On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 01:21 -0500, David Klempner wrote:
> * Vladimir G. Ivanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-20 16:51]:
> > I figured it out. The VMSPLIT options are *not* available on 64-bit
> > systems. (Phew. It's neither encroaching madness nor Alzheimer's.)
>
> Yeah... I suppose I wasn't pa
* Ralph Slooten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-21 04:12]:
> Sorry, but one thing remains unclear. Ignoring the fact that adding
> embedded extras to your kernel on a non-embedded system just to get the
> the VMSPLIT options is (in my opinion) confusing and unlogical, is this
> step actually needed co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
David Klempner wrote:
> Actually, I side with the kernel developers on this; the fact that
> they're hiding the VMSPLIT options is basically a subtle hint that they
> don't want people using them who don't *really* know what they're doing.
* Vladimir G. Ivanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-20 16:51]:
> I figured it out. The VMSPLIT options are *not* available on 64-bit
> systems. (Phew. It's neither encroaching madness nor Alzheimer's.)
Yeah... I suppose I wasn't paying close enough attention to what you
were saying. :-)
The VMSPL
* Ralph Slooten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-21 00:15]:
> I upgraded yesterday to 2.6.17 and also noticed that there was no split
> option. Not thinking much of it I installed the kernel which works fine,
> except now /proc/kcore reports 897M, and `free` something to that effect
> too.
>
> So I ta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Klempner wrote:
> For whatever reason, they made prompting about VMSPLIT dependent on
> CONFIG_EMBEDDED.
I upgraded yesterday to 2.6.17 and also noticed that there was no split
option. Not thinking much of it I installed the kernel which works f
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 15:01 -0500, David Klempner wrote:
> * Vladimir G. Ivanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-20 14:45]:
> > > >
> > > > Is that with x86 and 2.6.17? I had those config options with 2.6.16,
> > > > but they are not present in 2.6.17. Though looking at
> > > > /usr/src/linux/arch/i
* David Klempner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-20 14:15]:
> For whatever reason, they made prompting about VMSPLIT dependent on
> CONFIG_EMBEDDED.
Quoting http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.17 :
---
commit 9539d4e79fae8482bc64ced03a46c7c6d711d19e
Author: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL
* Vladimir G. Ivanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-20 14:45]:
> > >
> > > Is that with x86 and 2.6.17? I had those config options with 2.6.16,
> > > but they are not present in 2.6.17. Though looking at
> > > /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/Kconfig I cannot see why the option was not
> > > offered.
> >
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 14:05 -0500, David Klempner wrote:
> * Graham Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-20 12:55]:
> > Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > # CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set
> > > CONFIG_VMSPLIT_3G=y
> > > # CONFIG_VMSPLIT_3G_OPT is not set
> > > # CONFIG_VMSPLIT_2G is
* Graham Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-20 12:55]:
> Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > # CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set
> > CONFIG_VMSPLIT_3G=y
> > # CONFIG_VMSPLIT_3G_OPT is not set
> > # CONFIG_VMSPLIT_2G is not set
> > # CONFIG_VMSPLIT_1G is not set
> > CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET=0xC00
Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> # CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set
> CONFIG_VMSPLIT_3G=y
> # CONFIG_VMSPLIT_3G_OPT is not set
> # CONFIG_VMSPLIT_2G is not set
> # CONFIG_VMSPLIT_1G is not set
> CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET=0xC000
> CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y
Is that with x86 and 2.6.17? I had those confi
Yea, What architecture are you running on? Is it possible that you
have some kind of memory interleaving option turned on in your bios
that isn't working right because of slight timing differences in the
manufacturing of each stick of ram? Are they exactly the same spec
(CAS,NS, etc..)? What's
# CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set
CONFIG_VMSPLIT_3G=y
# CONFIG_VMSPLIT_3G_OPT is not set
# CONFIG_VMSPLIT_2G is not set
# CONFIG_VMSPLIT_1G is not set
CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET=0xC000
CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:
What are the names of the config options that chan
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 09:01:26AM -0700, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:
> What are the names of the config options that change the memory split?
> I'm running gentoo-sources-2.6.17, and for the life of me, I can't find
> any config option that deal with memory (and I know they existed: I've
> set the
What are the names of the config options that change the memory split?
I'm running gentoo-sources-2.6.17, and for the life of me, I can't find
any config option that deal with memory (and I know they existed: I've
set them before.)
Thanks.
--- Vladimir
--
Vladimir G. Ivanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks David for the clear answers I'll investigate further. As for
the rest of the PC running great with extra RAM ~ it's just UT2004 I
have discovered to have an issue here.
The 2/2 is what I'm running with at the moment ... seems to be fine
* Ralph Slooten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-19 00:25]:
> David Klempner wrote:
> > Note that without doing *anything*, with a normal 3G/1G split, you'll
> > actually get 896M. Recent kernels added in a config option to have a
> > 2.75G/1.25G split, which solves this problem; it makes sense to use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
David Klempner wrote:
> Note that without doing *anything*, with a normal 3G/1G split, you'll
> actually get 896M. Recent kernels added in a config option to have a
> 2.75G/1.25G split, which solves this problem; it makes sense to use that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steven Susbauer wrote:
> What graphics card are you using? Sluggish and screen jolts sound possibly
> like your graphics are too high for the card. Generally too little ram
> will result in your HD doing a lot of work during gameplay.
GeForce 6600/GeF
* Ralph Slooten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-18 12:52]:
> Today I expended my RAM to 2GB (DDR) to my workstation, as apposed to
> the initial 1GB I had. The RAm added is identical to the initial RAM.
> Without changing the kernel (2.6.16.x) I still get 1GB available, and
> digging into the kernel I
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Ralph Slooten wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi list,
>
> Today I expended my RAM to 2GB (DDR) to my workstation, as apposed to
> the initial 1GB I had. The RAm added is identical to the initial RAM.
> Without changing the kernel (2.6.16.x) I stil
22 matches
Mail list logo
