Then how did I get this? Installed versions: 1.4.6 Regards, T. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list