On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 10:37:08 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:
> Used to do that - heaps of problems when using multiple machines and
> multiple users.
There used to be problems when trying to download the same file from two
computers at once, but NFS-aware file locking in portage fixed that quite
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 08:18:11AM +, Mick wrote
> How does boa compares with http-replicator in terms of
> functionality/security?
boa is a lean+mean+fast webserver. See http://www.boa.org for details.
> PS. Other than not running portmapper is there a way of securing it?
It has to b
On 11/06/06, Walter Dnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip . . . ]
My approach is to make *LOCAL* copies on the client from mirrors. The
local server just happens to be the first mirror on the list. If it
doesn't have a required file, no problem, check the next mirror in the
list. The client
On 10 June 2006 10:02, Michael Weyershäuser wrote:
> Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> > Much simplier:
> > http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Using_a_shared_portage_via_NFS
>
> I have used that setup for some time and must say that sharing
> portage over NFS is slow like hell...
Not here. 100baseT network is quite
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 22:43:03 -0400
"Walter Dnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My approach requires 2 emerges (boa and rsyncd) and their config files
> on the server plus inserting the server as the preferred mirror in 2
> lines in /etc/make.conf on the client(s).
>
That's close to what I do a
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:09:05AM -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote
> Much simplier:
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Using_a_shared_portage_via_NFS
My approach requires 2 emerges (boa and rsyncd) and their config files
on the server plus inserting the server as the preferred mirror in 2
lines in /etc/m
Used to do that - heaps of problems when using multiple machines and
multiple users. http-replicator insulates you from that. It also
allows you to remove nfs if you dont need it for anything else - also
simplifies and makes the system (all machines) more reliable. nfs is ok
in its place, but it
Bob Sanders wrote:
>On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 10:25:25 +
>Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>What's the pros/cons of mounting portage over NFS Vs http-replicator?
>>
>>
>
>
>If you only have one architecture and one system type or one system that
>can be a superset of the others, nfs will
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 10:25:25 +
Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What's the pros/cons of mounting portage over NFS Vs http-replicator?
If you only have one architecture and one system type or one system that
can be a superset of the others, nfs will serve you fine.
If you have multiple a
On 10/06/06, Michael Weyershäuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>
> Much simplier:
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Using_a_shared_portage_via_NFS
I have used that setup for some time and must say that sharing
portage over NFS is slow
On 6/10/06, Michael Weyershäuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1Jeremy Olexa wrote:>> Much simplier:> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Using_a_shared_portage_via_NFS
I have used that setup for some time and must say that sharingportage over NFS is slow like hell.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Weyershäuser wrote:
> Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>>> Much simplier:
>>> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Using_a_shared_portage_via_NFS
>
> I have used that setup for some time and must say that sharing
> portage over NFS is slow like hell...
I really o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>
> Much simplier:
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Using_a_shared_portage_via_NFS
I have used that setup for some time and must say that sharing
portage over NFS is slow like hell...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 07:00:05 +0200, Michael Weyershäuser wrote:
> I don't really see the need for such elaborate setups. I just export
> /usr/portage/distfiles via NFS on the server and mount it on all other
> boxes...
I've been doing it that way for years. there were some problems with
simultane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Walter Dnes wrote:
>
Much simplier:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Using_a_shared_portage_via_NFS
- --
Jeremy Olexa
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Office: EE/CS 1-201
CS/IT Systems Staff
University of Minnesota
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.
Michael Weyershäuser wrote:
> I don't really see the need for such elaborate setups. I just export
> /usr/portage/distfiles via NFS on the server and mount it on all other
> boxes...
That is a good way to do it. I was going to before but I had http thing
set up already. If you think about it a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't really see the need for such elaborate setups. I just export
/usr/portage/distfiles via NFS on the server and mount it on all other
boxes...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - h
try torpage http://www.kroon.co.za/torpage.php
--
Ing. Anielkis Herrera González
Desarrollador de Nova LNX
Linux User #377809
Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas
18 matches
Mail list logo
