On Wednesday 26 April 2006 09:42, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Dan Johansson wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 April 2006 07:33, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> >> Dan Johansson wrote:
> >> > On Monday 24 April 2006 20:04, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 19:58 +0200, Dan Johansson wrote:
> >> >>
Nick Rout wrote:
Piping to telnet worked with netkit-telnetd's client but not
telnet-bsd's
Then the software is really broken... Standard behaviour
of telnet is to NOT read from stdin.
That's, why there is netcat.
Alexander Skwar
--
Book: "They'll come at you sideways. It's how they think:
Dan Johansson wrote:
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 07:33, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Dan Johansson wrote:
> On Monday 24 April 2006 20:04, Michael Sullivan wrote:
>> On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 19:58 +0200, Dan Johansson wrote:
>> > I only need a telnet client and not the whole server part. Any
[...]
>> I th
Am Dienstag, 25. April 2006 20:31 schrieb ext Neil Bothwick:
> "rm -f /sbin/init" should remove the possibility of accidents :)
No, it wouldn't. People could still - by accident, of course - append
init=/bin/bash to their kernel command line. However, you'd need to try
hard to create an acciden
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 18:58, Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Alternative to netkit-telnetd':
> Piping to telnet worked with netkit-telnetd's client but not
> telnet-bsd's
Sound like one opens a new pty and the other just uses std{in
Just a warning, the netkit-telnetd and telnet-bsd clients do not work
identically.
I was recently testing some remote control software that connected to a
remote telnet port. The software would issue command like:
echo jump mainmenu | telnet mythtvbox 6546
Piping to telnet worked with netkit-tel
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:10:55 -0400, Erik Zeek wrote:
> Once would have been understandable, but I did mine twice (only once as
> root though). It's fun to stare at the screen wondering why it's taken
> 5 minutes to delete two hidden directories, followed by a scream of,
> "OH SH*T!" which is imm
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:44:12 -0700, kashani wrote:
You might want to delete chmod and chown as well since files
could accidentally get owned to another users or have its permissions
changed. :-)
"rm -f /sbin/init" should remove the possibility of accidents :)
Grr. I hate this keyboard.
> Once would have been understandable, but I did mine twice
> (only once as root though). It's fun to stare at the screen
> wondering why it's taken 5 minutes to delete two hidden
> directories, followed by a scream of, "OH SH*T!" which is
> immediately followed by
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Zeek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 3:11 PM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Alternative to netkit-telnetd
>
> On Tue April 25 2006 14:46, John Jolet wrote:
> > >
On Tue April 25 2006 14:46, John Jolet wrote:
> > I find that "rm -rf .*" works wonders for security.
>
> Now guys, someone new is going to try one of these! :) And we all know
> we've done that at one time or another. Mine was "rm -fr /* filename"
> on a running sun box. :) during month-end p
On 4/25/06 1:41 PM, "Erik Zeek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue April 25 2006 14:31, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:44:12 -0700, kashani wrote:
>>> You might want to delete chmod and chown as well since files
>>> could accidentally get owned to another users or have its perm
On Tue April 25 2006 14:31, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:44:12 -0700, kashani wrote:
> > You might want to delete chmod and chown as well since files
> > could accidentally get owned to another users or have its permissions
> > changed. :-)
>
> "rm -f /sbin/init" should remove
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:44:12 -0700, kashani wrote:
> You might want to delete chmod and chown as well since files
> could accidentally get owned to another users or have its permissions
> changed. :-)
"rm -f /sbin/init" should remove the possibility of accidents :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Top
Dan Johansson wrote:
Yes I know that I can just let the server disabled. But I was just wondering
if there where any alternatives so that the server don't get started by
"accident". Will probably delete the server after the emerge.
Tanks for your input!
You might want to delete chmod and ch
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 07:33, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Dan Johansson wrote:
> > On Monday 24 April 2006 20:04, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 19:58 +0200, Dan Johansson wrote:
> >> > I only need a telnet client and not the whole server part. Any
>
> [...]
>
> >> I think the on
Dan Johansson wrote:
On Monday 24 April 2006 20:04, Michael Sullivan wrote:
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 19:58 +0200, Dan Johansson wrote:
> I only need a telnet client and not the whole server part. Any
[...]
I think the one I use is called 'telnet-bsd'. It's just the client...
Thanks for the
Dan Johansson wrote:
> I only need a telnet client and not the whole server part. Any suggestions on
> alternatives to netkit-telnetd. The Client must behave just like the standard
> telnet-client (I have some expect-scripts using telnet).
>
> Regards,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ time sudo emerge -vb
> I only need a telnet client and not the whole server part. Any suggestions
> on alternatives to netkit-telnetd. The Client must behave just like the
> standard telnet-client (I have some expect-scripts using telnet).
netcat - the one and only.
--
Best Regards,
Peper
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
On Monday 24 April 2006 20:04, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 19:58 +0200, Dan Johansson wrote:
> > I only need a telnet client and not the whole server part. Any
> > suggestions on alternatives to netkit-telnetd. The Client must behave
> > just like the standard telnet-client (I h
On 4/24/06, Dan Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I only need a telnet client and not the whole server part. Any suggestions on
> alternatives to netkit-telnetd. The Client must behave just like the standard
> telnet-client (I have some expect-scripts using telnet).
>
Its lightweight, I mean
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 19:58 +0200, Dan Johansson wrote:
> I only need a telnet client and not the whole server part. Any suggestions on
> alternatives to netkit-telnetd. The Client must behave just like the standard
> telnet-client (I have some expect-scripts using telnet).
>
> Regards,
I think
22 matches
Mail list logo
