Re: [gentoo-user] Bug 919184 - sys-libs/libstdc++-v3-3.3.6-r4

On 9/9/24 8:50 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On Mon, 2024-09-09 at 21:33 -0300, João Matos wrote: >> Dear list, >> >> I'm trying to install the Checkpoint client for linux (cshell_install). It >> requires sys-libs/libstdc++-v3, 32 bits. I couldn't compile it and found >> this bug: https://bugs.gent

Fwd: Re: [gentoo-user] Bug 919184 - sys-libs/libstdc++-v3-3.3.6-r4

Resending from a different email, as I got an error sending on my main email. -- Forwarded message - De la: stefan1 Date: mar., 10 sept. 2024, 15:13 Subject: Fwd: Re: [gentoo-user] Bug 919184 - sys-libs/libstdc++-v3-3.3.6-r4 To: Stefanalexe48 Original Message

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug 919184 - sys-libs/libstdc++-v3-3.3.6-r4

> TIL that we have a twenty-year-old libstdc++ in the tree. Maybe we should mask it? It is supossed to work with gcc <3.4 and the oldest we have is 8.5.0, which is masked already. Original Message On 9/10/24 02:50, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On Mon, 2024-09-09 at 21:33 -030

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug 919184 - sys-libs/libstdc++-v3-3.3.6-r4

On Mon, 2024-09-09 at 21:33 -0300, João Matos wrote: > Dear list, > > I'm trying to install the Checkpoint client for linux (cshell_install). It > requires sys-libs/libstdc++-v3, 32 bits. I couldn't compile it and found > this bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/919184 TIL that we have a twenty-year-old

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons?

On 13/12/2021 22:03, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: If they are involved multiple times with the default options I think any attempt to scrub something that is already being scrubbed is just a no-op. Obviously if you don't want all that IO during the day you'll have to do something more clever - you

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons?

Am Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 04:54:30PM -0500 schrieb Rich Freeman: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 4:42 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 22:38 +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > > > > > Well I *could* disable run-crons altogether and add entries to fcron’s own > > > crontab which w

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons?

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 4:42 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 22:38 +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > > > Well I *could* disable run-crons altogether and add entries to fcron’s own > > crontab which would run those scripts in /etc/cron.{hourly,daily,...} > > instead. > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons?

On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 22:38 +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > Well I *could* disable run-crons altogether and add entries to fcron’s own > crontab which would run those scripts in /etc/cron.{hourly,daily,...} > instead. > > However, I like predictable times at which those jobs will run. Especi

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons?

Am Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 04:33:32PM -0500 schrieb Michael Orlitzky: > On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 22:19 +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > > > For the record: The checks in run-crons that I referred to earlier are > > actually more for those cases in which the machine was powered off for a > > while in

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons?

On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 22:19 +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > For the record: The checks in run-crons that I referred to earlier are > actually more for those cases in which the machine was powered off for a > while in order to restore cron completeness as early as possible after boot. > The

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons?

Am Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 03:18:44PM -0500 schrieb Rich Freeman: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 2:07 PM Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > > > Am Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 01:41:33PM -0500 schrieb Rich Freeman: > > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 1:21 PM Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I don't use this, b

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons?

On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 2:07 PM Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > Am Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 01:41:33PM -0500 schrieb Rich Freeman: > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 1:21 PM Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > > > > > > I don't use this, but I believe there should be an hourly crontab > > entry that deletes the cro

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons?

Am Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 01:41:33PM -0500 schrieb Rich Freeman: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 1:21 PM Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > > > It uses state files in /var/spool/cron/lastrun/ to know when each interval > > was last run, so it only runs once per period. But: the age threshold for > > the state

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons?

On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 1:21 PM Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > It uses state files in /var/spool/cron/lastrun/ to know when each interval > was last run, so it only runs once per period. But: the age threshold for > the state file is period + 5 minutes. Shouldn’t that be period - 5 minutes? > > My

Re: [gentoo-user] [bug] uClibc-ng-1.0.33 won't fetch

On 5/5/20 9:59 PM, akater wrote: > Michael Orlitzky writes: > >> www-client/pybugz > > I have that one installed, actually! But I'd rather use it through > Elisp interface... which I'm likely to write if nobody else does but > it's unlikely to happen in the upcoming months. And I'm concerned o

Re: [gentoo-user] [bug] uClibc-ng-1.0.33 won't fetch

Michael Orlitzky writes: > www-client/pybugz I have that one installed, actually! But I'd rather use it through Elisp interface... which I'm likely to write if nobody else does but it's unlikely to happen in the upcoming months. And I'm concerned of being banned during prototyping. signature

Re: [gentoo-user] [bug] uClibc-ng-1.0.33 won't fetch

On 5/5/20 5:43 PM, tastytea wrote: > >> If there's an Emacs-friendly way to post bugs, I'd be glad to know: >> there are ≈6 bugs and patches waiting in my queue. > > I searched a few weeks ago but couldn't find anything. :-( > www-client/pybugz

Re: [gentoo-user] [bug] uClibc-ng-1.0.33 won't fetch

On 2020-05-05T15:15+ akater wrote: > tastytea writes: > > > Same here. You should report it to > > . > > Thanks for checking. I'm sorry but the only way I could post to > bugzilla now is from a web browser—which is very unpleasant on

Re: [gentoo-user] [bug] uClibc-ng-1.0.33 won't fetch

tastytea writes: > Same here. You should report it to > . Thanks for checking. I'm sorry but the only way I could post to bugzilla now is from a web browser—which is very unpleasant on its own, and on top of that I only have graphical browser

Re: [gentoo-user] [bug] uClibc-ng-1.0.33 won't fetch

On 2020-05-05T12:03+ akater wrote: > I can't fetch sys-libs/uclibc-ng-1.0.33 from distfiles.gentoo.org > (404), and the file fetched from downloads-uclibc-ng.org has a hash > different from that in Manifest. Thus, uclibc-ng-1.0.33 can't be > installed, and I guess it's a bug. Same here. You

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG : kernel 4.5.1 and ALSA

21.04.2016 11:28, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote: Hi gentoo-users, A few days ago I updated linux kernel to 4.5.1. Yesterday I got a disk space overflow in my /home partition. Cleaned it up and rebooted, just to run into the same issue today m

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG : kernel 4.5.1 and ALSA

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote: > Hi gentoo-users, > > A few days ago I updated linux kernel to 4.5.1. Yesterday I got a disk space > overflow in my /home partition. Cleaned it up and rebooted, just to run into > the same issue today morning. Investigations revealed that

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey? SOLVED!!

Hello there Just for the record: I was able to solve the problem!! I created a separate environment file in /etc/portage/env. The content of this file is: -8<--- CFLAGS="-pipe " CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS} " MAKEOPTS="-j1 " -8<--- The CFLAGS n

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey?

On 2013-02-12, Elias Diem wrote: > `Illegal statement' in the build.log. The above should read `Illegal instruction'. -- Greetings Elias

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey?

Hi there Well I did reinstall my whole system but without luck. Emerging gnome-light showed the very same error when compiling spidermonkey. Then I thought I will install awesome, because it does not need spidermonkey. But the same problem here when compiling awesome. `Illegal statement' in t

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey?

On Friday 08 February 2013 07:46:16 PM IST, Elias Diem wrote: > On 2013-02-07, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: > >> Seems like one. Try compiling an older version? > > Actually I can compile version 1.7.0 > > But: When I want to update world, it needs (I think) version > 1.8.5-r1 > Try adding =dev-lang

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey?

On 2013-02-07, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: > Seems like one. Try compiling an older version? Actually I can compile version 1.7.0 But: When I want to update world, it needs (I think) version 1.8.5-r1 -- Greetings Elias

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey?

Hi Nilesh On 2013-02-07, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: > Seems like one. Try compiling an older version? I'm about to try. I will report back. -- Greetings Elias

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey?

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Elias Diem wrote: > Hello all > > I'm encountering a bug when emerging spidermonkey. > > The output from build.log is attached. > > If you need more info, please tell me so. > > Thanks. > Seems like one. Try compiling an older version? -- Nilesh Govindrajan http

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug 290437 (gcc-config)

>Hmm, odd. I thought everyone used to be able to reopen bugs. Ooops. i assumed the opposite because several people complained about having the same bug after it was closed in the comments but did not reopen it. But in fact i did not try. Shame on me :) >Well, it looks like mailto:vap...@gentoo.or

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug 290437 (gcc-config)

Am 22.09.2011 12:22, schrieb Jonas de Buhr: > Hi guys, > > i just ran into this bug again: > > sys-devel/gcc-config suggests gcc re-merge when profile is invalid > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290437 > > which is in status RESOLVED FIXED which is clearly not the case. > > who can ch

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: X/4018

On Tuesday 01 February 2011 13:02:46 Adam Carter wrote: > Volker - do you have CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU set? (X) Tree-based hierarchical RCU RCU Implementation (Tree-based hierarchical RCU) ---> │ │ │ │[ ] Enable tracing for RCU

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: X/4018

On Sunday 30 January 2011 18:08:50 Mark Knecht wrote: > None the less it seems like the message suggests that the driver is > coded incorrectly. more likely the gentoo-sources patchset is broken.

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: X/4018

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Adam Carter wrote: > I use gentoo-sources and have been getting that for as long as i've used > fglrx (since 9.6, ie driver version 8.62). I don't notice any issue so just > ignore it. > Thanks Adam! I guess it's been there for the last week (when I gave up on the

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: X/4018

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > On Sunday 30 January 2011 12:40:29 Mark Knecht wrote: >> Hi, >>    I haven't used the closed source ATI driver for long but I don't >> remember seeing this dmesg error before. It's not high priority for me >> as I'll be switching out t

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: X/4018

I use gentoo-sources and have been getting that for as long as i've used fglrx (since 9.6, ie driver version 8.62). I don't notice any issue so just ignore it.

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: X/4018

On Sunday 30 January 2011 12:40:29 Mark Knecht wrote: > Hi, >I haven't used the closed source ATI driver for long but I don't > remember seeing this dmesg error before. It's not high priority for me > as I'll be switching out the graphics card to an NVidia card hopefully > tomorrow, but is this

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug about possibly incomplete bugfix

On Saturday 10 July 2010 19:21:28 Nuno J. Silva wrote: > (I asked this on IRC more than an hour ago, got no reply, so here goes > it to the list.) > > What's the policy when you think that a change made due to a FIXED bug > needs more changes? Should you just comment it, fill another bug or > chan

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug

. Does kde also use this function to change its time and date? Where would one find the source package for 'date'? Dan --- On Wed, 4/14/10, Dale wrote: From: Dale Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Bug To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wednesday, April 14, 2010, 12:12 PM dan blum

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:14 PM, dan blum wrote: > I see 'date' is a binary file. Does kde also use this function to change its > time and date? Where would one find the source package for 'date'? $ equery b `which date` * Searching for /usr/bin/date ... sys-apps/coreutils-8.4 (/bin/date) (if

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug

o use this function to change its time and date? Where would one find the source package for 'date'? Dan --- On Wed, 4/14/10, Dale wrote: > From: Dale > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Bug > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Date: Wednesday, April 14, 2010, 12:12 PM >

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug

Am 19.04.2010 00:41, schrieb dan blum: Dale, Thanks for following up. HOw do you start a new thread? It is slightly annoying when you change a setting and reverts back to the original; the whole (computer) system should be more user friendly. Either way, it is good that there is an "easy" fix

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug

dan blum wrote: Dale, Thanks for following up. HOw do you start a new thread? It is slightly annoying when you change a setting and reverts back to the original; the whole (computer) system should be more user friendly. Either way, it is good that there is an "easy" fix, which I will do. I w

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug

have much more complex issues to discuss shortly. Thanks. --- On Wed, 4/14/10, Dale wrote: > From: Dale > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Bug > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Date: Wednesday, April 14, 2010, 12:12 PM > dan blum wrote: > > I run KDE on my system and my clock

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug

dan blum wrote: I run KDE on my system and my clock is wrong. I corrected several times from KDE, which sets the time to next boot, when it reverts to the old setting. This looks like slight bug. Since mailing list users generally use threaded messages, please start a new message instead

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:46 AM, dan blum wrote: > I run KDE on my system and my clock is wrong. I corrected several times from > KDE, which sets the time to next boot, when it reverts to the old setting. > This looks like slight bug. Check this option in your file /etc/conf.d/hwclock # If yo

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug 246672 ATI-DRIVERS

On Mittwoch 26 November 2008, James wrote: > I've got an ati/amd64 system that no matter what combo > of xorg-server, xorg-x11 and ati-drivers, I cannot get > it to work. > > lspci shows: > 00:00.0 Host bridge: ATI Technologies Inc > RD580 [CrossFire Xpress 3200] > Chipset > Host Bridge > 00:02.0 P

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug 246672 ATI-DRIVERS

James wrote: > Hello, > > One of my (ati) systems has been screwed up a few days now because of > bug 246672. > > Long story short, I have no ati-drivers installed and when I try to > emerge it, I get: > > Cannot write to '/usr/lib32/opengl/ati/extensions' > Please check permissions and director

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug 246672 ATI-DRIVERS

On Dienstag 25 November 2008, James wrote: > Hello, > > One of my (ati) systems has been screwed up a few days now because of > bug 246672. > > Long story short, I have no ati-drivers installed and when I try to > emerge it, I get: > > Cannot write to '/usr/lib32/opengl/ati/extensions' > Please che

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in /etc/init.d/netmount?

Hi Dan, Dan Farrell wrote: > AFAIK you are correct, this is a bug in a few of the initscripts that > don't behave sensibly if the root fs is network mounted. thx for your answer a raised a bug report with the number: 194967. Bye Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software eng

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in /etc/init.d/netmount?

On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:33:02 +0200 Matthias Fechner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have here a gentoo diskless system which boots over pxeboot and > mount everything over NFS from my big Gentoo server. > > But at shutdown I get the error message: > Failed to simply unmount filesystems >

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in bash ?

On Saturday 21 April 2007 09:52:40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Can somebody explain why > ls [A-Z]* > works as ls * (or ls -R): > It seems that [A-Z] is ignored by bash-3.1.17 on amd64. > The expression works as expected with zsh... Try `ls [[:upper:]]*`. Also -R is recursive. You should google tha

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in bash ?

On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:44:09 +0200 Jan Seeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is no bug. Bash globs everything that begins with A-Z (also > directories) and then gives that list to ls. So ls lists all these > files and the directories that begin with A-Z. Strangely though, bash > seems to ignore

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in bash ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is no bug. Bash globs everything that begins with A-Z (also directories) and then gives that list to ls. So ls lists all these files and the directories that begin with A-Z. Strangely though, bash seems to ignore case. (When I try your command, ls

Re: [gentoo-user] bug in usermod, full name of options doesn't work

At Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:13:18 +0100 Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Allan Gottlieb wrote: >> Goal: add gottlieb to group scanner. >> >> It seems that -aG works but --append --groups doesn't > > Please try attached patch. > I'll report this bug upstream, mentioning that you found it.

Re: [gentoo-user] bug in usermod, full name of options doesn't work

Allan Gottlieb wrote: > Goal: add gottlieb to group scanner. > > It seems that -aG works but --append --groups doesn't Please try attached patch. I'll report this bug upstream, mentioning that you found it. Benno diff -ur cvs-shadow/src/usermod.c shadow/src/usermod.c --- cvs-shadow/src/usermod.c

Re: [gentoo-user] bug in usermod, full name of options doesn't work

On Friday 12 January 2007 18:46, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > Goal: add gottlieb to group scanner. > > It seems that -aG works but --append --groups doesn't > > I will file a bug in b.g.o. unless I did something wrong. I wouldn't be surprised if it would be RESOLVED UPSTREAM. Guess there's only one wa

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG 2.6.17-gentoo-r8 does not compile

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:04:40 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote: > After menuconfig > make > terminates due to a shell syntax error. > Are the gentoo kernel patches buggy? Who knows? Maybe if the error message wasn't considered Top Secret, someone would be able to shed some light on the cause.

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG 2.6.17-gentoo-r8 does not compile

> After menuconfig > make > terminates due to a shell syntax error. > Are the gentoo kernel patches buggy? > > Many thanks for hint, hint: posting an exact copy of the output from your terminal would probably get you more help ;) -- Iain Buchanan Does the name Pavlov ring a bell? -- gent

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG 2.6.17-gentoo-r8 does not compile

Hi,   I don't know if it's relevant but as the installation guide says, I do 'make && make modules_install'. Otherwise you could try to use genkernel, just to see if kernel sources are corrupted.  On 9/13/06, Helmut Jarausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,gentoo doesn't seem to like me.Trying to ins

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug report.

thanks All On 12/20/05, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Allan Spagnol Comar wrote: > > >Where Do I do a bug report > > > >I received this a moment ago when I run emerge --sync. > > > > > Updating Portage cache: 88%!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package > > > >name to an ebuild. > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug report.

Allan Spagnol Comar wrote: Where Do I do a bug report I received this a moment ago when I run emerge --sync. Updating Portage cache: 88%!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package name to an ebuild. !!! This is a bug, please report it. (virtual/x11-6.8) don´t know where to post it --

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug report.

On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 15:22 -0300, Allan Spagnol Comar wrote: > Where Do I do a bug report > > I received this a moment ago when I run emerge --sync. > >>> Updating Portage cache: 88%!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package > name to an ebuild. > !!! This is a bug, please report it. (virtual/x11-6.8

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug report.

On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 15:22 -0300, Allan Spagnol Comar wrote: > Where Do I do a bug report > > I received this a moment ago when I run emerge --sync. > >>> Updating Portage cache: 88%!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package > name to an ebuild. > !!! This is a bug, please report it. (virtual/x11-6.8

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in net.eth0?

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 15:01:29 -0800, Hareesh Nagarajan wrote: > Version: # $Header: > /home/cvsroot/gentoo-src/rc-scripts/init.d/net.eth0,v 1.41 2004/05/10 > 14:16:35 agriffis Exp $ This looks like a very old script. /etc/init.d/net.eth0 should now be a symlink to net.lo. -- Neil Bothwick Pres

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG in glibc????

On Sunday 30 October 2005 13:54, capsel wrote: > is it a bug in glibc or in my code? Probably not a bug in glibc. I'm 99% sure that there are no bugs that obvious in printf or strcmp. glibc is absolutely the most tested code in a GNU/Linux system, aside from the kernel itself, seeing as it is use

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG in glibc????

capsel wrote: j=strcmp( "log", *(lines+i) ); printf( "ble\n" ); if( strcmp( "log", *(lines+i) ) == 0 ) { printf( "ble2\n" ); it looks to me like you're probably getting an invalid pointer reference. When th

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG in glibc???? [WAY OT]

capsel wrote: Hi all, is it a bug in glibc or in my code? This is so far off topic, it isn't even funny. But, I see a couple bugs in your code. I will cover them inline: if( ( config_content == NULL ) || ( config_content==0 ) ) Not really a bug here, but since NULL and 0

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug, or PEBKAC?

Holly Bostick wrote: Hey, I've been trying to run an emerge -uaDtv world for the past couple of days, and dev-libs/liboil fails to upgrade from 0.3.2 to 0.3.3 with the following error: conv_sse.c: In function `conv_f32_s32_sse': conv_sse.c:44: error: `__m128' undeclared (first use in this func

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug, or PEBKAC?

FEATURES="autoconfig ccache distlocks fixpackages sandbox sfperms strict userpriv usersandbox" I would try getting rid of ccache, first.. and if you have distcc installed (portage still could be using it if you updated your profile and path). -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug, or PEBKAC?

are you using distcc or ccache? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG? - bridge-utils no binary?

Hi, ...SKIP... > > Ognjen Bezanov wrote: > >> Hello >> >> I am building a linux AP using a clean installation of gentoo and this >> howto: >> >> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Building_a_Wireless_Access_Point_With_Gentoo >> >> >> Everything was going great until I came to emerging bridge-utils. >> >

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG? - bridge-utils no binary?

Check the emerge logs and see what files were copied where (the part where it's like /usr/bin/brctl - or whatever). It may be that the command is slightly different with this version. *shrugs* Ognjen Bezanov wrote: Hello I am building a linux AP using a clean installation of gentoo and this h

Re: [gentoo-user] bug in 'sed'?

ok! Thanks a lot! I've written an export LC_ALL=C at the beginning of my script, and everything is fine. :) Je la Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 12:15:54PM +0100, Edward Catmur skribis: > On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 12:09 +0200, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/doc/xmligo/glosa $ echo "adela

Re: [gentoo-user] bug in 'sed'?

On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 12:09 +0200, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/doc/xmligo/glosa $ echo "adela G" | \ > sed 's/^\([-A-FH-Za-z \?]\+\)/:\1:/' > :adela G: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] viric $ echo "adela G" | sed 's/^\([-A-FH-Za-z > \?]\+\)/:

Re: [gentoo-user] bug in 'sed'?

On 2005-04-29 12:09:48 +0200 (Fri, Apr), Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > Hi! > > I need to use a regexp in sed for parsing a file... and I found a wrong > behaviour. I've tried in some computers, and I've found -DIFFERENT- > behaviours. > > It works -wrong- to me, in sed 4.0.9 and sed 4.1.4. > H