on Tuesday 07/15/2008 Neil Bothwick([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 03:54:43 -0400, John covici wrote:
>
> > > Did you try updating glibc even though it's not a dependency with
> > > x86?
> >
> > Nope, because I was hesitant being this is an unstable version
>
> It is
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 03:54:43 -0400, John covici wrote:
> > Did you try updating glibc even though it's not a dependency with
> > x86?
>
> Nope, because I was hesitant being this is an unstable version
It is not unstable, the ~arch keyword means the ebuild is still in
testing. Nowhere in the
2 matches
Mail list logo
