-user] 100% disk full again
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 00:03:41 -0400
From: Robert G. Hays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nick Rout wrote:
>O
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 22:57:10 +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
> This one (not my original work) I liked:
>
> http://clug.net.nz/index.php/GentooTips
I like that one too. None of the scripts I saw dealt with a shared
distfiles directory, they deleted all files not used by the machine
running the script. M
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 08:50 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > Cleaning all distfiles was a decision I made on having high speed
> > downloads. Considering your problem of slow downloads, I have
> changed
> > the script to remove files that have been on the system after 30
> number
> > of days. Adjust
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 22:33:06 -0500, Kirk Schneider wrote:
> Orginally I was cleaning ccache since my emerge runs under root and
> root's home directory is on a small partition. Taking your input
> I've decided to just set ccache size and not use my script to clean it.
Why not set ccache (I think
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 22:33:06 -0500
Kirk Schneider wrote:
> Considering your problem of slow downloads, I have changed the script
> to remove files that have been on the system after 30 number of days.
> Adjust the number of days based on your needs.
well I sure can't complain about your responsi
Nick Rout wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 20:40:46 -0500
Kirk Schneider wrote:
orrected script, suggest using with >portage-2.0.51.
Here's a script I have to handle running the updates.
If the portage hasn't been synced that day, it will clean out
the ccache files
why do you clean ccache, doesn't
riginal Message ----
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 100% disk full again
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 13:55:52 +1200
From: Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, 2
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 20:40:46 -0500
Kirk Schneider wrote:
>
> Corrected script, suggest using with >portage-2.0.51.
>
> Here's a script I have to handle running the updates.
>
> If the portage hasn't been synced that day, it will clean out
> the ccache files
why do you clean ccache, doesn't th
Corrected script, suggest using with >portage-2.0.51.
Here's a script I have to handle running the updates.
If the portage hasn't been synced that day, it will clean out
the ccache files and distfiles, then sync portage.
Last line runs emerge to start updating the all the packages.
#!/bin/bash
#
#
else
/usr/bin/emerge --sync
fi
/usr/sbin/fixpackages
fi
/usr/bin/emerge --ask --deep --newuse --update --verbose world
--
Kirk Schneider
Original Message --------
Subject: ***SPAM(6.5)*** Re: [gentoo-user] 100% disk full again
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:18:06 -0300
From: Franci
else
/usr/bin/emerge --sync
fi
/usr/sbin/fixpackages
fi
/usr/bin/emerge --ask --deep --newuse --update --verbose world
--
Kirk Schneider
Original Message --------
Subject: ***SPAM(6.5)*** Re: [gentoo-user] 100% disk full again
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:18:06 -0300
From: Franci
Speaking of disk space, I noticed the metadata directory under
/usr/portage is around 81Mb on one of my servers - is this normal? This
means, even with /usr/portage/distfiles being empty, my portage tree is
currently 587Mb (I guess the days of it being < 200Mb are long gone heh?).
--
--
gento
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:18:06 -0300, Francisco Ares wrote:
> >I don't think it could, because it doesn't know which ones you wish to
> >keep. I don't know about your reasons, but I use buildpkg so I always
> >have a binary of the previous version available, making it easy to
> >roll back if a probl
Neil Bothwick wrote:
>On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 10:00:59 -0300, Francisco Ares wrote:
>
>
>>And that's a good point: /var/portage gets pretty full of hundreds of
>>megs once in a while, and so does /usr/portage/distfiles and (in my
>>case) /usr/portage/packages - so how could portage clean up by defa
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 10:00:59 -0300, Francisco Ares wrote:
> And that's a good point: /var/portage gets pretty full of hundreds of
> megs once in a while, and so does /usr/portage/distfiles and (in my
> case) /usr/portage/packages - so how could portage clean up by default
> the binary packages
I
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 07:50:14 -0400
Eric S. Johansson wrote:
> right? wrong? what does a portage cleaner look like?
http://clug.net.nz/index.php/GentooTips
>
> --- eric
>
> --
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
> followed by an 'rm -rf /var/tmp/portage'
>
> I do get one error I'm not sure how to clean.
>
> getfetchlist(): aux_get() error reading app-text/aspell-0.50.3; aborting.
> Failed to get file list for app-text/aspell-0.50.3
> !!! aux_get(): ebuild path for 'net-misc/dhcpcd-1.3.22_p4-r4' not
>
Eric S. Johansson wrote:
this is all portage's fault.. ;-)
my 300+ package upgrade is almost done. but OO died because of no disk
space on the laptop (yes, I will go with a binary for this one after I
clean up the mess)
what is the best way to keep the portage files down to a reasonable set?
I
I use a shared NFS /usr/portage/ among 4 computers (a server, 2 desktops
and a test machine) and it works fine, just the server needs to sync in
the middle of the night, and as I have mostly Pentium3 (server + 2
workstations), the server and my own workstation are setup to build
binary packages - t
19 matches
Mail list logo
