Re: [gentoo-user] Can't mount NTFS read-write

2008-03-15 Thread Chris Brennan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ntfs-3g is better then the kernel ntfs drivers Stroller wrote: | Hi guys, | | It's kinda late by my erratic bodyclock, so I'm assuming I'm doing | something stupid. Can anyone slap me with a kipper, please? | | (Or should I be using the fuse NTFS dr

Re: [gentoo-user] Can't mount NTFS read-write

2008-03-15 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:40:11 +0100, Florian Philipp wrote: > By the way: Which one is better (or are they the same?): ntfs-3g or > ntfsprogs with USE="fuse"? ntfs3g is the driver, ntfsprogs contains the mkfs, resize, fsck etc. programs, the fuse USE flag enables support for fuse filesystems. In

Re: [gentoo-user] Can't mount NTFS read-write

2008-03-15 Thread Florian Philipp
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 09:48 +, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:33:09 +, Stroller wrote: > > > It's kinda late by my erratic bodyclock, so I'm assuming I'm doing > > something stupid. Can anyone slap me with a kipper, please? > > Don't try to write with the in-kernel NTFS

Re: [gentoo-user] Can't mount NTFS read-write

2008-03-15 Thread Stroller
On 15 Mar 2008, at 09:48, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:33:09 +, Stroller wrote: It's kinda late by my erratic bodyclock, so I'm assuming I'm doing something stupid. Can anyone slap me with a kipper, please? Don't try to write with the in-kernel NTFS driver. (Or should

Re: [gentoo-user] Can't mount NTFS read-write

2008-03-15 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:33:09 +, Stroller wrote: > It's kinda late by my erratic bodyclock, so I'm assuming I'm doing > something stupid. Can anyone slap me with a kipper, please? Don't try to write with the in-kernel NTFS driver. > (Or should I be using the fuse NTFS driver?) Yes, most d